2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Tires for 2010 Fit Sport - OEM Rims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 03:27 PM
  #1  
portiz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
From: NY, USA
Question Tires for 2010 Fit Sport - OEM Rims

I need to replace the tires on my 2010 Fit Sport. What sizes fit the stock rims without rubbing, etc.?

Thanks,
Phil
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 05:29 PM
  #2  
Wafulz's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,897
From: Whittier,CA
5 Year Member
run a 205/50/16 much better ride and handling and less weeveing
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 05:38 PM
  #3  
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,288
From: OG Club
5 Year Member
i would keep it stock size since the wheels are so narrow. 185/55/16
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 05:44 PM
  #4  
portiz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
From: NY, USA
Question Thanks!

Thanks for the advice!

Do you know of anyone using 205/55/16's? According to
Tire size calculator
they'd be 0.9" larger in diameter, and 0.4" wider. The increase in diameter would help keep my revs down (thereby increasing highway MPG), but I need to know if they'll rub, scuff, etc.

Thanks,
Phil


Originally Posted by Wafulz
run a 205/50/16 much better ride and handling and less weeveing
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 05:46 PM
  #5  
mkane's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 675
From: Cloverdale,CA
205's here also.
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 06:07 PM
  #6  
Wafulz's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,897
From: Whittier,CA
5 Year Member
No rubs or anything u will be fine bro trust if not ill buy them off u trust when u put that 205 ur gunna be Like DAMM NIce better handling and ride but hey everyone has there 2 cents im just tell u my opinion best mod ever from them gay ass stock tires im use eagle gt Goodyear 205/50/16 and a 205/55 Ohh Noo u will rub or bottum out for sure its real close to the splash guards
 

Last edited by Wafulz; Aug 21, 2012 at 06:12 PM.
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 06:51 PM
  #7  
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,462
From: Vermont
Originally Posted by portiz
Thanks for the advice!

Do you know of anyone using 205/55/16's? According to
Tire size calculator
they'd be 0.9" larger in diameter, and 0.4" wider. The increase in diameter would help keep my revs down (thereby increasing highway MPG), but I need to know if they'll rub, scuff, etc.

Thanks,
Phil
Larger tire likely won't improve fuel economy, just throw off the statistics. the larger tire will be heavier AND the weight will be out further from the center of the hub which means that your engine will have to work harder to turn them. It'll throw off your speedo and odometer and that's about it. Might as well go with a 185/60/16 to get the same effect and they'd be lighter than the 205/55 as they are narrower. They'd still be sloppier in the corners and wouldn't likely return the same fuel economy. (the extra weight will likely counter the size increase.) Also, the 205/50 are likely to be cheaper than a 205/55 so the amount of money you think you save in fuel (and probably don't), will be cancelled by the extra cost of the tire.

Stick with 205/50/16 as there is a large selection. My Hankooks are 205/50 and were $75 each shipped. They are higher performance than the Stock tires and have a longer lifetime rating (Should last me 50K miles vs the 27K miles the OEM Bridgestones gave me). The only time I run larger than stock is my Snows as they were cheaper and raise the FIT 1/2" higher than stock (which is good for winter here in VT).

~SB
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 07:35 PM
  #8  
zilla8's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 544
From: Los Angeles
205/50/16 is the way to go.I'm lowered on Swifts with no rubbing.I get 1-2 better mpg

and the handling is awesome
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 07:38 PM
  #9  
Wafulz's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,897
From: Whittier,CA
5 Year Member
zilla8 u got pics of u lowerd plz
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 08:55 PM
  #10  
portiz's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
New Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3
From: NY, USA
Red face I appreciate the advice!

For my 2008 Fit Sport I needed to bump up the size to get the tires I wanted (Hankook 727H), and I have seen an increase in MPG proportional to the increase in circumference. Although they are heavier than stock, the extra energy required to spin them may be returned during coasting (my cars are both standard trans, during coasting the injectors shut down entirely, so a longer coast is better for overall MPG). It'd be interesting to know if my experience would be borne out in a careful test.

That said, I think I'll go with the 205/50/16s. Which Hankooks did you get? Tirerack has these > Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 < for $79/ea.

BTW, I've quickly become a Hankook fan -- I have them on my 2008 Fit and also my 1996 Miata. They wear great, have good traction wet or dry, and are reasonably quiet. And, since I live in upstate NY (Saratoga -- not far from the VT border), their M+S performance on the Fit (the Miata stays tucked in, far away from road salt) is also impressive.

Thanks,
Phil



Originally Posted by specboy
Larger tire likely won't improve fuel economy, just throw off the statistics. the larger tire will be heavier AND the weight will be out further from the center of the hub which means that your engine will have to work harder to turn them. It'll throw off your speedo and odometer and that's about it. Might as well go with a 185/60/16 to get the same effect and they'd be lighter than the 205/55 as they are narrower. They'd still be sloppier in the corners and wouldn't likely return the same fuel economy. (the extra weight will likely counter the size increase.) Also, the 205/50 are likely to be cheaper than a 205/55 so the amount of money you think you save in fuel (and probably don't), will be cancelled by the extra cost of the tire.

