1st Generation (GD 01-08) The one that started it all! Generation specific talk and questions here!

Edmunds Long-Term Test: 2007 Honda Fit Sport (Wrap-Up)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
BlackUp's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 348
From: You Ess and A
5 Year Member
Edmunds Long-Term Test: 2007 Honda Fit Sport (Wrap-Up)

Long-Term Test: 2007 Honda Fit Sport
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
TurboManGT's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,421
From: Twin Cities
$607 for front pads and turned rotors!!!!!
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #3  
polaski's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 548
From: USA
Whatever dealer they went to really screwed them over.

From majestic honda its $131.34 + shipping for new rotors and pads. That's cheaper than my EK was by $50 when I did them last. Heck MSRP for those parts is $187.63. Why then did they charge $400 in labor? It doesn't take 6-8 hours to do front brakes. I can do them in less than 2 EASY.

Transmission grenaded itself? Weird.

Yay for the SP31s lasting 27000 miles, thats good for dunlops
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 04:50 PM
  #4  
TurboManGT's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,421
From: Twin Cities
Hell I can do fronts in almost half an hour!!! $607 I don't believe it for a second
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #5  
somdamon's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 137
From: Boston, MA
My first test drive of a 2008 Sport Fit A/T Blackberry Pearl was not convincing for me to purchase. It was super cute and had a real sporty personality - but the A/T was frequently down shifting to maintain speed and felt cramped in the drivers seat. I am 5' 9" and couldn't quite find a good seat position to comfortably reach the steering wheel and pedals. I left the dealership empty handed...

A week later I decided to test drive a M/T for comparison - and because I really liked the car and wanted it to work for me. Much to my surprise - the 2008 Sport Milano Red M/T "FIT" perfectly! I am not sure why my comfort level was so much improved, but I didn't experience the "cramped" driving position I had with the A/T. The M/T also seemed to be a better match for the engine and I left with my new little buddy 3 hours later.

No regrets not waiting for an '09. I prefer the "boxy" look of the '08 and purposely shopped for that model year - and I think it's cute/sporty look is more to my liking. Who would have thought I would end up with a M/T though?

Motor on!
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 07:00 PM
  #6  
TurboManGT's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,421
From: Twin Cities
Good choice with the MT!!!
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #7  
BlackUp's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 348
From: You Ess and A
5 Year Member
I thought this was funny:

"When comparing the 2007 Nissan Versa to the 2007 Honda Fit, our preference was obvious. We struggled to reach 16,000 miles in our Versa, while the sportier Fit eclipsed 20,000 miles in the same time frame. The Versa didn't get much love."

2007 Nissan Versa SL Long-Term Wrap-Up
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 07:24 PM
  #8  
MINI-Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,105
From: Mililani, Hawaii
Originally Posted by TurboManGT
Good choice with the MT!!!
The MT is a much better car. Good choice.

Sorry to say in my area the dealerships get only 1 MT for every 9 AT so the Fits on the roads will reflect that limitation in supply.

Sometimes buyers will have to wait months for an MT and sometimes dealerships will sell out of ATs and have only one or two MTs left.

Since the demand from the general public is for ATs this trend is likely never to be changed. Dealerships claim they have no or little control about getting AT vs MT for the Fit.

I tried to get an MT for my Civic recently but was told that the dealership almost NEVER sees the Civic DX and manual transmission is only seen in the Civic Si since it only comes in MT. Same with Accords- all are AT.
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 07:52 PM
  #9  
somdamon's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 137
From: Boston, MA
Tooooo much manual fun!

[quote=MINI-Fit;441635]The MT is a much better car. Good choice.

quote]

I really am happy with the M/T. Easiest manual I have ever driven. Love the short shifts and clutch feel. Combined with the Fit handling - I feel it will be a true sports car when it grows up!
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 07:56 PM
  #10  
somdamon's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 137
From: Boston, MA
Say it isn't so!

Originally Posted by TurboManGT
Hell I can do fronts in almost half an hour!!! $607 I don't believe it for a second
$607?? What a nightmare - I would probably take to using my feet to brake and change my name to Fred........Flintstone that is!
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #11  
NEK FIT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 154
From: Northeast Kingdom of Vermont
Originally Posted by somdamon
My first test drive of a 2008 Sport Fit A/T Blackberry Pearl was not convincing for me to purchase. It was super cute and had a real sporty personality - but the A/T was frequently down shifting to maintain speed and felt cramped in the drivers seat. I am 5' 9" and couldn't quite find a good seat position to comfortably reach the steering wheel and pedals. I left the dealership empty handed...

