3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Should I buy a TPMS sensor when replacing donut on 2015 LX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 05:13 PM
  #1  
Namae Kana's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 106
From: West Coast
Should I buy a TPMS sensor when replacing donut on 2015 LX?

For 2015 LX CVT I am replacing the donut with a full size spare. I understand many cars can't handle a 5th TPMS sensor. Perhaps Honda's can't either.
 
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 05:25 PM
  #2  
15BlkPrl's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 321
From: Md
You do realize the car does not use in wheel tpms sensors......
 
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 06:52 PM
  #3  
Namae Kana's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 106
From: West Coast
Originally Posted by 15BlkPrl
You do realize the car does not use in wheel tpms sensors......
OH. I didn't know there was a system like that. So I guess all I need is a regular valve stem installed and the tire & wheel balanced?
 
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 06:57 PM
  #4  
kenji815's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 293
From: Walnut, CA
all new car uses abs sensor for TPMS you don't need a sensor in the valve stem
 
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 07:12 PM
  #5  
Lane03's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147
From: Florida
5 Year Member
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tiretech/techpage.jsp?techid=44

Unfortunately, indirect tire pressure monitoring systems have several shortcomings. Indirect systems won't tell the drivers which tire is low on pressure, and won't warn the driver if all four tires are losing pressure at the same rate (as occurs during the fall and winter months when ambient temperatures get colder). Additionally, our current experience with indirect systems indicates that they can generate frequent false warnings. We have found that false warnings may occur when the tires spin on wet, icy and snow-covered roads. In these cases, the false alarms would train the driver to disregard the tire pressure monitoring system's warnings, negating its purpose completely.
 
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 04:40 PM
  #6  
Apexracing's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 119
From: camillus, ny
Beats expensive sensors that have to be replaced every 2-3 years.
 
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 06:58 PM
  #7  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
Originally Posted by TireRack
Unfortunately, indirect tire pressure monitoring systems have several shortcomings. Indirect systems won't tell the drivers which tire is low on pressure, and won't warn the driver if all four tires are losing pressure at the same rate (as occurs during the fall and winter months when ambient temperatures get colder). Additionally, our current experience with indirect systems indicates that they can generate frequent false warnings. We have found that false warnings may occur when the tires spin on wet, icy and snow-covered roads. In these cases, the false alarms would train the driver to disregard the tire pressure monitoring system's warnings, negating its purpose completely.
And this is little different from the problems with systems featuring in-wheel sensors! They are hardly accurate or reliable either, the only difference is that fixing glitches with them requires buying new sensors which may or may not fix the problem. Remember that Tire Rack (and the entire tire industry) also makes money by selling sensors, so they will naturally bad-mouth any alternative.

Considering that the tire industry brought TPMS upon us (via the Firestone/Ford Bronco lawsuit and the do-gooder legislation that followed) it really galls me to see them profiting from it. At least sensorless systems let us reset things ourselves.
 

Last edited by GeorgeL; Oct 30, 2014 at 07:00 PM.
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 07:00 PM
  #8  
Bigbadvoodooguru's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 227
From: Los Angeles
dunno about that. When I have a tire get low on air pressure, nice to know exactly which tire, and exactly how low it is. Also nice to be able to check all four tire pressures. There are also very rarely any false positives, and the batteries last much longer than a set of tires (or two, or three, or four). I've never had a faulty tire sensor before, and it's not like it's that hard to replace. Most systems I've used allow you to recalibrate the sensors very easily (I tried on a coworkers Honda Odyssey... apparently you have to take it in to Honda to do it?)

Compare that to my now-ignored TPMS light in the fit that comes on two or three times a week, and its a much better system. More expensive too. I would say the statement that "most new cars come with this system" is false, most economy cars come with the system because they are too cheap to implement a system that actually works. When the feds mandated all new cars have to have it, well a lot of companies took the cheap and ineffective way out (rather than focus on the whole point, consumer safety and fuel mileage).
 

Last edited by Bigbadvoodooguru; Oct 30, 2014 at 07:03 PM.
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 08:29 PM
  #9  
NotBlake's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 178
From: GA
Originally Posted by Bigbadvoodooguru
dunno about that. When I have a tire get low on air pressure, nice to know exactly which tire, and exactly how low it is. Also nice to be able to check all four tire pressures.
There is and has been a system that lets you do just this for decades. It's called a tire pressure gauge and should STILL be used by motorists on a regular basis to ensure proper tire inflation.

I personally despise the nanny-state mentality that assumes we are all too useless, stupid, and/or ignorant to execute such a simple element of vehicular maintenance without legally-mandated monitoring.

