3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

GK5's look good with a subtle drop

Old Dec 4, 2014 | 10:05 PM
  #21  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,618
From: .
5 Year Member
Why do you care so much about rear drums?

NONE of the GK owners on this site will ever track their cars.

As such, NONE of them will ever face the actual downfalls inherent in drum brakes.

Instead, they'll reap the rewards of near zero maintenance...and continue to complain about it.
 
Old Dec 5, 2014 | 12:42 AM
  #22  
DArkk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 342
From: Modesto, CA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by mike410b
Why do you care so much about rear drums?

NONE of the GK owners on this site will ever track their cars.

As such, NONE of them will ever face the actual downfalls inherent in drum brakes.

Instead, they'll reap the rewards of near zero maintenance...and continue to complain about it.
Well, for all intent purposes drum brakes is old technology. Granted it works but disc brakes are better even though the front brakes are used 80-90% of the time while the rear is 10-20%. I never actually had to change out the pads on the rear brakes due to low usage.

I think it's more of a visual thing than function to know your car got the "cool" items installed.

If Honda offered rear disc brakes as an option I'd take it due to the cool factor.
 

Last edited by DArkk; Dec 5, 2014 at 12:47 AM.
Old Dec 5, 2014 | 10:19 AM
  #23  
Vanguard's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 690
From: Tennessee
5 Year Member
I'm not certain from an engineering standpoint that rear discs are necessary, for a car the size and weight of the fit. I also like the fact it is cheaper to replace two rotors than it is four.

The idea of wanting them because it is newer technology, is what keeps computer makers in the black. Ten years ago when i was into building my own computers, I got caught up in that concept. I wish I had the thousands of dollars back that i spent on computer upgrades, that I really did not need. I mean, just how fast do you need that spell check to work?
 
Old Dec 8, 2014 | 09:28 AM
  #24  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,618
From: .
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by DArkk
Well, for all intent purposes drum brakes is old technology. Granted it works but disc brakes are better even though the front brakes are used 80-90% of the time while the rear is 10-20%. I never actually had to change out the pads on the rear brakes due to low usage.

I think it's more of a visual thing than function to know your car got the "cool" items installed.

If Honda offered rear disc brakes as an option I'd take it due to the cool factor.
9.1-10.1" brake rotors do not look cool either.
 
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 02:45 PM
  #25  
heybeavis's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 25
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by GeorgeL
It's not just driveways, it's curbs, parking bumpers, and the occasional rock or small creature one encounters on the road. Lowered cars look nice and work a bit better on the track, but having to worry continuously about clearance (also expressed as "being careful") really reduces the fun of driving. I've seen very careful drivers have their day (and spoilers) ruined by an anchor stake protruding a mere quarter inch from a parking bumper in front of my office. I finally brought a sledge hammer from home and whacked it down.

Manufacturers are already dropping cars pretty far simply for fuel economy reasons. Dropping a street-driven car further is really tickling the dragon.

Don't be so dramatic. Tickling dragons, really? A modest drop is of NO consequence. Curbs and parking blocks?? Try not driving into them- as you are literally in control of steering. Slamming cars is useless, but most slammers have air-ride so there goes that argument, and air-ride is way nicer to have as a suspension anyway for a daily driver, let alone that you get to make the stance look better by a couple inches. EoR.
 
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 02:55 PM
  #26  
heybeavis's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 25
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by Vanguard
I'm not certain from an engineering standpoint that rear discs are necessary, for a car the size and weight of the fit. I also like the fact it is cheaper to replace two rotors than it is four.

The idea of wanting them because it is newer technology, is what keeps computer makers in the black. Ten years ago when i was into building my own computers, I got caught up in that concept. I wish I had the thousands of dollars back that i spent on computer upgrades, that I really did not need. I mean, just how fast do you need that spell check to work?
Gaming dude, gaming. If you do not game, then yes you wasted your money, and clearly never understood why you were buying those parts.

Correct about your initial point. The Fit is not a sports car, and due to it's products purpose and GVWR, consumers get a win on future maintenance costs with the rear drums.

For anyone wanting to spend more money than a Mustang GT to turn their Fit into something that will compete with one and look worse doing it, then I am sure aftermarket rear disc conversions will be offered someday by someone.
 
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 08:43 PM
  #27  
A41Billy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 82
From: Medford
Originally Posted by heybeavis
...The Fit is not a sports car, and due to it's products purpose and GVWR, consumers get a win on future maintenance costs with the rear drums.

For anyone wanting to spend more money than a Mustang GT to turn their Fit into something that will compete with one and look worse doing it, then I am sure aftermarket rear disc conversions will be offered someday by someone.
^This. So many on here think they are driving a sports car (especially previous gen owners). That's cool if you want to mod it and make it your own. I am all for that, but realize it's still a Honda Fit. Fun car, but not a performance machine.
 
Old Feb 10, 2015 | 10:11 PM
  #28  
jhn's Avatar
jhn
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 605
From: CD
It's a pretty fun car with sportier suspension. It's not that I don't know what it is; I do - it's an affordable econocar that is easy to work on, has some decent aftermarket stuff that actually makes it handle pretty damn well. A lot of people auto-x these things. It can haul family members, dogs, bicycles (both inside and outside) and then pull down 40+ mpg in the process. Yes, a Mustang might be a bit faster, but is won't do all the practical stuff - at close to half the price.

I like the way they look. I'm not really too fond of the borrowed-from-a-time-past retro styling of the new Mustangs. I did consider getting one, actually. I just didn't think they would suit my needs in a car and bought two Fits instead, lol.

I like the way mine handles with sport springs. I don't have snow or crappy roads though, so all the drawbacks accosiated with a mildly lower car atr not an issue to me.

And if I get tired of it...Hey, I still have the stock parts. I'll just put them back.
 
Old Feb 11, 2015 | 12:43 PM
  #29  
Stingray's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 466
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by mike410b
Pro-Tip: One way to avoid curb/parking bumper damage....park by eye rather than moving until you hit something.
ProTip? Not
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Autotrajikfit
3rd Generation (2015+)
8
Mar 5, 2018 04:08 PM
NickHimSelf
2nd Generation GE8 Specific Wheel & Tire Sub-Forum
12
Jun 11, 2011 09:22 PM
BrianT
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
36
Jun 18, 2009 01:34 PM
Rockrover
General Fit Talk
29
Sep 22, 2008 08:16 PM
tk_jazz
Fit DIY: Repair & Maintenance
2
Dec 22, 2007 01:45 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.