View Single Post
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 02-16-2008, 02:42 PM
tonyd3773's Avatar
tonyd3773 tonyd3773 is offline
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,305
Rep Power: 14
tonyd3773 is a glorious beacon of lighttonyd3773 is a glorious beacon of lighttonyd3773 is a glorious beacon of lighttonyd3773 is a glorious beacon of lighttonyd3773 is a glorious beacon of lighttonyd3773 is a glorious beacon of light
Quote:
Originally Posted by SickFit View Post
I'll have to say pass. If you guys only knew the half of it. Turbos are a bitch to tune and maintain. On the other hand S/C are really easy to maintain and super reliable. I'm sure these guys will make a decent kit, but for that price? Remember, you get what you pay for. Sometimes it does workout for the best but well have to see during their testing of the turbo kits with all those parts put together.

$3500>$1700

I know my math may look a bit screwy. But its not about price. Its about quality and reliability.

I'm sorry...I beg to differ!! Turbo's are not hard to tune and maintain...and they produce far more boost and power then ANY supercharger. You certainly will not see a Supra, Skyline (two of the fastest cars) running a supercharger.....IMO a supercharger is for a select target market.
Not saying they are not good....but certainly NOT a turbo..
Reply With Quote