General Fit Modifications Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

New Mod Made ***7mpg***

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #21  
Snap Fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,783
From: Torrance, CA
Originally Posted by bluecivic107
On another note, the way the ECU responds is differrent from what you stated. If you do a mod like CAI and don't reset the ECU, the air to fuel ratio will be the same. If you reset the ECU, then you will remap you A/F ratio..
Hmmmm... then maybe dont reset the ECU, so you can get increased mpgs?
but...
not so good for emmisions.

I wonder if the emmissions is the major (not the only one though)diff that we observe with our USDM Fits mpg's when compared to others abroad (with regards to same engine and tranny)
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 05:33 PM
  #22  
bluecivic107's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 71
From: Jersey City, NJ USA
IAT Sensor is hanging!!!

This whole thing with MPG increases now makes sense. The OP did NOT make a bung for the IAT sensor in the intake tubing. It's hanging somewhere by the manifold.

The OP got his gains in mpg through engine running lean...not good for the engine....
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 05:43 PM
  #23  
bluecivic107's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 71
From: Jersey City, NJ USA
Originally Posted by Snap Fit
Hmmmm... then maybe dont reset the ECU, so you can get increased mpgs?
but...
not so good for emmisions
Not quite...
The best way to experience gains in performance for mods like intakes, is to reset the ECU after performing the mod...that way, your ECU will adjust for the new mod, ie: different A/F ratio...
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #24  
pastafarian's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 241
From: west virginia
Originally Posted by bluecivic107
The OP got his gains in mpg through engine running lean...not good for the engine....
This might be a retarded question, but what does running lean mean, and why is it bad for the engine?
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 10:16 PM
  #25  
perseverance8@hotmail.com's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 13
From: Ponca City, Oklahoma
Running lean means too low of a fuel to air ratio just as running rich means running too much fuel to air ratio.
 
Old Feb 26, 2008 | 10:27 PM
  #26  
binaryh4x's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 269
From: Fairfax, VA
Lean means that there is not very much gas in the Air/Fuel mixture entering the engine. When this happens too drastically, the engine will "knock", or fire prematurely. That can ruin pistons, rings, valves, rods, etc...
 
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 08:05 AM
  #27  
bluecivic107's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 71
From: Jersey City, NJ USA
Detonation

Running Lean = Detonation, knocking...
Vtec engines have a Knock sensor that will retard timing if detonation is detected.

If your engine is running too Lean, you will experience bogging at WOT...loss of power.
 

Last edited by bluecivic107; Feb 27, 2008 at 09:23 PM.
Old Feb 27, 2008 | 09:51 AM
  #28  
07fitsport's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 959
From: louisiana
the stock airbox may be getting cold air from the fender but the box sit over the radiator hose which is hot right.
 
Old Feb 28, 2008 | 07:54 PM
  #29  
fitsjr's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 16
From: Waldeezy, MD
interesting

Originally Posted by Sid 6.7
Stock, I could not get over 35-36mpg even with an empty car on the highway. Around town, driving agressively, I've gotten as low as 20mpg.

A few days ago I put on my home made $40 short ram.

I was on the road today for 8 hours heading down here to Gulf Shores from Memphis. At one point with some slowing and speeding (and a burst to 100mph to pass a couple trucks) but setting cruise at 75mph, I got 40.5 mpg with about 500lbs total baggage and people. AMAZING!! I never got over 36mpg before this.

Then after that, on a more stable portion about 150 miles long, set at 75mph, I got 43.8mpg!!!!!! I am shocked and amazed.

Here is the thread about my SRI:
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/fit-...am-intake.html




That sucks if its running lean, but if you could make it work without running lean, the Mod its self looks nice, and clean, I can dig it. NEways
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 03:10 PM
  #30  
AppleMac*Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 306
From: Texarkana, TX
Congrats on your homemade SRI!

I made one a while back, too. Who needs to spend lots of money? I even have a K&N cone air filter:

***Also - on the not of IAT sensor - I did install it in the intake - see picture ***
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #31  
Sid 6.7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Why so serious?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,772
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by bluecivic107
This whole thing with MPG increases now makes sense. The OP did NOT make a bung for the IAT sensor in the intake tubing. It's hanging somewhere by the manifold.

The OP got his gains in mpg through engine running lean...not good for the engine....
The IAT wire is very short (maybe 2"). It was never at any point "hanging somewhere by the manifold".

