Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Reference Library for Engine Modifications, Swaps and Tuning

Doug Thorley Supercharger & Kraftwerks Supercharger Comparison Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #41  
Mr_ET's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,149
From: Quebec City, Qc
Originally Posted by drzenitram
From the way that JDMChris/KW handled this, I can assuredly say that when I make my SC purchase it will not be from KW. I may buy from Doug Thorley instead.

Why? Because this thread has made the contrast of the way these two companies do business glaringly obvious.

At the frontlines of Doug Thorley's fit crew appears to be a mature and honest, well behaved and well mannered salesman with the consumer in mind. Obviously Doug Thorley wants to provide a product to the consumers that will give them an option -- and a cheaper one at that -- of going another route. Also, even when JDMChris made his unprovoked, ignorant, and childish attack on the quality of Doug Thorley's product, this rep handled the situation coolly and professionally without being defensive, but rather keeping to their obvious standard of keeping the consumers informed and dealing directly with the facts rather than wild assumptions.

JDMChris, on the other hand, came into this thread with guns blazing. Obviously at first sight of rivaling threads KW has their fire lit, clearly they're determined to stamp out any competition with assumptions and accusations galore. The maturity of the representative here poses a problem for me, as GOOD companies usually choose representatives that REPRESENT what their company is like. In this case I would be lead to believe that KW is worried that their product either won't be good enough to compete OR maybe they just want the market share for themselves. Set their own prices, maybe?

Well, where I come from we know that competition is a good thing, and JDMChris, I think you should take a look into that book. Competition is good for the consumer -- isn't that who you said you cared about? Competition keeps all companies involved pushed to create a better, cheaper product that appeals to the consumer. What is it about for you? Making money? Or is it about being the best at what you do and giving your consumers the very best deal you can?

And if you know of problems with the setup and you've got the consumer in mind, wouldn't you want to let Doug Thorley know so that the consumers you care about don't end up with the problems you speak of and your competition can push you further with their developments?

Anyways, this thread definitely killed my appreciation for KW.
My friend you are completely missing the point. JDMChris came in here not dissing the kit because it's competition but because it would be unfair to leave out some very important details.

Details like the fact that this is clearly the old version of the KW SC
It is clearly a partnership that went sour
This vendor has not proven himself in anyway and yet comes in selling another companies product as his own.

I would also never dream of calling JDMChris ignorant about this since he is the ONLY person that has experienced both kits and he is trying to educate potential buyers that may not be aware of all the details above.

Carry on
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:02 AM
  #42  
drzenitram's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 501
From: Wichita, Kansas
Except somehow the kit has become carb legal, something which JDMChris falsely assumed about their setup, as they later stated that the kit IS carb legal. I call that ignorance.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:17 AM
  #43  
drzenitram's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 501
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by leonine
Dude i dont think you have a clue about what you are talking about.

First off i do agree slightly that the info coming from KW and JDMC was somewhat misleading but that was cleared up. Now i realize IMO why KW has been so secretive about releasing photos/detailed info about their kit because they must have known that their old partners were planning this and did not want to let them have more good ideas. why would JDMC tell DT anything?

looks to me like their was a partnership gone south for whatever reason and DT is trying to get back some of their investment while KW has taken it to the next level. Wonder why KW has not sued them but maybe they are limited by the terms of their prior agreement.

Bottom line is that DT is using an outdated design which was KW and KW has improved on that dramatically.

Good point. Why HASN'T KW sued them? And why do you all follow these KW guys like sheep? I mean, seriously, all they show you are pictures and dyno sheets all the same. They just get you excited and have had time to answer questions. If they have a problem with DT selling their "old product"(if it even is their old product) then they should take it out in the proper format -- in court. Not by making childish accusations in a forum.

It's really sickening to see all of you believing every word JDMChris says like he's the omniscient supercharger guru.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:38 AM
  #44  
08XR's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
From: Chino Hills
It seems as though KW has a representative that is too skewed and biased to give any good information on their product.

