Other Car Related Discussions Discuss all other cars here.

outlander gt

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 26, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #1  
kennef's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 604
From: washington, dc
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 02:31 AM
  #2  
Type 100's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,888
From: Parañaque City, Philippines
5 Year Member
Technically it's a Lancer in SUV drag. That would explain why you don't hate it. Their dashboards are pretty much identical.

My dad drives a CY4A Lancer and it's not a bad car at all, just a little heavy and with obvious cheap plastics/poor finishing.
 
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 02:57 PM
  #3  
kennef's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 604
From: washington, dc
i was just heavily surprised that the outlander could do some legitimate softroading. seems like the outlander and the forester are the only two in the segment that can actually handle something more challenging than rain. at least according to a friend that absolutely can't stand the way his CRV's part time awd engages in a reactive manner. haven't heard much about the rav4's off pavement capability.

on road, the outlander was a big surprise. i thought the forester handled pretty well until i got a test drive in the outlander. forester xt's motor was clearly superior to the GT's v-6, and would definitely outgun it with basic mods and beyond. but i have a feeling that the awd in the outlander is just seriously superior.
 

Last edited by kennef; Apr 27, 2010 at 03:00 PM.
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 03:15 PM
  #4  
kennef's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 604
From: washington, dc
i lol'd at the slalom speed.

IL Track Tested: 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander GT

BMW X6 M: 68.6
2010 Outlander GT: 66.2
Mercedes C Class: 65.8 - (car)
RDX: 65.7
Cayenne Turbo X: 65.2
MB ML63 AMG 64.4
BMW X3: 64.4
07 Outlander XLS: 63.9
BMW X5 M 63.5
MDX: 62.6
LR2: 62
Audi Q5: 61.9
RAV4 LTD: 61.6
MB GLK: 61.3
Forester 2.5XT: 60.3
Murano LE: 59.2
MB ML350: 57.5
Lincoln MKX: 57.3
 
Old Apr 27, 2010 | 08:21 PM
  #5  
Type 100's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,888
From: Parañaque City, Philippines
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by kennef
i was just heavily surprised that the outlander could do some legitimate softroading. seems like the outlander and the forester are the only two in the segment that can actually handle something more challenging than rain. at least according to a friend that absolutely can't stand the way his CRV's part time awd engages in a reactive manner. haven't heard much about the rav4's off pavement capability.

on road, the outlander was a big surprise. i thought the forester handled pretty well until i got a test drive in the outlander. forester xt's motor was clearly superior to the GT's v-6, and would definitely outgun it with basic mods and beyond. but i have a feeling that the awd in the outlander is just seriously superior.
Regarding the RAV4:
I'm not sure if it's been ditched by now, but we had a first-generation 1996 three-door model and it had a center diff lock switch supposedly good for low-speed crawling up to 15 km/h (practically walking pace).

I think the current one still has it. FYI :)
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bensenvill
General Fit Talk
4
Jul 23, 2015 08:49 AM
hogwylde
General Fit Talk
16
Mar 9, 2014 04:50 PM
Subie
Other Car Related Discussions
8
Oct 10, 2012 01:10 PM
Cat
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
9
Jul 10, 2010 01:51 PM
TOOL
Other Car Related Discussions
25
Jan 18, 2008 04:30 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 PM.