Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Reference Library for Engine Modifications, Swaps and Tuning

I just returned from the dragstrip....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2010 | 11:16 PM
  #41  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Originally Posted by cr4zy3lgato
Ha ha you'll need to show me this when you help me adjust my valves!
I'll bring you my magazines on EFI tuning!!

Marko!!
 
Old Nov 29, 2010 | 08:07 AM
  #42  
cr4zy3lgato's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 759
From: Quebec city
Originally Posted by DOHCtor
I'll bring you my magazines on EFI tuning!!

Marko!!
Ha ha nice! Thanks!!!
Btw i saw yoin traffic this morning just before the bridge... Do you live on the south shore? I moved from val-belair to ste-croix this summer (thats right i'm really close to the riverside speedway now ! We should go to the track together sometime! I just received my ingalls stiffyn and i cant wait to try it and go for a drive!

As for headers, it looks like the DC will be my choice too... Maybe the price difference is only because of mild steel instead of SS
 
Old Nov 29, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #43  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Yeah it's possible, i'm from Charny and i work in Vanier!! We should install your engine damper at the same time we adjust your valves and go for a spin!! As for the DC Header, you wont regret it if you choose that one! Now that my valves are adjusted, i really feel the difference.. while you're at it, you could put some IK22 or BKR6EIX-11 plugs also... They really do a small difference!!

Tell me when you'll want to adjust them and i will check it out... but the best time for me would be in weekends or friday after 5:00pm! Just take notice that the engine must be cold!!

Marko!!
 
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 12:13 PM
  #44  
apexanimal's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,213
From: MI
5 Year Member
i'm also coming from the ptgt/srt4 world...

iirc, the 12.5 afr is the ideal mix for a f/i car... not necessarily an all motor car... i seem to remember that you can safely go leaner on a n/a motor...

the map clamp is a good idea as long as you can monitor your knock and ignition advance... i used to have one on my ptgt and it was a lot of fun... while it does lean it out a bit, the extra ignition advance is very nice - as long as it doesn't knock...

i've been keeping an eye on this...

for mod's on an obd-run car, your best bet is to reset the computer just before a run... it will default and should allow the car to run quicker with more advance...
 
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 12:18 PM
  #45  
cr4zy3lgato's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 759
From: Quebec city
or you could do a OBDI conversion
 
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #46  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Originally Posted by apexanimal
i'm also coming from the ptgt/srt4 world...

iirc, the 12.5 afr is the ideal mix for a f/i car... not necessarily an all motor car... i seem to remember that you can safely go leaner on a n/a motor...

the map clamp is a good idea as long as you can monitor your knock and ignition advance... i used to have one on my ptgt and it was a lot of fun... while it does lean it out a bit, the extra ignition advance is very nice - as long as it doesn't knock...
I think it's dependant on many factors... But i've read at many places that 12.5:1 until torque peak and 13:1 after is ideal in a power Vs. safety point-of-view!!

Marko!!
 
Old Dec 1, 2010 | 02:06 PM
  #47  
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by DOHCtor
I think it's dependant on many factors... But i've read at many places that 12.5:1 until torque peak and 13:1 after is ideal in a power Vs. safety point-of-view!!

Marko!!

"Max power rich" under WOT for N/A pump gas is usually no leaner than 12.5:1AFR, or lambda 0.85v.

This is about as lean as you want to go before there are diminishing returns and detonation becomes a concern. going to 13:1 is not necessarily going to be beneficial or safe, especially in a 10.4:1CR, unless you are running 93 or greater octane (R+M)/2 method.

F/I max power rich is far more dependent on what grade pump gas and compression, but usually between 11.3-11.7:1AFRs.
 
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 07:16 PM
  #48  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Originally Posted by DiamondStarMonsters
"Max power rich" under WOT for N/A pump gas is usually no leaner than 12.5:1AFR, or lambda 0.85v.

This is about as lean as you want to go before there are diminishing returns and detonation becomes a concern. going to 13:1 is not necessarily going to be beneficial or safe, especially in a 10.4:1CR, unless you are running 93 or greater octane (R+M)/2 method.

F/I max power rich is far more dependent on what grade pump gas and compression, but usually between 11.3-11.7:1AFRs.
I agree! But one thing to consider is that after torque peak, cylinder filling is less that before torque peak so chances of detonating are way lessened!! I didn't have the chance to try it by myself on a dyno... This is information that i've got in a magazine that shows how to tune EFI engines the proper way!!

Marko!!
 
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #49  
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
Well every set up is unique, even if the components are identical. Give it a shot! AFRs are just part of the equation though, timing, coolant temp, Air temp, manifold pressure and fuel type/quality all play significant parts.

What I posted is from the mouth of OE calibrators..

They are also the general rules I play by because it errs on the side of caution, which for Daily Drivers and/or expensive builds it is worth it.