Stick with 205/50/16 as there is a large selection. My Hankooks are 205/50 and were $75 each shipped. They are higher performance than the Stock tires and have a longer lifetime rating (Should last me 50K miles vs the 27K miles the OEM Bridgestones gave me). The only time I run larger than stock is my Snows as they were cheaper and raise the FIT 1/2" higher than stock (which is good for winter here in VT).

~SB
 
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 10:39 PM
  #11  
zilla8's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 544
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Wafulz
zilla8 u got pics of u lowerd plz
Sorry Wafulz no good pics.I have a couple lousy cell pics taken with my old azz flip phone lol

I love the Swifts and RSB and the drop is mild but noticeable 2 fingers front and rear.
 
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 01:09 PM
  #12  
Red 05's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,120
From: Tuscaloosa
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Wafulz
No rubs or anything u will be fine bro trust if not ill buy them off u trust when u put that 205 ur gunna be Like DAMM NIce better handling and ride but hey everyone has there 2 cents im just tell u my opinion best mod ever from them gay ass stock tires im use eagle gt Goodyear 205/50/16 and a 205/55 Ohh Noo u will rub or bottum out for sure its real close to the splash guards
+1 for the Eagle GT's Just mounted a set of 195-55-R16's on my stock rims, night and day difference. My Dunlops were starting to show cords, well past their usefulness.

Goodyear Eagle GT (V-Speed Rated)

Got a damn good deal from Walmart, had them mount, stem and balance the set for 30.00 dollars. The Goodyear in town wanted 93.00 dollars to do the same job.
 
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 02:17 PM
  #13  
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,288
From: OG Club
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Red 05
+1 for the Eagle GT's Just mounted a set of 195-55-R16's on my stock rims, night and day difference. My Dunlops were starting to show cords, well past their usefulness.

Goodyear*Eagle GT (V-Speed Rated)

Got a damn good deal from Walmart, had them mount, stem and balance the set for 30.00 dollars. The Goodyear in town wanted 93.00 dollars to do the same job.
damn!! way da go!
 
Old Aug 22, 2012 | 07:32 PM
  #14  
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,462
From: Vermont
Originally Posted by portiz
For my 2008 Fit Sport I needed to bump up the size to get the tires I wanted (Hankook 727H), and I have seen an increase in MPG proportional to the increase in circumference. Although they are heavier than stock, the extra energy required to spin them may be returned during coasting (my cars are both standard trans, during coasting the injectors shut down entirely, so a longer coast is better for overall MPG). It'd be interesting to know if my experience would be borne out in a careful test.

That said, I think I'll go with the 205/50/16s. Which Hankooks did you get? Tirerack has these > Hankook Ventus V4 ES H105 < for $79/ea.

BTW, I've quickly become a Hankook fan -- I have them on my 2008 Fit and also my 1996 Miata. They wear great, have good traction wet or dry, and are reasonably quiet. And, since I live in upstate NY (Saratoga -- not far from the VT border), their M+S performance on the Fit (the Miata stays tucked in, far away from road salt) is also impressive.

Thanks,
Phil
You've got a 2008? you'll want to go 205/45-16 to keep the overall circumference the same as stock. the GE8 has a larger overall diameter than the GD3 (by 3/4 of an inch). With 205/50, you are off by 2.7% and with 205/55/16 you are off by 6.7% from stock. (about 1.5" larger in diameter)

With 205/45/16 you have 20-30 tires to choose from including some nice ones like the Dunlop Direzzas. I had them on my GS-R which had the same overall diameter wheel/tire as your FIT.

Mine are the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept that I got from DiscountTireDirect. I wanted the long life rating without giving up some handling and I've been very satisfied. currently they are $88 in 205/45/16 which isn't bad but not fantastic. I picked mine up when they had the $100 off a set of 4. That brought mine down to $63 a tire and mounting balancing was $12/tire making the overall cost about $75/tire. The Hankooks seem to be a nice balance of price and performance as I've had one set of snows and one set of All Seasons now. That Said, I like to read reviews before sticking with a specific brand as they all make some great tires.... and they all make some crap.

As for the fuel economy, remember, with the larger tire your Odometer is also off by a certain percentage. when I run my Snow tires, I have to take about 3% off of every mile if I really want actual numbers. he Car may think it's gone 1.0 miles but it's actually gone 1.03 miles which impacts my calculations.

~SB
 

Last edited by specboy; Aug 22, 2012 at 07:37 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
HKDM808
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
2
Apr 14, 2014 11:20 AM
iyn
Tire, Wheel, Brake & Suspension
4
Jul 11, 2010 09:48 AM
alanchan
2nd Generation GE8 Specific Wheel & Tire Sub-Forum
2
Jul 11, 2010 12:49 AM
Santiad
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
3
Feb 5, 2010 08:18 AM
ntercept
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
28
Sep 10, 2009 05:39 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.