1st Generation (GD 01-08) The one that started it all! Generation specific talk and questions here!

have you acheived 45mpg or higher?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 1, 2013 | 03:29 AM
  #21  
n9cv's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,095
From: Hebron, In
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by CTCT
How do you know how many gallons were in the tank? You can easily add nearly a gallon of gas beyond the tank due to the long fill tube. How do you know the miles covered and what the odometer reads correspond? The error multiplies with each mile.

I do not care how much is in the tank.

I fill the car to the top of the neck, record the current mileage, and drive. Then at the end of the trip I fill it up again to the top of the neck, read the pump, and read the ending mileage. Then I subtract the starting mileage from the ending mileage to determine the total distance driven. Finally I divide the mileage by the total gallons used. How big or small the tank or how much was in the tank before the first fill up has no bearing on the calculation. Actually the Honda odometer which I have calibrated to a GPS and Interstate mile markers has a slight error of about .4% which was measured over a distance of 50 miles to reduce calibration errors. The odometer reads slow but the error is insignificant and I do not bother including it. If I did it would only add another .176 mpg.

That is the way I learned to do it in 6th grade and is how I do it on all of my vehicles including my airplane. The only difference in the air is it is tack hours on the airplane rather than miles. I can also do it in miles in the air but I would have to measure the line of site distance on a sectional, enroute chart, or my GPS rather than reading an odometer. Miscalculating or mis-estimating mpg or miles per tack hour can be disastrous when airborne. Two other variables that enter in the calculation is the wind direction, wind speed, and elevation. Believe it or not these same variables to a lesser extent also enter into mpg on land vehicles. In over 5000 hours of flying I have never run out of fuel. Oh yes, I also have never run out of fuel on a land vehicle.

I am convinced, and my experience tells me, that my calculation methods are correct.
 
Old Jun 2, 2013 | 11:27 PM
  #22  
big Fit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 545
From: U.S.A. PACIFIC NORTHWEST
5 Year Member
this is an old thread but I was reading it any way. The way I figure gas milage ist to fill up then drive to half a tank or beyond then fill again. The amount of gas i put in the second time is the amount of fuel to divid the number of milage driven. basicly I zero my milage counter each time I refill. Thats how I found out my numbers. I do that every time I get gas. I sure miss my 1st gen MT base honda fit. It got 40 on the hwy all the time and seldom went below 38 after break in. Around town was near 35 frequent. It was hard for me to believe I drove a trip 0f 46.4 mpg but I am the only one that fuels the car up.... mmm. why is there such a big difference in that car and the one I drive now that is an automatic? Break in? transmission? car weight? is it just normal variation?
if your a none believer I am sorry to see that. I have found much of what people post is true. Its true even if its subjective. perhaps a few people dont use good technique for counting numbers also.
I find it intresting that I owned a diesle VW and those numbers where consistant but not with the honda Fit. My VW did 40 mpg and more around the city. fifty mpg and more on the hwy
 
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 02:38 PM
  #23  
FitPilot84's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 3
From: Kalamazoo, mi
07' AT GD3 I got 45.3 mpg on a road trip the other week. I was doing 70 when a semi passed me. I followed him for about 240 miles doing 75-80 mph and achieved the 45 mpg. I was surprised and excited. My little fit was smashed when I bought it with 133k on it. Now she's back to looking stock and has 16 inch rims. I love this little car. Typically I see 36-38 on the highway. I even had the ac on for some of the trip that I got 45 mpg.
 
Old Jun 10, 2013 | 03:21 PM
  #24  
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,343
From: Vallejo, Ca
5 Year Member
the further you drive the better the mileage you will get.
 
Old Jun 19, 2013 | 01:44 AM
  #25  
toll's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 23
From: nj
i wish i could get 45mpg!
 
Old Jun 20, 2013 | 03:31 PM
  #26  
ajbruno's Avatar
New Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2
From: Sinking Spring, PA. USA
45-47 mpg

Driving my 2007 Honda Fit Sport back from Binghampton, NY to Reading, PA with my daughter after a volleyball tournament, I was able to attain 47 MPG. And when I regularly go long highway miles, such as to Lancaster or Harrisburg, PA I can get around 45 mpg. That is driving the speed limit (65 mph at some points and 55 mph at others.

However, normal city/suburbs driving I get anywhere from 26 to 32 mpg.

BTW, the only vehicle I owned that got better gas mileage consistently was my Chevy Sprint Plus, which on highways got me over 60 mpg! Of course, it was a 3 cylinder engine.
 
Old Jun 25, 2013 | 05:04 AM
  #27  
hondajazzy1989's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2013
Posts: 5
From: United Kingdom
Mpg

Things may be different here in the UK but My 2005 Honda Fit/Jazz was managing anywhere between 42 and 63mpg.
Even with a heavy foot it would still be just over 40mpg.

