General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

How fast is your Fit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 01:43 AM
  #21  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
Originally Posted by goodyonsen
dude i totally believe Chris
Oh please lol
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 01:43 AM
  #22  
shazaam's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,013
From: ND
can prove this though....is this you?

YouTube - JDMCHRIS

jk.

but yea, I beleive that a fit can do 0-60 in 5.xx seconds. 40-50hp and what, 30-40 ft/lbs torque gives a 2400lb car a bit more pep than a 3k+lb vehicle
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 01:56 AM
  #23  
kelsodeez's Avatar
UNBANABLE
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,548
From: Af-BAN-istan
5 Year Member
remember that the 1st,2nd and 3rd gear on the fit are geared very differently than most cars. you guys are comparing apples and oranges. 0-60 in 5 seconds is VERY realistic with FI and a good driver.
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 12:51 PM
  #24  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying it isn't possible. What I am saying is a 1/2 second is a huge difference... I just feel skeptical of a 5.3s 0-60 time.

To be honest I get kind of obessive about the 0-60 times for cars more than anything else, which is probably not the right way to look at a car but hey, it is my habit. Here is a list of cars I colleted for comparison about a year ago.

Dodge SRT-4 2004 5.3
Subaru Forester XT 2004 5.3
Ford Mustang GT 2005 5.4
Subaru WRX 2002 5.7
Acura RSX Type-S 2002 6.1
Mazda Speed 3 2007 6.1
Volvo T5 S40 2005 6.3
Volvo T5 S40 - AWD 2005 6.3
Chevy Cobalt SS 2005 6.5
Mitsubishi Eclipse 2000 6.7
Acura TSX 2004 7.1
Acura TL 3.2 2000 7.2
Cadillac CTS 2003 7.2
Saab 92-X 2004 7.2
Subaru Impreza RS 2005 7.2
Mitsubishi Lancer Ralli-Art 2004 7.3
Honda Civic Si 2006 7.3
Nissan Sentra SE-R Spc-v 2004 7.3
Mazda Six 2003 7.5
Mercedes C320 Komp. 2002 7.5
Toyota Corolla XRS 2005 7.5
Ford Mustang V6 2005 7.5
Honda Prelude 2001 7.6
VW Jetta VR6 2001 7.7
Audi A4 3.0 2001 7.7
BMW 325i 2001 7.8
Kia Spectra / 5 2005 8.2
Suzuki Areo 2005 8.3
Toyota Corolla Sport 2004 8.4
Saab "9-3" 2000 8.5
Honda Civic Sig 2002 8.5
Acura EL1.7 2002 8.5
Audi A4 3.0 2000 8.5
Audi A4 1.8T 2001 8.7
Mitsubishi Lancer OZ 2003 9.3
VW Jetta TDI 2005 11.3
VW Jetta TDI 2000 14.7

Now admittedly the Forester is a bit of an anomaly because it has very low gearing and AWD that grabs like you wouldn't believe. But we can take a look at the other FWD car in that list for a comparison. To put this in perspective the SRT4 runs a 1/4 mile typically under 13s... even a few rumors of mid 12's at over 110mph; it goes 0-60 in 5.3 seconds.
 

Last edited by Sugarphreak; Aug 14, 2008 at 01:07 PM.
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 01:36 PM
  #25  
shazaam's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,013
From: ND
lol, this sucks. never wanted to do any perf. mods to the fit but wow. still prolly be cheaper buying a crx with a b18 swap already done though and mod it...but o well :P I want krafts SC
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #26  
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,956
From: Orlando, FL
My Fit has 2 speeds; FAST and WOOOoOO what was that!?
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:29 PM
  #27  
Zangoose GD3 Blue's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,873
From: New York LONG ISLAND
well i went to a drag ( professional course) i was able to keep up with a mazda 3 ( stock) i was on his back bumper.... my next time will be this saturday on a auto X track
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:41 PM
  #28  
kancerr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: DC
Originally Posted by Sugarphreak
To put this in perspective the SRT4 runs a 1/4 mile typically under 13s... even a few rumors of mid 12's at over 110mph; it goes 0-60 in 5.3 seconds.[/FONT][/COLOR][/FONT]

may be with stage 3 turbo installed on the srt4...? friend has stage 2 installed, few other things done and is still mid 12s to low 13s on a GOOD run. dunno how anybody got a stage1 srt4 to get under 13s in the 1/4.

haha thats all i can add to this thread...i know nothing really, just thought i would throw at out there.
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:46 PM
  #29  
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,956
From: Orlando, FL
My friend ran his dads daily SRT4. Completely stock on slicks, it ran a 12.7@105mph
It was an 05. Basically Stage1 as they have more power than 03's
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:47 PM
  #30  
kancerr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: DC
damn really? hes running on stock tires, can it be the slicks that make that big of an improvement? i know its hard for his tires to actually catch stock...
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 06:56 PM
  #31  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
yes slicks can contribute to that time greatly.
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:06 PM
  #32  
kancerr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,105
From: DC
good to know, knew slicks were good, just didnt know how good ;p
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:15 PM
  #33  
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,343
From: Vallejo, Ca
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by TOOL
Ehh not so true heh^

xB(1st gen)
Smart Car
Echo
Yaris
xA
Del Sol

I know im missing some Kia's and Suzuki's too haha.
you are absolutely wrong dude. a del sol is not a slow car. my brother's del sol ran a 14.9 qtr mile when it was stock. and i maxxed mine out at 137mph every morning on the way to work.
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 07:30 PM
  #34  
Spooling's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,019
From: Vancouver Canada
Fast enough to keep up with the new MB C300. although they are not that fast at all...
 
Old Aug 14, 2008 | 10:25 PM
  #35  
suboh's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 37
From: Memphis, TN
Originally Posted by solbrothers
you are absolutely wrong dude. a del sol is not a slow car. my brother's del sol ran a 14.9 qtr mile when it was stock. and i maxxed mine out at 137mph every morning on the way to work.
That's yours. The slowest Del Sol's had a 106hp motor and did 0-60 10-11 seconds.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PITFIT
General Fit Talk
4
Mar 15, 2014 11:57 AM
88StreetDoc
General Fit Talk
26
Dec 25, 2011 12:08 AM
Fitcious
California - Southern Community
65
Oct 28, 2009 10:08 AM
wademunkey
Other Car Related Discussions
12
Jul 26, 2007 04:47 PM
dsk
Other Car Related Discussions
28
Dec 11, 2006 03:15 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 PM.