I did however ask the DT tech guy about the outdated issues such as the tensioner and that it has been updated as with other components that people are saying are outdated when in fact they are not. The only reason they think this is because of word of mouth by one or 2 other people NOT from DT. Oh well, we will see what develops. I plan on reading more into this, as it seems the KW is not giving out all the details on their kit with fair comparison to the DT.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:40 AM
  #45  
08XR's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
From: Chino Hills
I just comfirmed with DT that there is in fact a tensioner. He's going to get pics of the kit put up soon.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 02:53 AM
  #46  
claymore's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,276
From: Hotter than the SUN
Originally Posted by drzenitram
From the way that JDMChris/KW handled this, I can assuredly say that when I make my SC purchase it will not be from KW. I may buy from Doug Thorley instead.

Why? Because this thread has made the contrast of the way these two companies do business glaringly obvious.

At the frontlines of Doug Thorley's fit crew appears to be a mature and honest, well behaved and well mannered salesman with the consumer in mind. Obviously Doug Thorley wants to provide a product to the consumers that will give them an option -- and a cheaper one at that -- of going another route. Also, even when JDMChris made his unprovoked, ignorant, and childish attack on the quality of Doug Thorley's product, this rep handled the situation coolly and professionally without being defensive, but rather keeping to their obvious standard of keeping the consumers informed and dealing directly with the facts rather than wild assumptions.

JDMChris, on the other hand, came into this thread with guns blazing. Obviously at first sight of rivaling threads KW has their fire lit, clearly they're determined to stamp out any competition with assumptions and accusations galore. The maturity of the representative here poses a problem for me, as GOOD companies usually choose representatives that REPRESENT what their company is like. In this case I would be lead to believe that KW is worried that their product either won't be good enough to compete OR maybe they just want the market share for themselves. Set their own prices, maybe?

Well, where I come from we know that competition is a good thing, and JDMChris, I think you should take a look into that book. Competition is good for the consumer -- isn't that who you said you cared about? Competition keeps all companies involved pushed to create a better, cheaper product that appeals to the consumer. What is it about for you? Making money? Or is it about being the best at what you do and giving your consumers the very best deal you can?

And if you know of problems with the setup and you've got the consumer in mind, wouldn't you want to let Doug Thorley know so that the consumers you care about don't end up with the problems you speak of and your competition can push you further with their developments?

Anyways, this thread definitely killed my appreciation for KW.
.............
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #47  
Illusive's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,742
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Alright everyone, this is getting way out of hand. I'm not sure who is who anymore on this forum as I know for a fact that some people are running around with two FF.net identities claiming to be different people. To be honest, I find that very low. I'll be in contact with admin to sort this out. Unfortunately, I don't think everyone is reading into everything that has been going on and are making false assumptions and accusations from both sides.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #48  
DynamicFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 423
From: Aliso Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by drzenitram
Good point. Why HASN'T KW sued them? And why do you all follow these KW guys like sheep? I mean, seriously, all they show you are pictures and dyno sheets all the same. They just get you excited and have had time to answer questions. If they have a problem with DT selling their "old product"(if it even is their old product) then they should take it out in the proper format -- in court. Not by making childish accusations in a forum.

It's really sickening to see all of you believing every word JDMChris says like he's the omniscient supercharger guru.
I hope you know that although JDMChris is backing KW wholeheartedly, it does not mean he is an actual representative from KW. In my opinion he is simply an owner of the product and therefore as subject to scrutiny as any other individual who may back a product that they own and believe in. If you think of it this way, KW has not bashed Doug Thorley's product in the least, since what was said by Chris is simply the statement of a member talking about what they own, as any of us has done before.

In conclusion I agree with you the Doug Thorley representative has acted mature and handled this thread very well, while taking critcism for the kit very well, but I would not blame Oscar Jackson Jr. for the statements made against the Doug Thorley kit, as it was not specifically made by his company, only an individual who has had experience with both kits and is simply sharing his reaction with them. Although I do feel that Chris' opinions are pretty skewed at times, I choose to take most of those things that I feel are either improbable or exaggerations with a grain of salt. Let the companies sell their products and after all is said and done we can talk about what each of us like or dislike about our kits.

