Site Feedback and Suggestions If you have any suggestions or want to see something voice your opinion in here.

signature pic sizes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 07:00 AM
  #1  
sillypuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 711
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
signature pic sizes

I am on ultra highspeed dsl, and even for me, sometimes the posts take forever to load.

some guys are putting 200-250k pics into their signatures..

there should be some limit on both display size and file size..

-joe
 
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 08:40 AM
  #2  
robwahoo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 178
From: NOVA
agreed. we are the process of doing a number of other changes, and will add this to the list.
 
Old Dec 13, 2006 | 08:55 AM
  #3  
sillypuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 711
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
thanks for listening ..

-joe
 
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 11:21 PM
  #4  
WhatFreshHell's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 282
From: Salem, Ma
Dunno if this every went into place.

I notice that some people have huge (for signatures) pics. A Lot of times they become distracting from the post itself.
 
Old Mar 19, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #5  
NaTuReB0Y's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 344
From: Southern Cal
Sorry...........
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 02:21 AM
  #6  
Elem3nt's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 121
From: Stockton
my sig use to be big but i chopped it down to make it smaller
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 10:59 AM
  #7  
robwahoo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 178
From: NOVA
Thanks for the tip

Excellent tip Claymore. Some people love signatures. Other people hate them.
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:10 AM
  #8  
WhatFreshHell's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 282
From: Salem, Ma
I just went and shut off images.

I guess it is a compromise. It just makes it annoying for real posts that have images in them.

I know other sites limit the size of signature pics (just like how the avatar is limited in size).


If shutting off images/signatures is our only option, I am just curious as to why there doesn't seem to be a limit to the sig pics?

*EDIT* I just had an idea. How about the ability to shut off images in just the signature?
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 11:11 AM
  #9  
robwahoo's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 178
From: NOVA
I just added the following in the newbie-faqs section:

https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/fit-...tml#post126852
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 12:01 PM
  #10  
WhatFreshHell's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 282
From: Salem, Ma
Originally Posted by robwahoo
I just added the following in the newbie-faqs section:

https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/fit-...tml#post126852
I see.

I guess I will just have to live with some people having large sigs. No sigs means you don't even get the links that people have, which sometimes are actually helpful. No images means that every time someone post a pic you have to click on the link.

Oh well... it seemed like a good idea when sillypuddy first suggested it.
 
Old Mar 20, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #11  
WhatFreshHell's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 282
From: Salem, Ma
Originally Posted by claymore
You guys are missing it. There are three DIFFERENT check boxes, just uncheck ONLY the one marked SHOW SIGNATURES and leave the show images, and show avatars check marks and then ONLY the signatures will not show but you still get photos with the posts.

I am not missing it.

Like I said. That will remove ALL of the signature, so you don't even get the text, and I find that people sometimes have interesting links in their signatures.

What I had suggested was that, if you weren't going to limit people on their sig pictures as the OP suggested, then perhaps we could have a fourth option of removing only the pictures in signatures. So that you could still see people's signatures, but not be cluttered by the oversized images.
 
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #12  
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,956
From: Orlando, FL
Im still noticing gigantic sig pics. Not only that, some people have HUGE pics and then a list of mods after. Doesnt this steal site bandwidth?

Some of these sig pics are so big I think theyre actually POSTED pics.
 
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 01:44 AM
  #13  
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Push My Button
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 4,997
From: Calgary, Alberta
I use a web-optimizing program that does a great job, it dosn't distort the picture enough to notice but man does it ever shink the size down. My sig is only 15kb and it measure up at 600x159 pixels.

As an example I took Mx6GT89's sig and reduced it by half
(I hope you don't mind Mx6GT89 , pm me if you want my to take the example down).
Right click the properties to see the file size. See if you can see a major dif in the quality.



If anybody wants their sig opitmized let me know
 

Last edited by Sugarphreak; Aug 27, 2007 at 01:52 AM.
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 01:46 AM
  #14  
aznguyen316's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 445
From: Tampa, FL
5 Year Member
nice optimizer.. haha I agree about the sig sizes. I'm not annoyed as much as the file size more than the actual pixel size. I hate seeing a huge sig pic in a thread that just takes over everything, almost as if it were a pic thread! lol I think max size should be introduced.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smatts
Site Feedback and Suggestions
32
Mar 29, 2008 05:07 PM
dank24
Site Feedback and Suggestions
1
Mar 4, 2008 12:57 PM
kentris
Site Feedback and Suggestions
5
Aug 19, 2006 04:43 PM
Popeye
Site Feedback and Suggestions
6
May 5, 2006 01:19 PM
Jonniedee
Site Feedback and Suggestions
2
Feb 7, 2006 04:35 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:06 PM.