3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Manual Gear Ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 03:37 PM
  #41  
13fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,911
From: Ft.Hood TX // LaCrosse WI
91 or 93 isnt a premium fuel. its the same as 87, its simply made to have a longer burn.

99% of the time, the fuel quality is the same between 87 through 93 at the same station.

Very few gas stations have difference sources for their octane offerings.
 
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 03:58 PM
  #42  
Wanderer.'s Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,363
From: Hayward, CA
Semantics. Here in CA 91 is labeled "Premium" at every gas station in the state.

All that matters is the knock resistance/longer burn of 91 vs 87 and has nothing to do with fuel quality between the two grades.
 
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 04:43 PM
  #43  
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 238
From: Longview, TX
5 Year Member
Of course. That's why I'm looking at ignition timing, which is adjusted to avoid knock. I used the word premium because that's how the gas pump labels it.

 
Old Apr 15, 2014 | 06:50 PM
  #44  
13fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,911
From: Ft.Hood TX // LaCrosse WI
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
Of course. That's why I'm looking at ignition timing, which is adjusted to avoid knock. I used the word premium because that's how the gas pump labels it.


Yes, gas stations love to market higher octane as if its gold instead of bronze.


You have nothing to worry about as long as you use a gas station that stays busy. Those small town style gas stations dont always have the best quality, and tanks that dont get used up on a regular basis can become contaminated, moisture, or corrosion being the two biggest worries.
 
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 03:05 PM
  #45  
Ocedoc's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 28
From: Rochester, NY
5 Year Member
6Spd M/T Wider Ratio Range than 5 spd plus a goof

I originally was posting this as something funny because the guy doing the talking in this video is from Honda. He's in the passenger seat talking about the car. This section, he's talking about the CVT...at 2:15 he calls the Civic a Fisic... right?
2015 Honda Fit First Drive with Carl Pulley - YouTube

However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.

However, I'm not sure if we trust a person who calls one of his company's cars by the wrong name...
 
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 04:55 PM
  #46  
TCroly's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 427
From: Kihei, Maui, Hawaii
Originally Posted by Ocedoc
I originally was posting this as something funny because the guy doing the talking in this video is from Honda. He's in the passenger seat talking about the car. This section, he's talking about the CVT...at 2:15 he calls the Civic a Fisic... right?
2015 Honda Fit First Drive with Carl Pulley - YouTube

However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.

However, I'm not sure if we trust a person who calls one of his company's cars by the wrong name...
It is true, the 6 speed has a 5% wider gear range than the outgoing 5 speed, but that extra 5% is on the short side of the gearing. The 6 speed has a shorter first gear than the 5 speed.

What most were expecting was that we would get roughly the same first 5 gears and a taller 6th. But instead we got a shorter 1rst (better for fast acceleration from a standstill), a closer ratios through the gears, (better for making the most of engine power under full acceleration) and the same ratio for 6th as was 5th in the 5 speed.

The new 6 speed gear box should perform better in instrumented acceleration tests and around a race track or autocross course. Both things the car magazines gush their approval of. In Japan the engine and transmission we got is called the RS. So you can see what the goal was for this engine/transmission combination.
 

Last edited by TCroly; Apr 22, 2014 at 07:32 PM.
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 07:30 PM
  #47  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Ocedoc
However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.
Haha yeah thanks for playing.

BTW, we need not a 5% improvement, but something more drastic like 16% drop imho.

I suppose the Fit would look funny with 29" tall tires over 25" tall tires, which would achieve the same effect, but for all the gears.
 

Last edited by xorbe; Apr 22, 2014 at 07:34 PM.
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 12:15 AM
  #48  
mecevans's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 229
From: Monterey
Remember the EPA economy numbers are based on an average drive CYCLE.

Long distances with the cruise control the mpg's should go way beyond the EPA rating.
 
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 01:54 AM
  #49  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by mecevans
Remember the EPA economy numbers are based on an average drive CYCLE.

Long distances with the cruise control the mpg's should go way beyond the EPA rating.
The average speed for the highway cycle is only 45 or 48 mph though.
 
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 02:15 AM
  #50  
13fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,911
From: Ft.Hood TX // LaCrosse WI
Originally Posted by xorbe
The average speed for the highway cycle is only 45 or 48 mph though.
where was that information given?

I thought average highway speed was 55mph
 
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 09:21 AM
  #51  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by 13fit
where was that information given?

I thought average highway speed was 55mph
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

city 21.2, highway 48.3, "high speed" 48.4

In highway test, max acceleration is 3.2 mph/s which means 20.3 seconds to reach speed ...
 
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 11:07 AM
  #52  
mecevans's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 229
From: Monterey
"Beginning with 2008 models, three additional tests will be used to adjust the city and highway estimates to account for higher speeds, air conditioning use, and colder temperatures."

Up to 80mph! Like I said, not ideal long distance highway driving.
 

Last edited by mecevans; Apr 25, 2014 at 11:12 AM.
Old Apr 25, 2014 | 10:20 PM
  #53  
13fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,911
From: Ft.Hood TX // LaCrosse WI
Originally Posted by xorbe
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml

city 21.2, highway 48.3, "high speed" 48.4

In highway test, max acceleration is 3.2 mph/s which means 20.3 seconds to reach speed ...

that is on a specific 11.04 mile test. maximum speed of 56.7mph



I dont think that is a good basis for anything average.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rodney Balines Lopez
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
12
Oct 27, 2020 01:41 PM
Fitftw15
3rd Generation (2015+)
10
Sep 1, 2017 07:45 AM
appleb
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
24
Dec 24, 2012 09:22 AM
fit.sport
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
25
Feb 18, 2011 10:54 PM
fr_wilson
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
10
Apr 2, 2009 02:26 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 PM.