Tom
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #49  
Illusive's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,742
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by DynamicFit
I hope you know that although JDMChris is backing KW wholeheartedly, it does not mean he is an actual representative from KW. In my opinion he is simply an owner of the product and therefore as subject to scrutiny as any other individual who may back a product that they own and believe in. If you think of it this way, KW has not bashed Doug Thorley's product in the least, since what was said by Chris is simply the statement of a member talking about what they own, as any of us has done before.

In conclusion I agree with you the Doug Thorley representative has acted mature and handled this thread very well, while taking critcism for the kit very well, but I would not blame Oscar Jackson Jr. for the statements made against the Doug Thorley kit, as it was not specifically made by his company, only an individual who has had experience with both kits and is simply sharing his reaction with them. Although I do feel that Chris' opinions are pretty skewed at times, I choose to take most of those things that I feel are either improbable or exaggerations with a grain of salt. Let the companies sell their products and after all is said and done we can talk about what each of us like or dislike about our kits.

Tom
What we need is Obama's speech from yesterday...

DynamicFit hit it right on the head, KW has never posted in this thread and has kept silent since this all began. JDMChris is entitled to his opinion and experience like everyone else on this forum. What you do with that information is up to you.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #50  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Illusive
What we need is Obama's speech from yesterday...

DynamicFit hit it right on the head, KW has never posted in this thread and has kept silent since this all began. JDMChris is entitled to his opinion and experience like everyone else on this forum. What you do with that information is up to you.

exactly!

when did JDM chris become the spokesperson for kw? i never heard him say that he was, so any accusation that he his acting on their behalf, or on their payroll etc. is silly.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 12:12 PM
  #51  
Illusive's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,742
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Doug Thorley Supercharger & Kraftwerks Supercharger Comparison Thread

All posts pertaining to the comparison of these two supercharger offerings will be moved here and subsequent posts regarding the two superchargers will be posted here. This thread will be closely monitored.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 12:16 PM
  #52  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
I work For Honda, do not work for KW. I only have the kit.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:32 PM
  #53  
jsensk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 281
From: Houston
Doods-- PUH-LEEZ take a pill! DT kit will work and be cool-- KW kit will work and be cool-- but really, if you have not already, please look deeply into not just the KW and (hello!) JACKSON RACING design, but the ROTREX concept as a whole. You must agree that there are significant advantages to the ROTREX design (not just KW employment of the design, but FACT that the ROTREX design is used on many of the very most elite super-tuned cars in the world!) That doesn't make ROOTS s/c's and other designs obsolete, but look at the technology too-- not just some silly posts and implied "handling of a situation" on an internet forum.

Competition on niche items like this will ALWAYS be fierce and trust me-- the guys who handle it maturely/professionally on a forum are in the back office cursing that competitor. Who gives a rat's a** about all that? Bottom line is: we want the hottest and best performing s/c! So give the whole "how that company does business" thing a rest, please. Fronting on an internet forum is not the bottom line on how any company does business. Replies to questions on forums by manufacturer's is nothing more than a marketing opportunity in most cases. You generally have no clue what goes on behind the scenes. I know because in my industry I am in the EXACT same position on a ultra-niche product that only my company and one "competitor" carry (in all of N. America).

Drop the "loyalties" and get a little selfish and look for the best product. That immediately ends all of the bickering about this company vs. that company.

Neither of the guys are going to make millions off this very niche product anyway. These types of products are usually developed out of passion, not huge profit hopes.

Too much emotional garbage and not enough tech-discussion kills these threads.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #54  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by 08XR
It seems as though KW has a representative that is too skewed and biased to give any good information on their product.

I did however ask the DT tech guy about the outdated issues such as the tensioner and that it has been updated as with other components that people are saying are outdated when in fact they are not. The only reason they think this is because of word of mouth by one or 2 other people NOT from DT. Oh well, we will see what develops. I plan on reading more into this, as it seems the KW is not giving out all the details on their kit with fair comparison to the DT.






