Fit FREAK.net

Go Back   Unofficial Honda FIT Forums > The Honda Fit and Jazz Forums > ECO-Fit Discussion

ECO-Fit Discussion Threads discussing the pursuit of ultimate economy, hypermiling techniques & maximizing your MPG

Welcome to Fit Freak!
Welcome to Fit Freak,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 04-28-2008, 02:55 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 119
Rep Power: 0
smirff07 is an unknown quantity at this point
gas and food from the same place is a bad idea, just look at your grocery bill. we rely on corn as much as fossil fuels. now both food and gas from the same source!? we pay more and assholes some where get richer. things gotta break soon. hopefully the transition is smooth, whatever happens.
__________________
I Love My Little Blue Nugget
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 03:17 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 3
Deanwvu will become famous soon enough
This is semi-off-topic, I know...


Biofuels are temporary. They will be gone in no more than 10 years, maybe sooner. Hopefully oil and gasoline will be gone as well.


The real future is all-electric cars with quick recharging connected to a grid supplied by solar/wind/nuclear power plants.


Ya know, stuff our government could easily invest in right now.. but wait, we got a war that has cost 520 BILLION dollars, and should hit a trillion before its over...

I bet a trillion dollars could've built a few productive solar/nuclear plants or a few thousand off-shore wind turbines, whatcha think?
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 03:27 PM
dank24's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (-2)
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NEPA
Posts: 1,236
Rep Power: 18
dank24 is a splendid one to beholddank24 is a splendid one to beholddank24 is a splendid one to beholddank24 is a splendid one to beholddank24 is a splendid one to beholddank24 is a splendid one to beholddank24 is a splendid one to behold
Send a message via AIM to dank24
Quote:
Originally Posted by smirff07 View Post
gas and food from the same place is a bad idea, just look at your grocery bill. we rely on corn as much as fossil fuels. now both food and gas from the same source!? we pay more and assholes some where get richer. things gotta break soon. hopefully the transition is smooth, whatever happens.
Have you been watching the news at all? The world is in a starvation already. They are cutting back rice portions and all.
__________________





Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 03:27 PM
Stevens24's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 254
Rep Power: 11925
Stevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to liveStevens24 relies on Rep Points to live
The war has very little to do with the lack of investment. oil lobbyist and some farming groups do.
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2008, 03:37 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Posts: 106
Rep Power: 3
Deanwvu will become famous soon enough
My only point is... our tax dollars go SOMEWHERE.

The politicians make awful choices as to where those dollars go.... Get rid of oil altogether in the US (Brazil did it--in what--10 or 20 years?), and the middle east can blow each other up all day if they like.

I sometimes just feel that large-scale science and public works programs in the US are gone forever.... The Panama Canal, the Hoover Dam, the US Highway System, the development of the Atomic Bomb (the Atomic Age, really), and putting men on the moon... All those projects were done relatively quickly. The energy problem is certainly more complicated, requiring many technologies and changes over a broad scale, but completely within CURRENT human ability.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 05-06-2008, 03:02 PM
New Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somewhere, VA
Posts: 4
Rep Power: 0
shumster441 is an unknown quantity at this point
Don't forget that a lot of manufacturing processes require oil for production. Plastics, Rubber tires ....Etc. ...etc

We need more of a re-education of the masses so that our enviromental problems and dependency on oils can be halted quickly.
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 05-23-2008, 02:29 AM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Orange County
Posts: 554
Rep Power: 3594
ToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to liveToFit2Quit relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deanwvu View Post
My only point is... our tax dollars go SOMEWHERE.

The politicians make awful choices as to where those dollars go.... Get rid of oil altogether in the US (Brazil did it--in what--10 or 20 years?), and the middle east can blow each other up all day if they like.

I sometimes just feel that large-scale science and public works programs in the US are gone forever.... The Panama Canal, the Hoover Dam, the US Highway System, the development of the Atomic Bomb (the Atomic Age, really), and putting men on the moon... All those projects were done relatively quickly. The energy problem is certainly more complicated, requiring many technologies and changes over a broad scale, but completely within CURRENT human ability.
Naw, I don't think they should completly get rid of oil and gasoline. They should just add more alternative systems like electric cars, nuclear power, bio fuels, bio deisels... etc. Think about it. If only 25% of people use electrical cars, only 25% use bio deisel, and 25% of people use gasoline, and the rest of the 25% uses deisel#2 fuel. Wouldn't that drive demand down for all four category? But then at the same time, if you only stick to one category, you're practically screwed if there's a overnight price hike. LOL Nobody likes to be the sucker that pays the higher price of the four, that's for sure.
__________________
The Fit is GOLD!
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 07-06-2008, 10:21 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 0
litesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcs0snq View Post
Looking at the Motor is just a small view of the system.........

Do you know the efficiency of the average electric power plant, including the transmission and distribution to get that power to your house and than the loss of energy in the battery chargers? to replenish car Batteries?

I hate to bring you bad news, but if you look at that side, with real data, you'll find that is no better that that low eff ICE.

