View Single Post
  #125 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2009, 06:07 PM
mahout mahout is offline
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 2,274
Rep Power: 2868501
mahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by richard612 View Post
I keep seeing "stock pads suck" appear over and over again in this thread. Guys, there's a reason why the stock pads aren't meeting some of your needs. You can't please everyone all of the time -- You can only hope to meet the needs of the largest audience.



Stocks pads must:
  • Not make noise
  • Not eat the customer's rotors
  • Not make noise
  • Not throw off crazy amounts of dust
  • Not make noise
  • Not have corrosive dust
  • Not make noise
  • Work fine at all normal temperatures
  • Not make noise
  • Provide a good service life
  • Not make noise
  • Provide a reasonable friction coefficient (acceptably low pedal effort)
Did I mention that North American drivers will not tolerate ANY noise from their car's braking systems? If your brake temps exceed the capability of the stock pads, call a spade a spade and admit that you're on a racetrack (or are likely a crazy nutjob driver) and need a higher temp pad. Just expect some compromises in the above items.

You left out the most imoportant criteria: they must 'stop damn well, every damn time' no matter how fast or how often. All the rest are merely window dressing.
Reply With Quote