KW has been doing a great job of giving us details on their kit, and all the petty questions everyone has launched at them.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #55  
dank24's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,189
From: NEPA
Originally Posted by Illusive
Alright everyone, this is getting way out of hand. I'm not sure who is who anymore on this forum as I know for a fact that some people are running around with two FF.net identities claiming to be different people. To be honest, I find that very low. I'll be in contact with admin to sort this out. Unfortunately, I don't think everyone is reading into everything that has been going on and are making false assumptions and accusations from both sides.
batman here
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #56  
quangalang's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 667
From: california
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 03:40 PM
  #57  
REXXXXXXXXX's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 805
From: N Jersey
ummmmm.. what?
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:06 PM
  #58  
drzenitram's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 501
From: Wichita, Kansas
Originally Posted by jsensk
Doods-- PUH-LEEZ take a pill! DT kit will work and be cool-- KW kit will work and be cool-- but really, if you have not already, please look deeply into not just the KW and (hello!) JACKSON RACING design, but the ROTREX concept as a whole. You must agree that there are significant advantages to the ROTREX design (not just KW employment of the design, but FACT that the ROTREX design is used on many of the very most elite super-tuned cars in the world!) That doesn't make ROOTS s/c's and other designs obsolete, but look at the technology too-- not just some silly posts and implied "handling of a situation" on an internet forum.

Competition on niche items like this will ALWAYS be fierce and trust me-- the guys who handle it maturely/professionally on a forum are in the back office cursing that competitor. Who gives a rat's a** about all that? Bottom line is: we want the hottest and best performing s/c! So give the whole "how that company does business" thing a rest, please. Fronting on an internet forum is not the bottom line on how any company does business. Replies to questions on forums by manufacturer's is nothing more than a marketing opportunity in most cases. You generally have no clue what goes on behind the scenes. I know because in my industry I am in the EXACT same position on a ultra-niche product that only my company and one "competitor" carry (in all of N. America).

Drop the "loyalties" and get a little selfish and look for the best product. That immediately ends all of the bickering about this company vs. that company.

Neither of the guys are going to make millions off this very niche product anyway. These types of products are usually developed out of passion, not huge profit hopes.

Too much emotional garbage and not enough tech-discussion kills these threads.
Some of us make our decisions based upon how we feel about the specific vendor. For example, I buy everything I possibly can locally from vendors I know and like, rather than saving some money and ordering from a .com or someone in another state or corporation.

Not all of us care if the product delivers another 15 horsepower. I mean, seriously: either way we're still spending $3000 on our cars to run FIFTEENS.

For some of us it's not all about the product, but about the businesspeople selling the product.

So, sorry. Not all of us like to be selfish. I personally like to reward good moral business practitioners.
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:12 PM
  #59  
Illusive's Avatar
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,742
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Originally Posted by drzenitram
Some of us make our decisions based upon how we feel about the specific vendor. For example, I buy everything I possibly can locally from vendors I know and like, rather than saving some money and ordering from a .com or someone in another state or corporation.

Not all of us care if the product delivers another 15 horsepower. I mean, seriously: either way we're still spending $3000 on our cars to run FIFTEENS.

For some of us it's not all about the product, but about the businesspeople selling the product.

So, sorry. Not all of us like to be selfish. I personally like to reward good moral business practitioners.
And having 2 screen names while pretending like one of them is not you so you can make comments without linking your company to those comments is ethical and should be rewarded?!?!
 
Old Mar 19, 2008 | 04:24 PM
  #60  
ToyotaLover's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 688
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by 08XR
It seems as though KW has a representative that is too skewed and biased to give any good information on their product.

I did however ask the DT tech guy about the outdated issues such as the tensioner and that it has been updated as with other components that people are saying are outdated when in fact they are not. The only reason they think this is because of word of mouth by one or 2 other people NOT from DT. Oh well, we will see what develops. I plan on reading more into this, as it seems the KW is not giving out all the details on their kit with fair comparison to the DT.

I based my assumtion on the picture provided on the other thread where the tensioner was a standard pully not an auto tensioner.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:00 AM.