Go as aggressive as you want till you start to see 1-2* knock retard, then reel things in a little with a slightly richer mixture and take out a a couple degress of timing.
 
Old Dec 2, 2010 | 11:16 PM
  #50  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Originally Posted by DiamondStarMonsters
Well every set up is unique, even if the components are identical. Give it a shot! AFRs are just part of the equation though, timing, coolant temp, Air temp, manifold pressure and fuel type/quality all play significant parts.

What I posted is from the mouth of OE calibrators..

They are also the general rules I play by because it errs on the side of caution, which for Daily Drivers and/or expensive builds it is worth it.

Go as aggressive as you want till you start to see 1-2* knock retard, then reel things in a little with a slightly richer mixture and take out a a couple degress of timing.
hahah i won't go farther then 13:1 past torque peak when i'm gonna be able to set my AFR like i would! For now i enjoy my car like it is (13.2:1 :\) but i only put Premium on it!! Someday maybe i will scan the article and post it here!!

Marko!
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 03:04 PM
  #51  
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
Here are some books you should buy:
Amazon.com: Engine Management: Advanced Tuning (9781932494426): Greg Banish: Books#_


Amazon.com: How to Tune and Modify Engine Management Systems (Motorbooks Workshop) (9780760315828): Jeff Hartman: Books



Amazon.com: Designing and Tuning High-Performance Fuel Injection Systems (9781932494907): Greg Banish: Books


These will provide a good knowledge base, then you will start to find more technical sources out of your own curiousity, and fill the rest of the gaps with experience! (read: trial and error)

Edit: What are you using to tune your Fit? Do you have a wideband sensor/gauge controller?
 

Last edited by DiamondStarMonsters; Dec 3, 2010 at 04:28 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:22 PM
  #52  
cr4zy3lgato's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 759
From: Quebec city
Do you have a suggestion for which one to get first?
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:27 PM
  #53  
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by cr4zy3lgato
Do you have a suggestion for which one to get first?
Either the first or the third if need be, I like the way Greg Banish breaks down some of the principles of various platforms for beginners. He is an OE calibrator for Ford, and is a professional tuner with his own business outside of that.

I would recommend all 3 at the same time if only because you can cross reference as well as pay shipping only once.
 

Last edited by DiamondStarMonsters; Dec 3, 2010 at 04:29 PM.
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:39 PM
  #54  
SilverBullet's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,304
From: Illinois
5 Year Member
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:44 PM
  #55  
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
I will have to check that out, thanks!
 
Old Dec 3, 2010 | 04:49 PM
  #56  
SilverBullet's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,304
From: Illinois
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by DiamondStarMonsters
I will have to check that out, thanks!
I have all 5 books, just have to find time to read all of them from cover to cover. Not just parts I like.
 
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 10:24 AM
  #57  
jazzista's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 263
From: Zena, Italy
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by DOHCtor
I speaked to some fellow Toyota co-workers that have the exact same problem then me and it seems like the Fit ECU may adapt too well to engine mods...Herman had the same trouble in his 2005 Celica GTS and had to unplug the battery twice at the dragstrip or the ECU would start to figure out there's something wrong and his times would suck! The cure? He changed his ECU to a Apexi Power FC and now the car is consistent!! Sooo, i'm gonna return there next sunday, do a couple of runs and then unplug the battery half an hour and see if it helps! 2003+ Neons would do exactly the same thing but i allready knew that... I just didn't know Fit's ECU would be THAT testy...

I will post my results soon enough!!

Marko!
Ciao Marko!

Similar history here on strange ECU behavior: after anti friction and ILP my mpg improved a lot. Then, in a couple of days, returned to previous values...

Couldn't we wire a gorgeous red hard switch and physically detach the battery every night, to get more performance?
 
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 02:12 PM
  #58  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Originally Posted by jazzista
Ciao Marko!

Similar history here on strange ECU behavior: after anti friction and ILP my mpg improved a lot. Then, in a couple of days, returned to previous values...

Couldn't we wire a gorgeous red hard switch and physically detach the battery every night, to get more performance?
I ordered a AEM FIC piggyback controller! I hope i will sucessfully tune the car with it.... I'm running sightly lean and i don't like that!

Marko!!
 

Last edited by DOHCtor; Apr 6, 2011 at 02:19 PM.
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 02:26 PM
  #59  
cr4zy3lgato's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 759
From: Quebec city
Originally Posted by DOHCtor
I ordered a AEM FIC piggyback controller! I hope i will sucessfully tune the car with it.... I'm running sightly lean and i don't like that!

Marko!!
dang nice! can't wait to see it! do you mind if i ask for how much you got it?
 
Old Apr 6, 2011 | 09:44 PM
  #60  
DOHCtor's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 622
From: Québec city
Originally Posted by cr4zy3lgato
dang nice! can't wait to see it! do you mind if i ask for how much you got it?
290$ minus shipping on ebay!! Needless to say, i jumped on it!!

Marko!!
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 AM.