MANUAL TRANS mileage?
first tank 38.75 combined
second tank 40.3 combined
42 psi cold tire inflated
hard ride for hard gas prices
lots of 1st to 3rd to 5th shifting w/ no apparent lugging
hauled a chair for 50mi
hauled a lawn mower for 80mi
satisfied
second tank 40.3 combined
42 psi cold tire inflated
hard ride for hard gas prices
lots of 1st to 3rd to 5th shifting w/ no apparent lugging
hauled a chair for 50mi
hauled a lawn mower for 80mi
satisfied
34 first tank. 33 (much more aggressive driving) 2nd tank.
BTW i'm at 900 miles. The engine seems WAY faster, and i don't think it's just cuz i'm a better driver now.
BTW i'm at 900 miles. The engine seems WAY faster, and i don't think it's just cuz i'm a better driver now.
right after i started the "auto sport mileage" thread i was wishing i also started this thread to compare... it'll be interesting to the see what comes in for averages and then compare to the auto sport mileage.
mph plz :)
Originally Posted by reddwood
first tank 38.75 combined
second tank 40.3 combined
42 psi cold tire inflated
hard ride for hard gas prices
lots of 1st to 3rd to 5th shifting w/ no apparent lugging
hauled a chair for 50mi
hauled a lawn mower for 80mi
satisfied
second tank 40.3 combined
42 psi cold tire inflated
hard ride for hard gas prices
lots of 1st to 3rd to 5th shifting w/ no apparent lugging
hauled a chair for 50mi
hauled a lawn mower for 80mi
satisfied
and mixed as in 50% city 50% hwy? or your not sure? hehe
Originally Posted by reddwood
sw PA hills and valleys
20 - 50 mph 75%
interstate
60 - 70 mph 25%
seems to me just a bit testy reply from an omnipotent salesperson
20 - 50 mph 75%
interstate
60 - 70 mph 25%
seems to me just a bit testy reply from an omnipotent salesperson
im just curious for myself
thats all...
I don't understand how the MT is able to get better mileage than the AT, especially when you're cruising at a higher RPM....but in anycase, I'm glad to hear it. By the way, does the high RPM bother you guys when cruising on highways/freeways?
Originally Posted by Bukwheat
By the way, does the high RPM bother you guys when cruising on highways/freeways?
The day they come in, I'll be there to buy the first!
Hear that, Christina Ra?
lmao @ 6th gear
Originally Posted by fit_ness
I'm forever reaching down to shift into sixth gear.
The day they come in, I'll be there to buy the first!
Hear that, Christina Ra?
The day they come in, I'll be there to buy the first!
Hear that, Christina Ra?
Originally Posted by buttahball
109hp with 6 gears...lol, prolly wouldn't be too useful

4900 rpm @ 80 mph is ridiculous. Plenty of room and use for a much taller overdrive sixth gear.
Originally Posted by Bukwheat
I don't understand how the MT is able to get better mileage than the AT, especially when you're cruising at a higher RPM....but in anycase, I'm glad to hear it. By the way, does the high RPM bother you guys when cruising on highways/freeways?
Philippe
Last edited by phil_qc; May 22, 2006 at 08:46 AM.
Originally Posted by Bukwheat
I don't understand how the MT is able to get better mileage than the AT, especially when you're cruising at a higher RPM....but in anycase, I'm glad to hear it. By the way, does the high RPM bother you guys when cruising on highways/freeways?
Originally Posted by fit_ness
You obviously haven't driven a manual Fit at highway speeds much!
4900 rpm @ 80 mph is ridiculous. Plenty of room and use for a much taller overdrive sixth gear.
4900 rpm @ 80 mph is ridiculous. Plenty of room and use for a much taller overdrive sixth gear.
Originally Posted by fit_ness
You obviously haven't driven a manual Fit at highway speeds much!
4900 rpm @ 80 mph is ridiculous. Plenty of room and use for a much taller overdrive sixth gear.
4900 rpm @ 80 mph is ridiculous. Plenty of room and use for a much taller overdrive sixth gear.