Here's some reading to help better understand the misconceptions.

http://www.npc.org/Study_Topic_Paper...Efficiency.pdf

Diesel vs. Gasoline

and this one

The Battery Powered Car

The fact is most don't consider or understand the true efficiency of converting that fossil fuel into the power used to change a car battery. They just look at the new power plants and do not consider all the losses between the plant and the battery. By far the majority of generation in the North America is 30 year old low efficiency and dirty emission units. Another detail is fossil fired power generation is king and will be for some time. Cost to build new power generation drive this. Solar and wind are a trivial few now and by all real predictions into the future.


I considered much more than the 3 to 1 efficiency of the electric motor to ICE. That 4% pollution figure I quoted entails the actual renewable electric generation factor. Another factor lowering that 4% even more is that electricity, KW to HP is delivered to outlets more efficiently than liquid fuels are delivered to gas stations. A 6 pound gallon of fuel mixes with oxygen in the air, causing 19 pounds of carbon dioxide to form plus other pollutants. But considering the fuel NEEDED to transport fuel to gas stations, 1 gallon of fuel actually causes 28 pounds of carbon dioxide plus an equivilent increase in other pollutants.

A factor not considered often in the use of electricity to take over traditional jobs of ICE, is that KW to HP, gasoline tankers are replaced by transmission lines freeing up a bit of our over-congested highways.

AFTER all the above, THEN the 3 to 1 efficiency factor of the electric motor over the ICE comes into play.

May ICE die an economic death in favor of the electric motor that people will live free of the fine & nano particles produced & emitted by ICE. Only now are preliminary but devastating health studies beginning to show the tragic results on human bodies of the smallest particles emitted from ICE.

Last edited by litesong; 07-06-2008 at 10:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 07-08-2008, 03:52 PM
Sugarphreak's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 4,776
Rep Power: 42949679
Sugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to liveSugarphreak relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by litesong View Post
May ICE die an economic death in favor of the electric motor that people will live free of the fine & nano particles produced & emitted by ICE. Only now are preliminary but devastating health studies beginning to show the tragic results on human bodies of the smallest particles emitted from ICE.
...says the guy who owns not one, but two cars. One of which is a spanky new gas guzzling Dodge Caliber.

You do realize everytime a forest fire occurs or a volcano erupts it puts many more particals into the atmosphere than every car in North America does in a year. Good luck with your partical free bubble dome idea.
__________________
For a jolt of pure awesome... just click the sugarphreak button!

Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2008, 09:11 PM
jits14's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: milwaukee, WI
Posts: 741
Rep Power: 6
jits14 has a spectacular aura aboutjits14 has a spectacular aura about
Its funny and a little OT but today I heard that not only have the sea levels stopped rising lately, but the "AL GORE scientific supporters" are claiming that by 2015 we will be going into a global cooling. This just supports the fact that the climate and global pattern is an ebb and flow of temperature.

"All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA’s GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.
Meteorologist Anthony Watts compiled the results of all the sources. The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C — a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years. All in one year time. For all sources, it’s the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down."
__________________
_________________________________________________

Last edited by jits14; 07-09-2008 at 09:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 07-09-2008, 10:00 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 2,272
Rep Power: 2868501
mahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by dank24 View Post
yea, but I just want to use it because it is not as harmful as gasoline. Something like it does not exert 40% as much emissions as gasoline
When you include the emissions and CO2 from the machines that are nevcessary to produce E85 the ratio goes negative. Takes more than it saves.
Besides E85 is not useable in Fits; the high alcohol content ears gaskets alive. Its barely acceptable at 10%.
And of course when you consider the mpg is barely half that on gasoline the whole idea is a loser. There is no free lunch.

Last edited by mahout; 07-09-2008 at 10:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2008, 05:11 PM
Rockrover's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 128
Rep Power: 3
Rockrover will become famous soon enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by jits14 View Post
"All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA’s GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.
Meteorologist Anthony Watts compiled the results of all the sources. The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C — a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years. All in one year time. For all sources, it’s the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down."

Yup very true. Why do you think that the 'Warmon' faith movement (a 'Warmon' is someone who practices Warmonism) has quietly changed from "global warming" to "climate change"? Hard to continue funding/grants to scientists that are studying the effects of 'warming' when we're 'cooling'.

Sounds like we're talking about the weather doesn't it? Yea right, we're talking about dollars.

--D
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by dewthedew View Post
$240 is kinda pricey for something you dont even see.
2008 MR SportAT

Tint:
5% Sides and rear
25% Fronts
35% Windshield

Best Tank: 46.3 mpg
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 07-18-2008, 11:43 AM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 2,272
Rep Power: 2868501
mahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by jits14 View Post
Its funny and a little OT but today I heard that not only have the sea levels stopped rising lately, but the "AL GORE scientific supporters" are claiming that by 2015 we will be going into a global cooling. This just supports the fact that the climate and global pattern is an ebb and flow of temperature.

