Greddy E-Manage Tuning
#22
naw diesel takes a lot more compression then that....but at this compression i can run alcohol methanol or ethanol....im waiting on e85 to get here already....the drag motors at the shop run on alcohol with 18.0:1 compression...they make about 290whp or about 340hp at the crank...
#25
no...its a fully built bored and stroked b series....fully built k series are making well over 300whp all motor....skunk2 has a prototype k motor making over 400hp n/a....bisi makes over 300hp in his wack sohc setup...
#27
he also cheats....ever wonder why they wont let you know the weight of his car....also if you watch at the tree he preloads and his wheelie bar hits the ground before he launches...wheelie bar touching ground before tree says go is a no no....we tried to get him disqualified for doing it even though its against nhra rules and got blown off by officials...if we preloaded like he does we could shave quite a bit of time off our low 10 seconds runs...
#29
Hmm good points! I'll change that. It's very possible that my bad timing adjustments were "covered up" by the knock sensor retarding. Does this hold even when switching from regular to premium fuel? As in you can run advanced from the stock map in boost, because you're running premium and low boost? Or is it a rule for boost in general?
I'm coming up with a better tune with all of this... I'll upload it before work!
Thanks a LOT for your input!
EDIT:
I adjusted my ignition map to hit 2* retard (from stock) at 8psi, and interpolated into the start of vacuum. Just under 0psi, I think it's about 8 degrees advanced (from stock), and its ~5-7 otherwise (these are the values I was getting with the basemap), increasing as manifold pressure and RPM increase. So, timing increases from idle to 0 vacuum, then decreases in to boost. Sound right?
Thanks again for this info, +rep for you!
I'm coming up with a better tune with all of this... I'll upload it before work!
Thanks a LOT for your input!
EDIT:
I adjusted my ignition map to hit 2* retard (from stock) at 8psi, and interpolated into the start of vacuum. Just under 0psi, I think it's about 8 degrees advanced (from stock), and its ~5-7 otherwise (these are the values I was getting with the basemap), increasing as manifold pressure and RPM increase. So, timing increases from idle to 0 vacuum, then decreases in to boost. Sound right?
Thanks again for this info, +rep for you!
this is typically what a boosted timing map will look like...this is comparable to hondata which is not piggy back
Last edited by artieman; 11-10-2008 at 12:56 AM.
#30
Yeah I know, that's why I said (from stock). Is there something wrong with the numbers I used? Less advance in vacuum maybe? I just took it for a drive, and watched my laptop and the ScanGauge, trying to see if the timing numbers on the scangauge dropped sharply at any point (possibly indicative of knock retard), and it didn't seem to. After pulling timing in the top end in boost and getting my afr's to 12.5-12.7, it actually pulls a lot harder!
I'll consolidate the information we've got here and put it on a new thread. Then we've just gotta petition the mods to sticky it!
#31
typically people disable the knock sensor on boosted setups...the knock sensor is "tuned" for the setup and any changes to the motor makes the sensor no longer accurate....also the knock sensor typically only works between certain rpm ranges and in closed loop....engine harmonics above a certain rpm range will make the sensor useless....
#32
Well damn. I figured the knock sensor would only really be useful in high-load, high-rpm situations, when knock is actually doing damage. I would have thought that they would have been engineered to work in that range.
What would you suggest then, short of just taking it to a dyno tuner?
BTW I made a new thread with our info (and your pictures) consolidated. Let me know if you think something should be changed
What would you suggest then, short of just taking it to a dyno tuner?
BTW I made a new thread with our info (and your pictures) consolidated. Let me know if you think something should be changed
#33
Well damn. I figured the knock sensor would only really be useful in high-load, high-rpm situations, when knock is actually doing damage. I would have thought that they would have been engineered to work in that range.
What would you suggest then, short of just taking it to a dyno tuner?
BTW I made a new thread with our info (and your pictures) consolidated. Let me know if you think something should be changed
What would you suggest then, short of just taking it to a dyno tuner?
BTW I made a new thread with our info (and your pictures) consolidated. Let me know if you think something should be changed
Last edited by artieman; 11-10-2008 at 01:22 AM.
#34
OK that sounds simple enough. I'll see what I can do about finding some dyno time..
Just out of curiosity, what would you do for a street tune? You obviously can't tell the difference close enough to tell what the MBT is, so what do you do to ballpark it?
Just out of curiosity, what would you do for a street tune? You obviously can't tell the difference close enough to tell what the MBT is, so what do you do to ballpark it?
Last edited by explosivpotato; 11-10-2008 at 01:27 AM.
#36
Timing can not be done properly on the street...although ive gotten pretty good at doing it by feel and sound and knowing how to tune and having an insane amount of hours on a dyno....
turbo setups can be just as reliable as stock setups at low boost levels if tuned properly...my friends 96 gsr i tuned here in california makes 426whp at 17psi and he now has moved to vegas and even in 100+ degree weather the car screams and now has considerable mileage on it without one problem....at the track near vegas we run it at 22psi on 91 octane and hasnt skiped a beat yet...but thats a fully built motor...
turbo setups can be just as reliable as stock setups at low boost levels if tuned properly...my friends 96 gsr i tuned here in california makes 426whp at 17psi and he now has moved to vegas and even in 100+ degree weather the car screams and now has considerable mileage on it without one problem....at the track near vegas we run it at 22psi on 91 octane and hasnt skiped a beat yet...but thats a fully built motor...
#38
here is a system used for the miata with with jackson s/c http://www.modacar.com/products/Mazda/Miata/JRAWIC
i would suggest something like this for the fit with the supercharger
Last edited by artieman; 11-10-2008 at 01:44 AM.
#39
i live in washington where the temperature reaches 87 on good days. i would run an air to air intercooler because of the colder temp up here but i want to know which kit seems more realiable. 6psi is about as high as i want to go until i get the boost addiction.
#40
either will be just as reliable if setup properly....