Forgive me, i am not aware of the differences between engines and fuel between the UK and US but it does seem a big difference.
 
Old Jun 25, 2013 | 01:34 PM
  #28  
13fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,911
From: Ft.Hood TX // LaCrosse WI
UK spec vehicles are almost always a good chunk lighter in weight, less or no emissions equipment that rob horsepower and engine efficiency, and honda generally is good at using smaller motors for similar performance and purpose

Bottomline, you want your car with our motors lol


If your car is the 1.3liter twin plug per cylinder model, that is a high efficiency model and will get great mileage regardless of the weight of your foot lol
 
Old Jun 25, 2013 | 02:43 PM
  #29  
Wanderer.'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,363
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by Wiki
The imperial gallon

The imperial (UK) gallon, defined as 4.54609 litres, is used in some Commonwealth countries and was originally based on the volume of 10 pounds of water at 62 °F (17 °C). (A US liquid gallon of water weighs about 8.34 pounds at the same temperature.) The imperial fluid ounce is defined as 1⁄160 of an imperial gallon.

The US liquid gallon

The US gallon, which is equal to 3.785411784 litres is legally defined as 231 cubic inches.[1][2] There are four quarts in a gallon, two pints in a quart and sixteen fluid ounces in a pint. In order to overcome the effects of expansion and contraction with temperature when using a gallon to specify a quantity of material for purposes of trade, it is common to define the temperature at which the material will occupy the specified volume. For example, for purposes of trade, the volume of petroleum products[3] and alcoholic beverages[4] are both referenced to 60 °F (16 °C).
Does't thou use the Imperial Gallon for calculations? IDK how it works over there in Britannia.
 
Old Jul 9, 2013 | 01:12 AM
  #30  
teleburst's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 99
From: Nashville
I've got my own MPG tracking thread that I started when I bought my used (99k) Fit last month. I've been overly specific in detailing driving conditions. I only fill up the tank to the first off click of the pump handle, so it's pretty consistent. I've been tracking using Fuelly and have detailed every one of the 10 fill ups that I've made. None of this "I got 45 mpg on the highway the other day" sort of stuff.

I almost got to the 45 mpg mark last week. 44.653. I was <> this close. It was only for 104 miles and 2.33 gallons. I feel pretty sure that had I continued the trip on the interstate, I would have probably broken 45. But that's as far as I went before I had to exit the interstate and drive on back roads. I'm at 29.2 combined with a 60/40 city to highway driving. This is approximate as I don't track down to the mile when it comes to estimating which type of driving I'm doing, but I do keep a rough track of how many miles I'm doing of each (I'd say that there's probably about a plus/minus of 5%). However, in this case, it was, with the exception of the 3 miles it took to get to and from the gas stations from the interstate, 105 highway miles exclusively.
 

Last edited by teleburst; Jul 9, 2013 at 01:15 AM.
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 06:40 PM
  #31  
groupone's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
From: Dallas
I've been tracking my mpg since I purchased my '07 several months back and the last tank recorded 47.9! I was very surprised as the highest I've seen before that was 36. I do admit I employed some hypermiling shenanigans such as coasting as much as possible, timing stoplights so I didn't come to complete stop, and a couple engine off coasts. Roughly 80% of this tank was city driving and I shifted before 3k most of the time although day before I filled up I did a WOT run through 3rd. Really pleased with this car.
 
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 07:10 AM
  #32  
Flyboybob's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 184
From: Dallas, Tx
I have owned my 07 Fit since new and have never gotten mileage above 35 MPG. Usually it is closer to 30 MPG because my wife drives the car on short trips around town with the AC on here in Texas.
 
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 08:55 AM
  #33  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,616
From: .
5 Year Member
Last three tanks have returned me 44.6, 45.8 and 46.7 MPG.

The 45.8 tank was almost entirely my 34 mi round trip commute to work and back. I don't believe people who don't give specific numbers.
 
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 12:51 PM
  #34  
Goldfish's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 2
From: San Francisco, CA
I barely break 32mpg.
 
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 01:19 PM
  #35  
Wanderer.'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,363
From: Hayward, CA
Originally Posted by Goldfish
I barely break 32mpg.
Location: San Francisco, CA

I'm not surprised at all if you live anywhere on the peninsula.
 
Old Aug 22, 2013 | 07:59 PM
  #36  
AdamR's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 3
From: Bowling Green,KY
I think a lot of folks in this thread are giving instant mileage, not average.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
User1
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
36
Aug 3, 2018 02:53 PM
JoeJxn
2nd Generation GE8 Specific Wheel & Tire Sub-Forum
2
Aug 10, 2013 07:46 PM
Boba Fitt
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
45
Mar 18, 2013 02:44 PM
hondafituk
Fit Wheels & Tires
1
Jan 7, 2011 11:54 AM
roenyc
General Fit Talk
148
Nov 7, 2008 05:20 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 PM.