A week later I decided to test drive a M/T for comparison - and because I really liked the car and wanted it to work for me. Much to my surprise - the 2008 Sport Milano Red M/T "FIT" perfectly! I am not sure why my comfort level was so much improved, but I didn't experience the "cramped" driving position I had with the A/T. The M/T also seemed to be a better match for the engine and I left with my new little buddy 3 hours later.

No regrets not waiting for an '09. I prefer the "boxy" look of the '08 and purposely shopped for that model year - and I think it's cute/sporty look is more to my liking. Who would have thought I would end up with a M/T though?

Motor on!
This somewhat parallels my experience. I'm about your size. I, too, have a MR '08 Sport manual. It's a great car. I also preferentially bought an '08 instead of an '09 because of the first gen's sportier/funkier look. I would never have considered an auto transmission, though -- 5-speed all the way, to get the full driving experience and achieve the best MPG (I'm averaging over 40 so far).

Aye, motor on and enjoy your Fit.
 
Old Sep 28, 2008 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
somdamon's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 137
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by NEK FIT
This somewhat parallels my experience. I'm about your size. I, too, have a MR '08 Sport manual. It's a great car. I also preferentially bought an '08 instead of an '09 because of the first gen's sportier/funkier look. I would never have considered an auto transmission, though -- 5-speed all the way, to get the full driving experience and achieve the best MPG (I'm averaging over 40 so far).

Aye, motor on and enjoy your Fit.
I am averaging 36 mpg combined and planning my first trip to Richmond, VA this December. A 10 hour drive and hoping the FIT will prove to be comfy enough for the trip. Looking forward to seeing highway mpg achieved.
 
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #13  
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,288
From: OG Club
5 Year Member
not sure why edmunds complains about the MT pedal location.
it's actually pretty good. the only thing lacking is the telescoping
steering wheel as noted in that article.

if you extend the steering column like me and get some real steering
wheels, it feels very much like a sports coupe in the cockpit.

if there was one thing i would complain about the MT, it is the rubber
pedal covers. the clutch pedal cover wears out so damn fast...
my 2nd one is already wearing out and im only 8.5k miles. the rubber
is too soft.



you can check out the DIY over in my Fit blog in the newbs section.
 
Old Sep 29, 2008 | 06:19 PM
  #14  
TurboManGT's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,421
From: Twin Cities
Originally Posted by MINI-Fit
The MT is a much better car. Good choice.

Sorry to say in my area the dealerships get only 1 MT for every 9 AT so the Fits on the roads will reflect that limitation in supply.

Sometimes buyers will have to wait months for an MT and sometimes dealerships will sell out of ATs and have only one or two MTs left.

Since the demand from the general public is for ATs this trend is likely never to be changed. Dealerships claim they have no or little control about getting AT vs MT for the Fit.

I tried to get an MT for my Civic recently but was told that the dealership almost NEVER sees the Civic DX and manual transmission is only seen in the Civic Si since it only comes in MT. Same with Accords- all are AT.
I know!!! When I went to buy my MT, the dealership told me they couldn't find one in the state of Michigan haha. Then a week later they found 3 of them.
 
Old Oct 5, 2008 | 08:33 PM
  #15  
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,288
From: OG Club
5 Year Member
yep, my dealer had like 5 MT's in-stock when i got my silver.
but they were out of AT's. im like 'so?'
 
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 12:53 AM
  #16  
Flyin172s's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 405
From: Syracuse, NY
5 Year Member
I can't believe they spent $886.62 on maintenance in 18 months. I've had mine for 13 months and put close to 18,000 miles on it and I've only spent $59.85. That's three visits to the dealer at $19.95 a pop. Granted I get free oil changes but...

The 10,000-mile service also included a full inspection and air filter replacement, bringing the grand total (including oil change) to $165.37.

...What dealer charges that much!? They got screwed.
 
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #17  
CorrodesTheFilm's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 161
From: Arkansas
5 Year Member
Also note something like $67 dollars for an air filter. I paid something like nine bucks for mine yesterday.
 
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 03:22 AM
  #18  
storm88000's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 588
From: Lehigh Valley, PA
Originally Posted by TurboManGT
Hell I can do fronts in almost half an hour!!! $607 I don't believe it for a second

Never under-estimate the stealership.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ernie Martin
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
0
Jul 18, 2018 03:21 PM
TaubBaer
3rd Generation (2015+)
13
Jun 1, 2017 12:11 PM
mtunofun
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
13
Aug 6, 2010 11:37 PM
kodo
Fit Suspension & Brake Modifications
5
May 27, 2008 02:08 AM
rm
Other Car Related Discussions
2
Aug 21, 2005 10:30 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:42 PM.