Other Car Related Discussions Discuss all other cars here.

Slammed. Dumped. Whatever you want to call it.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #21  
Rod2Rice's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 907
From: NY
I'll never get the point of lowering something like that, looks ridiculous.
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 11:05 PM
  #22  
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,343
From: Vallejo, Ca
5 Year Member
im all for a slammed car, but that s2k is dumb
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 11:09 PM
  #23  
Kyle is raaddd's Avatar
Master FitFaker. CHEA!
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,317
From: Marble Falls, TX
that's ****ing insane.



i love it
 
Old Dec 5, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #24  
SD_MR_FIT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,812
From: San Diego,ca
heh he drives like that daily.

he goes to the honda meets and is chill with my homies.

hes super dumped guys and thats daily.


i love all his cars. they all have advans rg golds and are super sick.
 
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #25  
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,956
From: Orlando, FL
I also think the S2K looks stupid. It looked better before.
I think my Fit is maxed the lowest a Fit can go and still be driven without problems.

Granted I cant get into certain parking lots, and getting out is worse. Most places are smooth enough though.
I did manage to get over 2 speed bumps last weekend. Made lots of noises but my front lip is still there and so is my exhaust.

I hate the way that S2K has +100mm offset too.
People that have slammed cars run crazy high offset to save themself noise and fender rolling. I prefer a better look/stance.
Im low and run low offsets.
 
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 01:14 AM
  #26  
shazaam's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,013
From: ND
She looks sexy...but Imo, she'd look nicer with low offset wheels and some sexy - camber :) mmmmmmmm camber.
 
Old Dec 6, 2008 | 01:16 AM
  #27  
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,343
From: Vallejo, Ca
5 Year Member
thats it ray, and shazaam, lower offset with camber would look way better
 
Old Dec 10, 2008 | 12:32 PM
  #28  
Nabisco's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 305
From: Florida
I bet it handles like shit too.
 

Last edited by Nabisco; Dec 10, 2008 at 12:39 PM.
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #29  
redrumm's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,534
From: wagovan
that car is for sale and he has a video of him getting on it haha
 
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 08:55 PM
  #30  
MNfit's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (8)
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,380
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by I Am Ray.
....I hate the way that S2K has +100mm offset too.
People that have slammed cars run crazy high offset to save themself noise and fender rolling. I prefer a better look/stance.
Im low and run low offsets.
I think thats the reason that S2k ain't working for me either, that first pic is asinine but even those rolling shots aren't doing it for me. I think if he was that low and had a very low offset wheel it would look a lot better
 
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 10:34 PM
  #31  
StewPiddass's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 89
From: Canada eh!
What a waste of a good car like a S2K... There's no good reason to lower a car that much, especially one that's meant to perform like the S2K.
 
Old Dec 24, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #32  
FirefighterErik's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 60
From: Maryland
I'd prefer a car that can be driven on surfaces other than those that are perfectly flat, but that's just me... just getting in and out of my driveway would tear something up/off within a day.
 
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #33  
Edison Carasio's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 745
From: St. Louis, Mo
5 Year Member
Waste of a good S2k IMO. But it's his car so hope he has fun.
 
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #34  
Im|Inside|Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 970
From: fresno, ca,. us
thats what im talking about! =)
 
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 07:35 PM
  #35  
Burrellimages's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
From: Leicester, NC USA
I love it! I've owned several cars that were low like that and a couple i drove every day. Here is one of my OLD honda's that had air cylinders on it. I could air it up about 1/4 inch and still roll. I cruised like that all the time.

 
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 07:38 PM
  #36  
Kyle is raaddd's Avatar
Master FitFaker. CHEA!
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,317
From: Marble Falls, TX
^^
ummmm............................................. ..
:/
 
Old Dec 31, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #37  
Burrellimages's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
From: Leicester, NC USA
if you look at the side bar on the picture...that was back in 2001. Styles of wheels etc were WAY different back then! LOL
 
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #38  
trancedsailor's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,235
From: Holmdel, NJ --Exit 114
today, that CRX would be rice and laughed at. Huge wing, chrome ghetto fab wheels....blegh...
 
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 04:44 PM
  #39  
Burrellimages's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 51
From: Leicester, NC USA
Yeah i agree! LOL

But back in 97/98 when the car was built, it was ahead of it's time and had several magazines shoot it. 17's were HUGE back then, full tweed interiors were all the rage and air suspension on an import car was so new that very few people had it.
 
Old Jan 1, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #40  
VBP08GD3's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 555
From: Spring Break Nation, FL
its coils he does not ride around like that he just lowered it in that pic for show... come on bro if it were cut springs that is a different story
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 PM.