General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

drop in gas milage!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:47 AM
  #1  
tershel's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 103
From: Vancouver,canada
drop in gas milage!!!!

hey guys.

since i put on new wheels and rubber on my fit(205/40/17)my milage seems to have drop from 430kms on a full tank to 375kms(full tank).
i had the stock 14" wheels before the big drop.
anyone know if im losing gas milage or is my speedometer going slower.

thanks for any replys
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 02:37 AM
  #2  
kgb4187's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 353
From: Southern Oregon
5 Year Member
Its the bigger heavier tires. Same thing happened when I put heavy 17s on my Subaru. Went down to 16s and got alot of mileage back. (Stock size was 15)
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 03:24 AM
  #3  
BKKJack's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 507
From: NOVA
It's probably a combination, but more attributable to the heavier wheel/tire combo. If my formulae are correct, your 205/40-17's are 2.13% larger in circumference than your stock 175/65-14's. That would throw your speed/odometer off by the same amount, relative to the stock tires. Your drop in gas mileage is about 13%. Did you have an opportunity to weigh both the stock and new wheel/tire combinations? Overall weight will be a part of the equation. Additional rolling and aerodynamic resistance from the wider tires will account for the rest.

Most important question is: HOW DO THEY LOOK?
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 08:22 AM
  #4  
sillypuddy's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 711
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
it's the bigger, heavier, wider tires that is sucking up your gas

-joe
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 08:46 AM
  #5  
rudy's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 18
From: boston, ma
17's? Man, I was planning on selling the 15's that come on the sport and getting some proper, lightweight 14's. The wheel just has to be big enough to clear the brakes.
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #6  
sLiVeRwOrM's Avatar
Four Wheels Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,460
From: Austin TX, USA
yeah, i have noticed a drop in gas after installing these 17s
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #7  
spreadhead's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,104
From: Chattanooga
Originally Posted by tershel
is my speedometer going slower.

thanks for any replys
You can use this http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html to figure the speedo thing.
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 10:48 AM
  #8  
FikseRxSeven's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 86
From: easton, pa
yes, wider tires suck up gas milage,

i switched from 225/50/16 to 285/40/17 on my rx7 and my gas milage went down by 2-3 miles per gallon on the highway, and way more in the city
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 11:11 AM
  #9  
Spule 4's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 577
From: USA
Also, the standard 14" Dunlops are a low rolling resistance tire, designed with economy in mind. Fuel economy or vanity, weigh out the costs of both......
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #10  
mexellent's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 137
From: arlington texas
Originally Posted by rudy
17's? Man, I was planning on selling the 15's that come on the sport and getting some proper, lightweight 14's. The wheel just has to be big enough to clear the brakes.
Amen to that. Although I would probably go with 15's just for aesthetics. Surprisingly enough you can get alot of BADASS tires for a 14x6 wheel. Too bad there arent very many badass 14x6 wheels.
 
Old Aug 5, 2006 | 12:36 AM
  #11  
Bill L's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 179
From: San Jose, CA
There are a few (but not many) 14 x 6 wheels at tirerack.com -- I got the Borbet CA's & have been quite happy with them, but if you want lightweight, try the Kosei TS at < 9.5 lb each.
 
Old Aug 5, 2006 | 01:47 AM
  #12  
marokero's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 215
From: Long Island, NY
I switched my stock 15's with 16x7 Spoon SW388 and Yokohama AVID H4S 205/45-16. The milage started at around 28-29mpg from my calculations after the first fill-up (I swapped in the Spoons on the same day I got my Fit). Maybe because of the heat wave, my lead foot, or both, but my current milage sits at 24-25mpg! The SW388's are pretty light at 11.9lb each, but the tires are the usual weight for a 205/45-16. But it's still much better than what my Toyota 4Runner was getting: 15-16mpg. Hopefully after my first oil change and once the heat waves goes away my milage will improve. Sucking hot air doesn't help the a/c work any more efficiently either.
 