I'm not an idiot. I've been modifying and racing cars since you were wetting the bed.

For the sake of argument, why is running a little leaner a bad thing? It's bad for a forced induction motor, right? Yeah. You want to run fat with a turbo, close to an 11-11.5:1 a/f. When I was tuning my AEM EMS on my 1991 Eagle Talon AWD, I was shooting for an 11.5:1 a/f on my AEM WB-O2. At 20psi on my GT30R and 20 degrees total advance, on 93 octane, I made 470whp. I would have made a few more horses with more timing, or leaning it out, but I would have reached the limit of my Precision 750hp intercooller and started knocking. So I played it safe.

But in an all motor setup, a lot of guys I've seen tune for 13-13.5:1 a/f. Running lean is not a horrible thing.
And regardless IF, IF the car was running a little leaner than before, this motor is a 1.5 liter, low compression, naturally aspirated motor making 85whp. Running 93 octane gas. I couldn't get knock if I hit it with a 10lb sledge!

And IF, IF I traded 5 whp, for 7 more mpg, WGAF? I'll trade 5whp on the highway for 7 more mpg anyday!

The sensor was reading air temps up near the top of the throttle body, under the hood. The SRI has a 90 degree bent tube with a total length of 6", sucking in UNDER-THE-HOOD AIR. I seriously doubt there was much of a difference in the temps at the IAT and the TB.

But, I mounted my IAT in the SRI today using a 5/8" hole saw bit and the factory rubber grommet, so we will now see if that helps/hurts.
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #32  
Sid 6.7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Why so serious?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,772
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
And before someone asks:

Here is my 1992 Plymouth Laser RS AWD Turbo










And here is the 1991 Eagle Talon TSi AWD Turbo I was talking about above:












And a racing vid: MySpaceTV Videos: My Talon AWD Turbo vs 2000 Firebird LS1 by Jay Dog Photog

Both have been sold and gone for a while. Both money pits. The Laser made about 325whp and the Talon made 470whp on pump gas. On race gas, I woould have shot for 600whp. That thing on street tires would cut 1.5 sec 60' times and mid-low 11's in the quarter.
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #33  
Sid 6.7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Why so serious?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,772
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
And here is where the sensor was sitting before I installed it into the bend. It was wedged in between another couple of wires, so it wasn't dangling around.

Not really anywhere near the exhaust manifold.

 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #34  
bluecivic107's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 71
From: Jersey City, NJ USA
WHo give's a F++cK

To the OP...

First, let me say sorry for offending you..There's no need to be defensive...
Second, I could care less what the F you do to your car....
Third, knowing so much as you do, wht don't you pull the plugs to confirm if you're really running LEAN...

Lastly, running lean is NOT good for the engine...running LEAN will lead to detonation...your knock sensor will sense that and the ECU will retard your timing...

SInce, you know about cars, "since I've been wetting my bed", why don't you tell me why that's a GOOD thing...

If it's good for you ....I'm happy for you...
 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #35  
Sid 6.7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Why so serious?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,772
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
Good call. I'll pull the plugs right now and check them.

And running very lean is not good, I agree with that. But this car is pig rich out of the box and running a little bit leaner is not going to blow it up.

We cool, mano.
 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 07:41 PM
  #36  
Sid 6.7's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Why so serious?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,772
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
Looks good. Nice and tan. No dimples or pock marks or metal droplets to indicate detonation. Very slightly oily on one side, but pretty much dry and clean for the most part.

I don't see serious damage happening with a clean plug like this.

 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:13 PM
  #37  
bluecivic107's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 71
From: Jersey City, NJ USA
If you're seeing white on the base of that ground strap, it's showing detonation. It should be somewhere in the middle...
 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 08:24 PM
  #38  
tItAnIuM's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 120
From: Marion, VA
Well, I just did this to my car this morning and my wife did it to hers about an hour ago. They sound nice and look good. Thanks for the idea!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Foots
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
94
Dec 8, 2015 01:04 PM
Boba Fitt
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
45
Mar 18, 2013 02:44 PM
wil524
General Fit Talk
33
Feb 15, 2011 02:29 PM
kennef
General Fit Talk
36
Apr 23, 2010 01:21 AM
Sid 6.7
General Fit Talk
39
Apr 11, 2008 12:26 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.