Manual Gear Ratios
#41
91 or 93 isnt a premium fuel. its the same as 87, its simply made to have a longer burn.
99% of the time, the fuel quality is the same between 87 through 93 at the same station.
Very few gas stations have difference sources for their octane offerings.
99% of the time, the fuel quality is the same between 87 through 93 at the same station.
Very few gas stations have difference sources for their octane offerings.
#42
Semantics. Here in CA 91 is labeled "Premium" at every gas station in the state.
All that matters is the knock resistance/longer burn of 91 vs 87 and has nothing to do with fuel quality between the two grades.
All that matters is the knock resistance/longer burn of 91 vs 87 and has nothing to do with fuel quality between the two grades.
#44
Yes, gas stations love to market higher octane as if its gold instead of bronze.
You have nothing to worry about as long as you use a gas station that stays busy. Those small town style gas stations dont always have the best quality, and tanks that dont get used up on a regular basis can become contaminated, moisture, or corrosion being the two biggest worries.
#45
6Spd M/T Wider Ratio Range than 5 spd plus a goof
I originally was posting this as something funny because the guy doing the talking in this video is from Honda. He's in the passenger seat talking about the car. This section, he's talking about the CVT...at 2:15 he calls the Civic a Fisic... right?
2015 Honda Fit First Drive with Carl Pulley - YouTube
However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.
However, I'm not sure if we trust a person who calls one of his company's cars by the wrong name...
2015 Honda Fit First Drive with Carl Pulley - YouTube
However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.
However, I'm not sure if we trust a person who calls one of his company's cars by the wrong name...
#46
I originally was posting this as something funny because the guy doing the talking in this video is from Honda. He's in the passenger seat talking about the car. This section, he's talking about the CVT...at 2:15 he calls the Civic a Fisic... right?
2015 Honda Fit First Drive with Carl Pulley - YouTube
However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.
However, I'm not sure if we trust a person who calls one of his company's cars by the wrong name...
2015 Honda Fit First Drive with Carl Pulley - YouTube
However... he also goes on to say that the 6spd M/T has a 5% wider range ratio range than the previous 5 spd M/T (See 3:25ish) Which seems to contradict the concerns of 6th gear having the same ratio as the 2013 5th gear.
However, I'm not sure if we trust a person who calls one of his company's cars by the wrong name...
What most were expecting was that we would get roughly the same first 5 gears and a taller 6th. But instead we got a shorter 1rst (better for fast acceleration from a standstill), a closer ratios through the gears, (better for making the most of engine power under full acceleration) and the same ratio for 6th as was 5th in the 5 speed.
The new 6 speed gear box should perform better in instrumented acceleration tests and around a race track or autocross course. Both things the car magazines gush their approval of. In Japan the engine and transmission we got is called the RS. So you can see what the goal was for this engine/transmission combination.
Last edited by TCroly; 04-22-2014 at 07:32 PM.
#47
BTW, we need not a 5% improvement, but something more drastic like 16% drop imho.
I suppose the Fit would look funny with 29" tall tires over 25" tall tires, which would achieve the same effect, but for all the gears.
Last edited by xorbe; 04-22-2014 at 07:34 PM.
#51
city 21.2, highway 48.3, "high speed" 48.4
In highway test, max acceleration is 3.2 mph/s which means 20.3 seconds to reach speed ...
#52
"Beginning with 2008 models, three additional tests will be used to adjust the city and highway estimates to account for higher speeds, air conditioning use, and colder temperatures."
Up to 80mph! Like I said, not ideal long distance highway driving.
Up to 80mph! Like I said, not ideal long distance highway driving.
Last edited by mecevans; 04-25-2014 at 11:12 AM.
#53
https://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/fe_test_schedules.shtml
city 21.2, highway 48.3, "high speed" 48.4
In highway test, max acceleration is 3.2 mph/s which means 20.3 seconds to reach speed ...
city 21.2, highway 48.3, "high speed" 48.4
In highway test, max acceleration is 3.2 mph/s which means 20.3 seconds to reach speed ...
that is on a specific 11.04 mile test. maximum speed of 56.7mph
I dont think that is a good basis for anything average.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rodney Balines Lopez
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
12
10-27-2020 01:41 PM
Fitftw15
3rd Generation (2015+)
10
09-01-2017 07:45 AM