"All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA’s GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.
Meteorologist Anthony Watts compiled the results of all the sources. The total amount of cooling ranges from 0.65C up to 0.75C — a value large enough to erase nearly all the global warming recorded over the past 100 years. All in one year time. For all sources, it’s the single fastest temperature change ever recorded, either up or down."
And did you know that the 3 sigma variation in the average temperature since the 1800's of the earth is +/- 4.2 degrees. Which means that any temperatures that fall in that range across the avaerage is not significant.
People whio try to design trends with 3s are simply playing games or trying to win free government money (grants) by predicting maydays.
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 01:25 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 0
litesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sugarphreak View Post
...says the guy who owns not one, but two cars. One of which is a spanky new gas guzzling Dodge Caliber.

You do realize everytime a forest fire occurs or a volcano erupts it puts many more particals into the atmosphere than every car in North America does in a year. Good luck with your partical free bubble dome idea.
Volcanos occur around the world. You must compare volcanos to all world wide man-made emissions covering all man-made activities. Just one man made emission, carbon dioxide, puts 30 billion tons per year (3 thousand thousand thousand thousand tons per century) into the atmosphere. Volcanos are a natural emission & the earth's balance of nature accounts for such. Volcanos output is 1% of the world man-made emissions of carbon dioxide.

The bubble dome is your idea. But we are in a bubble dome. Its called the atmosphere.

As for my cars: one is a 20 year old car which averaged 45MPG & is still going. The spanky new car you mention is nearly 2 years old & AVERAGES 31.4MPG, 4.4 MPG OVER the EPA highway MPG. Its average MPG is almost twice the average of the corporate MPG of vehicles on the road in America, not quite a gas guzzler. Some people's reports on their Honda Fits do NOT get as good MPG as my car.

Oh, & the CVT is smooth & elegant! If the American Fit had had a CVT(like they have in other countries), I would have bought the Fit.

Last edited by litesong; 07-23-2008 at 05:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 04:06 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 2,272
Rep Power: 2868501
mahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to live
As for my cars: one is a 20 year old car which averaged 45MPG & is still going. The spanky new car you mention is nearly 2 years old & AVERAGES 31.4MPG, 4.4 MPG OVER the EPA highway MPG. Its average MPG is almost twice the average of the corporate MPG of vehicles on the road in America, not quite a gas guzzler. Some people's reports on their Honda Fits do NOT get as good MPG as my car.


I give up; whats the point? I too have a 32 mpg family sedan with CVT & a Fit daily runabout. (yes I want the Fit CVT too)
I wonder how much Al Gore will reduce his carbon footprint compared to what he wants us to do. until you show Al baby you're just another political doofus. Lead, follow, or get out of the way.
As far as carbon dioxide is concerned would you like to compare the CO2 exhaled by the human and animal population compared to vehicles? And if we didn't have CO2 the trees and plant life would die.
I'm all for a clean environment but not at the expense of quality living. (despite what he says Al agrees with me)
Reply With Quote
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 05:54 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 0
litesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahout View Post
As far as carbon dioxide is concerned would you like to compare the CO2 exhaled by the human and animal population compared to vehicles
As far as biological life on planet Earth, carbon dioxide emissions were in balance. Whatever carbon dioxide biological life ADDED to the atmosphere, biological life removed carbon dioxide. In the main, man made emissions via his machines are NOT being balanced.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 06:11 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 0
litesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahout View Post
I'm all for a clean environment but not at the expense of quality living. (despite what he says Al agrees with me)
I've never advocated anything except people increase their efficiency as technology leads, people should pick efficient technology, society should decrease waste & use the waste we create. In other words, people should emulate nature.
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 07:17 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 2,272
Rep Power: 2868501
mahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by litesong View Post
As far as biological life on planet Earth, carbon dioxide emissions were in balance. Whatever carbon dioxide biological life ADDED to the atmosphere, biological life removed carbon dioxide. In the main, man made emissions via his machines are NOT being balanced.
Population growing; plant life decreasing. Thats not balance.
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 07-23-2008, 08:49 PM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Monroe, Washington
Posts: 61
Rep Power: 0
litesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these partslitesong is infamous around these parts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mahout View Post
Population growing; plant life decreasing. Thats not balance.
Yes, why do you think I used the word 'were'. But the main contributor to out-of-wack emissions is NOT man's biological emissions, its man's mechanicals.
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 07-25-2008, 08:22 AM
Member
iTrader: (0)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 2,272
Rep Power: 2868501
mahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to livemahout relies on Rep Points to live
Quote:
Originally Posted by litesong View Post
Yes, why do you think I used the word 'were'. But the main contributor to out-of-wack emissions is NOT man's biological emissions, its man's mechanicals.
What do say about the scientist who developed the global warming model and got Nobel Prize for it now says the model says the earth is cooling ?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
07, e85, ethanol, fit, fuel, honda, prius, put, run, toyota

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
cancelled order for the Fit mav General Fit Talk 140 06-05-2006 10:05 AM
MT vs. AT--The RPM vs. MPG debate again cheffyjay General Fit Talk 17 05-05-2006 01:55 PM
Auto vs manual mileage debate Gordio General Fit Talk 36 04-19-2006 04:50 PM

 
Go


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0