2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Edmunds InsideLine Explores '09 Fit "Green Cred"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 17, 2009 | 11:42 PM
  #1  
txmatt's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 524
From: Dallas, TX
Edmunds InsideLine Explores '09 Fit "Green Cred"

2009 Honda Fit: How Green Is It? | Long-Term Road Tests Blog on Edmunds' Inside Line

Some good comments which I won't inlcude as they will change...
2009 Honda Fit: How Green Is It?



In light of Saint Patrick's Day, I've taken a look at our 2009 Honda Fit's green credentials.
Fuel Economy: As noted in last week's post, our Fit Sport has a 27 mpg city, 33 mpg highway estimate from the EPA. A base Fit with the automatic is a little better at 28/35 mpg.
Tailpipe Emissions: It's rated Bin5 federally -- Bin5 equals a "six" on the EPA's air pollution scale, with a "10" being the highest score for cleanliness. Fits sold in California and other California-emissions states are slightly cleaner with a ULEV rating (a "7").
Are these "green" numbers?
Objectively, I'd say the Fit's fuel economy is pretty good. But 27/33 mpg isn't any better than what the main competition can do, and you can certainly buy non-hybrid cars that are more efficient (a Mini Cooper being one).

The Fit doesn't stand out at all for emissions, either. Just about every significant small car is Bin5/ULEV. Also, some other cars, like the Hyundai Elantra and VW Rabbit, are PZEV-rated (a score of "nine") in California-emission states. VW's new diesel Jetta is Bin5 nationwide.
So, the Fit has pretty good fuel economy but doesn't do anything to advance the game. That's probably sufficient for most people. And maybe if you really want green Honda, you'd just get a new Honda Insight. But if your expectation was that the Honda Fit would somehow be better than everything else (because back in the day, you know, Civic VXs and CRX HFs really were better than everything else for mpg), then the Fit's "green cred" is probably a letdown.

Brent "O'Romans," Senior Automotive Editor
 
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #2  
BakedCookies's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,459
From: VA
It's a shame they go off the lowball EPA numbers, we all know real world results are much higher.
 
Old Mar 18, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #3  
559fitman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 103
From: Fresno, Ca
I feel like I can not read a car magazine without reading about some type of praise for the FIT. I feel sorry for the competitors
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TCroly
3rd Generation (2015+)
13
Apr 17, 2014 05:11 PM
txmatt
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
3
Mar 28, 2009 01:12 AM
TaffetaWhite
General Fit Talk
1
Mar 15, 2009 11:15 PM
fANTOM
General Fit Talk
9
Jul 2, 2008 12:25 AM
KnifeEdge_2K1
General Fit Talk
20
Apr 20, 2007 05:17 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 AM.