Should I buy a TPMS sensor when replacing donut on 2015 LX?
Should I buy a TPMS sensor when replacing donut on 2015 LX?
For 2015 LX CVT I am replacing the donut with a full size spare. I understand many cars can't handle a 5th TPMS sensor. Perhaps Honda's can't either.
OH. I didn't know there was a system like that. So I guess all I need is a regular valve stem installed and the tire & wheel balanced?
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=44
Unfortunately, indirect tire pressure monitoring systems have several shortcomings. Indirect systems won't tell the drivers which tire is low on pressure, and won't warn the driver if all four tires are losing pressure at the same rate (as occurs during the fall and winter months when ambient temperatures get colder). Additionally, our current experience with indirect systems indicates that they can generate frequent false warnings. We have found that false warnings may occur when the tires spin on wet, icy and snow-covered roads. In these cases, the false alarms would train the driver to disregard the tire pressure monitoring system's warnings, negating its purpose completely.
Originally Posted by TireRack
Unfortunately, indirect tire pressure monitoring systems have several shortcomings. Indirect systems won't tell the drivers which tire is low on pressure, and won't warn the driver if all four tires are losing pressure at the same rate (as occurs during the fall and winter months when ambient temperatures get colder). Additionally, our current experience with indirect systems indicates that they can generate frequent false warnings. We have found that false warnings may occur when the tires spin on wet, icy and snow-covered roads. In these cases, the false alarms would train the driver to disregard the tire pressure monitoring system's warnings, negating its purpose completely.
Considering that the tire industry brought TPMS upon us (via the Firestone/Ford Bronco lawsuit and the do-gooder legislation that followed) it really galls me to see them profiting from it. At least sensorless systems let us reset things ourselves.
Last edited by GeorgeL; Oct 30, 2014 at 07:00 PM.
dunno about that. When I have a tire get low on air pressure, nice to know exactly which tire, and exactly how low it is. Also nice to be able to check all four tire pressures. There are also very rarely any false positives, and the batteries last much longer than a set of tires (or two, or three, or four). I've never had a faulty tire sensor before, and it's not like it's that hard to replace. Most systems I've used allow you to recalibrate the sensors very easily (I tried on a coworkers Honda Odyssey... apparently you have to take it in to Honda to do it?)
Compare that to my now-ignored TPMS light in the fit that comes on two or three times a week, and its a much better system. More expensive too. I would say the statement that "most new cars come with this system" is false, most economy cars come with the system because they are too cheap to implement a system that actually works. When the feds mandated all new cars have to have it, well a lot of companies took the cheap and ineffective way out (rather than focus on the whole point, consumer safety and fuel mileage).
Compare that to my now-ignored TPMS light in the fit that comes on two or three times a week, and its a much better system. More expensive too. I would say the statement that "most new cars come with this system" is false, most economy cars come with the system because they are too cheap to implement a system that actually works. When the feds mandated all new cars have to have it, well a lot of companies took the cheap and ineffective way out (rather than focus on the whole point, consumer safety and fuel mileage).
Last edited by Bigbadvoodooguru; Oct 30, 2014 at 07:03 PM.
I personally despise the nanny-state mentality that assumes we are all too useless, stupid, and/or ignorant to execute such a simple element of vehicular maintenance without legally-mandated monitoring.
Honda have blessed us with a system that satisfies the nannies without adding needless complexity, weight, and systems to the car. In my mind this is by far the lesser of two evils. Thank you Honda.
While I agree a tire gauge should still be used, and I do use one on a regular basis (I have to, because I check tire pressure 2-3 times a week when the light comes on in my Fit. Wouldn't want it to ACTUALLY be low when the light turns on!), newer technology like in-wheel TPMS is progress. I'm of the opinion that even if it works, it should still be improved. This is the natural progression of improvement, from physical resistance gauges, to digital tire gauges, to rotational-delta systems, to in-wheel systems, to who knows what's next. What I don't appreciate is intrusive technology that doesn't work correctly. Examples would be the TPMS system in the Fit. It serves absolutely no purpose for a light to turn on when none of the tires are low, 2-3 times a week. Another would be a missing volume knob on the radio. While I am all for change, it should be functional, tested change that doesn't force a user to accommodate it.
In my case, I wish they made the car self-calibrating when you turn the vehicle on, like every other car I've had with TPMS. But then again, that only works because its actually measuring tire pressure. As far complexity and weight, a TPMS system is not going to add much to this already overly complex car (and if it wasn't an overly complex car, I wouldn't have bought it. The tech stuff was pretty much the only appealing thing to me when I bought it).
In my case, I wish they made the car self-calibrating when you turn the vehicle on, like every other car I've had with TPMS. But then again, that only works because its actually measuring tire pressure. As far complexity and weight, a TPMS system is not going to add much to this already overly complex car (and if it wasn't an overly complex car, I wouldn't have bought it. The tech stuff was pretty much the only appealing thing to me when I bought it).
Most of the vehicles I drive, due to their age, have no TPMS at all. Am I nervous when driving them? Of course not! I check the pressures every month or so and any problem that would cause pressures to decrease in the interim will cause the tire to look noticeably different. Most sensor-based systems only go off if pressure drops markedly which is no better than simply looking at the tire.
Would it be nice to have a system that shows exact pressures for each tire? Sure, but that isn't a very common level of accuracy. The systems now in use simply warn if pressure drops a significant percentage below the requirement. If your pressure is specified to be 35PSI, the system, direct or indirect, won't warn you until a tire is in the mid-20s.
Even Tire Rack, a huge proponent of profitable direct sensors, admits:
Given that these systems are simply a result of a bureaucratic need to "Do Something" I prefer the simplest and least invasive system possible, one that allows people to have winter and summer wheels without additional expense, and one that allows drivers to use non-conventional tires and pressures if desired.
Would it be nice to have a system that shows exact pressures for each tire? Sure, but that isn't a very common level of accuracy. The systems now in use simply warn if pressure drops a significant percentage below the requirement. If your pressure is specified to be 35PSI, the system, direct or indirect, won't warn you until a tire is in the mid-20s.
Even Tire Rack, a huge proponent of profitable direct sensors, admits:
Originally Posted by TireRack
we are concerned that the drivers of vehicles equipped with any tire pressure monitoring system will become over confident in the capabilities of their system and will be even less likely to confirm their vehicle's cold tire pressure with a pressure gauge at least once a month
Would it be nice to have a system that shows exact pressures for each tire? Sure, but that isn't a very common level of accuracy. The systems now in use simply warn if pressure drops a significant percentage below the requirement. If your pressure is specified to be 35PSI, the system, direct or indirect, won't warn you until a tire is in the mid-20s.
Good to know next time when I buy new tires I will opt out the TPMS rebuild kit. Had to do that with my previous cars (2012 Civic Hybrid and 2009 CRV).
My 2012 Impala would give me the tire pressure for each wheel. Just used system check for this. My 2012 Ford Mustang would not give individual tire pressure readings.
I just filled Honda tires to 36 PSI per tire gauge and never had tpms light come on.
I just filled Honda tires to 36 PSI per tire gauge and never had tpms light come on.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




