Other Car Related Discussions Discuss all other cars here.

Slammed. Dumped. Whatever you want to call it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 12-05-2008, 10:59 PM
Rod2Rice's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 907
I'll never get the point of lowering something like that, looks ridiculous.
 
  #22  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:05 PM
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vallejo, Ca
Posts: 7,343
im all for a slammed car, but that s2k is dumb
 
  #23  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:09 PM
Kyle is raaddd's Avatar
Master FitFaker. CHEA!
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marble Falls, TX
Posts: 5,317
that's ****ing insane.



i love it
 
  #24  
Old 12-05-2008, 11:34 PM
SD_MR_FIT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Diego,ca
Posts: 4,812
heh he drives like that daily.

he goes to the honda meets and is chill with my homies.

hes super dumped guys and thats daily.


i love all his cars. they all have advans rg golds and are super sick.
 
  #25  
Old 12-06-2008, 12:15 AM
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 8,956
I also think the S2K looks stupid. It looked better before.
I think my Fit is maxed the lowest a Fit can go and still be driven without problems.

Granted I cant get into certain parking lots, and getting out is worse. Most places are smooth enough though.
I did manage to get over 2 speed bumps last weekend. Made lots of noises but my front lip is still there and so is my exhaust.

I hate the way that S2K has +100mm offset too.
People that have slammed cars run crazy high offset to save themself noise and fender rolling. I prefer a better look/stance.
Im low and run low offsets.
 
  #26  
Old 12-06-2008, 01:14 AM
shazaam's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ND
Posts: 1,013
She looks sexy...but Imo, she'd look nicer with low offset wheels and some sexy - camber :) mmmmmmmm camber.
 
  #27  
Old 12-06-2008, 01:16 AM
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Vallejo, Ca
Posts: 7,343
thats it ray, and shazaam, lower offset with camber would look way better
 
  #28  
Old 12-10-2008, 12:32 PM
Nabisco's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 305
I bet it handles like shit too.
 

Last edited by Nabisco; 12-10-2008 at 12:39 PM.
  #29  
Old 12-24-2008, 08:33 PM
redrumm's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: wagovan
Posts: 4,534
that car is for sale and he has a video of him getting on it haha
 
  #30  
Old 12-24-2008, 08:55 PM
MNfit's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,379
Originally Posted by I Am Ray.
....I hate the way that S2K has +100mm offset too.
People that have slammed cars run crazy high offset to save themself noise and fender rolling. I prefer a better look/stance.
Im low and run low offsets.
I think thats the reason that S2k ain't working for me either, that first pic is asinine but even those rolling shots aren't doing it for me. I think if he was that low and had a very low offset wheel it would look a lot better
 
  #31  
Old 12-24-2008, 10:34 PM
StewPiddass's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada eh!
Posts: 89
What a waste of a good car like a S2K... There's no good reason to lower a car that much, especially one that's meant to perform like the S2K.
 
  #32  
Old 12-24-2008, 10:39 PM
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 60
I'd prefer a car that can be driven on surfaces other than those that are perfectly flat, but that's just me... just getting in and out of my driveway would tear something up/off within a day.
 
  #33  
Old 12-31-2008, 09:51 AM
Edison Carasio's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 745
Waste of a good S2k IMO. But it's his car so hope he has fun.
 
  #34  
Old 12-31-2008, 07:06 PM
Im|Inside|Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: fresno, ca,. us
Posts: 970
thats what im talking about! =)
 
  #35  
Old 12-31-2008, 07:35 PM
Burrellimages's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leicester, NC USA
Posts: 51
I love it! I've owned several cars that were low like that and a couple i drove every day. Here is one of my OLD honda's that had air cylinders on it. I could air it up about 1/4 inch and still roll. I cruised like that all the time.

 
  #36  
Old 12-31-2008, 07:38 PM
Kyle is raaddd's Avatar
Master FitFaker. CHEA!
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marble Falls, TX
Posts: 5,317
^^
ummmm............................................. ..
:/
 
  #37  
Old 12-31-2008, 07:39 PM
Burrellimages's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leicester, NC USA
Posts: 51
if you look at the side bar on the picture...that was back in 2001. Styles of wheels etc were WAY different back then! LOL
 
  #38  
Old 01-01-2009, 03:40 PM
trancedsailor's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Holmdel, NJ --Exit 114
Posts: 4,235
today, that CRX would be rice and laughed at. Huge wing, chrome ghetto fab wheels....blegh...
 
  #39  
Old 01-01-2009, 04:44 PM
Burrellimages's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leicester, NC USA
Posts: 51
Yeah i agree! LOL

But back in 97/98 when the car was built, it was ahead of it's time and had several magazines shoot it. 17's were HUGE back then, full tweed interiors were all the rage and air suspension on an import car was so new that very few people had it.
 
  #40  
Old 01-01-2009, 05:14 PM
VBP08GD3's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Spring Break Nation, FL
Posts: 555
its coils he does not ride around like that he just lowered it in that pic for show... come on bro if it were cut springs that is a different story
 


Quick Reply: Slammed. Dumped. Whatever you want to call it.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:05 AM.