Honda have blessed us with a system that satisfies the nannies without adding needless complexity, weight, and systems to the car. In my mind this is by far the lesser of two evils. Thank you Honda.
 
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 08:56 PM
  #10  
Bigbadvoodooguru's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 227
From: Los Angeles
While I agree a tire gauge should still be used, and I do use one on a regular basis (I have to, because I check tire pressure 2-3 times a week when the light comes on in my Fit. Wouldn't want it to ACTUALLY be low when the light turns on!), newer technology like in-wheel TPMS is progress. I'm of the opinion that even if it works, it should still be improved. This is the natural progression of improvement, from physical resistance gauges, to digital tire gauges, to rotational-delta systems, to in-wheel systems, to who knows what's next. What I don't appreciate is intrusive technology that doesn't work correctly. Examples would be the TPMS system in the Fit. It serves absolutely no purpose for a light to turn on when none of the tires are low, 2-3 times a week. Another would be a missing volume knob on the radio. While I am all for change, it should be functional, tested change that doesn't force a user to accommodate it.

In my case, I wish they made the car self-calibrating when you turn the vehicle on, like every other car I've had with TPMS. But then again, that only works because its actually measuring tire pressure. As far complexity and weight, a TPMS system is not going to add much to this already overly complex car (and if it wasn't an overly complex car, I wouldn't have bought it. The tech stuff was pretty much the only appealing thing to me when I bought it).
 
Old Nov 1, 2014 | 06:03 PM
  #11  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
Most of the vehicles I drive, due to their age, have no TPMS at all. Am I nervous when driving them? Of course not! I check the pressures every month or so and any problem that would cause pressures to decrease in the interim will cause the tire to look noticeably different. Most sensor-based systems only go off if pressure drops markedly which is no better than simply looking at the tire.

Would it be nice to have a system that shows exact pressures for each tire? Sure, but that isn't a very common level of accuracy. The systems now in use simply warn if pressure drops a significant percentage below the requirement. If your pressure is specified to be 35PSI, the system, direct or indirect, won't warn you until a tire is in the mid-20s.

Even Tire Rack, a huge proponent of profitable direct sensors, admits:

Originally Posted by TireRack
we are concerned that the drivers of vehicles equipped with any tire pressure monitoring system will become over confident in the capabilities of their system and will be even less likely to confirm their vehicle's cold tire pressure with a pressure gauge at least once a month
Given that these systems are simply a result of a bureaucratic need to "Do Something" I prefer the simplest and least invasive system possible, one that allows people to have winter and summer wheels without additional expense, and one that allows drivers to use non-conventional tires and pressures if desired.
 
Old Nov 2, 2014 | 01:42 AM
  #12  
DrewE's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,199
From: Vermont, USA
Originally Posted by GeorgeL
Would it be nice to have a system that shows exact pressures for each tire? Sure, but that isn't a very common level of accuracy. The systems now in use simply warn if pressure drops a significant percentage below the requirement. If your pressure is specified to be 35PSI, the system, direct or indirect, won't warn you until a tire is in the mid-20s.
I don't know how commonly it's done, but it's certainly not unknown for vehicles to indeed show the actual pressure in each of the tires by tire location, or at the least indicate which tire is low when one is low. (Nissan, at least, also has a nifty feature on some cars where the car can let you know when you've reached the proper pressure as you air up the low tires by flashing the flashers and beeping the horn.)
 
Old Nov 3, 2014 | 12:04 AM
  #13  
DArkk's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 342
From: Modesto, CA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by kenji815
all new car uses abs sensor for TPMS you don't need a sensor in the valve stem
Good to know next time when I buy new tires I will opt out the TPMS rebuild kit. Had to do that with my previous cars (2012 Civic Hybrid and 2009 CRV).
 
Old Dec 31, 2014 | 12:27 PM
  #14  
BILLBOGEY's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 144
From: st louis
My 2012 Impala would give me the tire pressure for each wheel. Just used system check for this. My 2012 Ford Mustang would not give individual tire pressure readings.
I just filled Honda tires to 36 PSI per tire gauge and never had tpms light come on.
 
Old Jan 2, 2015 | 01:25 AM
  #15  
Gorilla's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 52
From: USA
Many cars have in-tire TPMS that do not provide individual readings. Those are the worst since you pay a lot of $ when changing tires and yet get no benefit at all.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AuctionHugh
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
7
May 31, 2021 02:25 AM
nbartlet
1st Generation (GD 01-08)
17
Aug 1, 2017 12:33 AM
Santiad
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
15
Feb 23, 2012 02:02 AM
Vacca Rabite
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
4
Mar 25, 2011 11:35 AM
Itsslow
Fit Wheels & Tires
16
Dec 3, 2010 09:31 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 AM.