Old Aug 5, 2006 | 12:47 PM
  #13  
Spule 4's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 577
From: USA
Originally Posted by marokero
I switched my stock 15's with 16x7 Spoon SW388 and Yokohama AVID H4S 205/45-16. The milage started at around 28-29mpg from my calculations after the first fill-up (I swapped in the Spoons on the same day I got my Fit). Maybe because of the heat wave, my lead foot, or both, but my current milage sits at 24-25mpg! The SW388's are pretty light at 11.9lb each, but the tires are the usual weight for a 205/45-16.
All:

First, I am amazed at the MPG a lot of you are reporting, even in city traffic with full A/C, my alltime worst is 32.5 mpg. Best was 43 mpg (all highway on a long trip).

Honestly, nuts to wheel weight (and yes, Garrett knows that unsrprung weight is a factor, but not much on this).

Read my earlier post, you have removed the factory Low Rolling Resistance tires that were sent with the cars and replaced them with a performance tire.

From (forum sponsor) Tire Rack:

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=29

"Now, lets explore a scenario where a High Performance replacement radial tire has a whopping 20% increase in rolling resistance over a low rolling resistance Original Equipment standard passenger radial. To calculate the potential change in mpg resulting from using the High Performance tires in place of the Original Equipment tires, we would multiply the tire's percentage of influence in the vehicle's overall resistance (15% in the city and 25% on the highway) times the High Performance tires' 20% increase in rolling resistance.

If the vehicle equipped with standard Original Equipment low rolling resistance passenger tires normally provided 25 mpg in the city and 30 mpg on the highway, installing tires with 20% greater rolling resistance would only drop fuel mileage by a calculated 3% (to 24.25 mpg) in the city, and a calculated 5% (to 28.5 mpg) on the highway. While this is a measurable difference, it probably isn't much more of an influence on real world fuel economy than being stuck in rush hour traffic a couple of times a week or being stopped at every red light instead of continuing through a string of green lights."

So a sticky tire with a bigger contact spot on the road is going to cause an impact.

If you want a sticky performance tire, then fine, but mileage will be impacted. If you have a need for these such as autocross or the like, then go for it, but it does not make much sense for running five miles down the road to the Big Box Mart....

Due to the amount of driving I do, I think if I wanted alloys, I would stick to 14" or 15" with LRR tires.

The big question is, how will these tires (LRR) do in ice and snow?
 
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 01:49 AM
  #14  
marokero's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 215
From: Long Island, NY
My Yokos can't be that sticky, they are only "high" performance all weather, not "ultra high" or better summer tires. I had the same rims on my Civic and Yokohama A520's all around. The Civic was rated at 32/37mpg, but after putting the new rims and tires I actually got 38mpg traveling from CT to NY one night. Granted, it was a manual, not automatic, and I didn't have VTEC then. If I can ease off the gas pedal and keep the revs below VTEC range, I can probably get the sticker mpg rating. But it will be very slow accelerating... I have no complaints about the milage, I know I'm to blame (the driver) for the poor mpg I've been geting out of the Fit
 
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #15  
FondaFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 606
From: Palm Bay, FL
I did a long road trip, stayed a week and did short daily drives that included highway and lots of in-city driving and got about 32 mpg (AT) overall. On my daily, increasingly frustrating highway/stop-and-go commute, I only get about 30 mpg. Can't figure out why the difference.
 
Old Aug 6, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #16  
rudy's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 18
From: boston, ma
Originally Posted by Spule 4
So a sticky tire with a bigger contact spot on the road is going to cause an impact.
Bigger/wider tires don't increase the contact patch - they merely change the shape. The total surface area is basically the weight of the car divided by the tire pressure.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mooser1454
General Fit Talk
1
Nov 24, 2018 07:20 AM
phenoyz
General Fit Talk
36
Jun 10, 2011 05:13 AM
Mzzchief
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
9
Jul 23, 2010 10:27 PM
Fit of RAGE
Fit Wheels & Tires
9
Jan 24, 2008 01:11 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:06 AM.