Car Shows, Events, and Racing Announcements, discussions, news reports, and pictures for Car Shows, Race Events, Media Events, and Group Drive Events. Please post Event Location in the Thread Title since this is an International Forum!

Temple Dragway with the Fit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #41  
Ricepuddin's Avatar
Father of the Wasteland
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 561
From: Ft. Hood Texas
he means CAI lol
 
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 03:38 AM
  #42  
Paulo107's Avatar
June 2007 1st Place Fit of the Month Winner
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,664
From: The Latin Pot
Originally Posted by having a fit
those are some bad
times for real when the car is supposed to run 16.8 fully stock with the average driver
even if an average driver runs a 1/4 mile they will not pull off a 16.8...C&D has drivers that do that for a living (TEST DRIVERS)...you have to know what RPM to launch from, pressure in tires, YADA, YADA ,YADA...it was his first time @ the track and not everyone has the experience like we do...you learn as you go...i went to my first AutoX and my last 4 runs i was timed...my first run to my last run i improved my runs by 5 seconds...i was quick to learn the course and where i was going slow at...if i ran more i KNOW i would have gone faster...i want to go to the dragstrip and see what the Fit runs with me behind the wheel...personally i think the Fit is more at home at the track than 1/4...but i will try to get out to the strip.
my point to all this is give pointers to those that have done it the 1st time instead of dissing them...pay attention that it was his 1st time
 
Old Apr 7, 2007 | 02:02 AM
  #43  
redfit_pr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 281
From: puerto rico
i was the one that run 16.6 and my 60 foot was 2.2
 
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 01:18 PM
  #44  
redfit_pr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 281
From: puerto rico
and this last wednesday i run 16.3 @ 81.9 mph

click here to see details...

ImageShack - Hosting :: scangu0.jpg
 
Old Apr 14, 2007 | 02:43 PM
  #45  
fit_4_a_king's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 140
From: CA
Originally Posted by Mx6GT89
I dont really think he needs a slip. If the EF CRX can run 16.5 stock back in 89 I dont see why the Fit cant. Similar power and weight. New and better designed motors. Its all driver. Which is why I asked for 60 foots. 60's make the 1/4 mile times.

If hes getting 2.5's 2.4's in the 60's then thats why hes running 17's. If he's getting 2.1's and what not he cant driver after the 60's. (bad shifting)
A 1989 CRX Si is barely over 2000lbs (something like 2038lbs IIRC) with 108hp and 100tq. The Fit is over 400lbs more. And I'm pretty sure that an 89 was running closer to 16.2 stock, but I have to pull out my old Car&Driver magazine to verify that.

After at least 20 runs down the strip, my best is 16.9@79mph, completely stock, with a best 60ft of 2.5xx. If I could pull a 2.4 or 2.3 (highly unlikely) that would translate to a possible 16.5 (very highly unlikely) stock. Maybe with intake/header/exhaust it would be possible.


With IHE and a cam in my 89 CRX Si I was able to pull multiple 14s runs with a best of 14.82@93mph (edit: 2.2xx 60ft)- I hope the Fit can be just as responsive to bolt-ons. Even at over 350,000 miles, it still hits 15.3@91, and gets close to 40mpg and the untouched bottom end still doesn't burn oil between oil changes.
 

Last edited by fit_4_a_king; Apr 14, 2007 at 02:50 PM. Reason: added 60ft for CRX
Old Apr 16, 2007 | 05:17 PM
  #46  
George02's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,878
From: Rosamond, CA
I ran a 17.6 on 87oct. full tank of gas and NO vtec on the car. car is stock. I had problems with my controller so had to unplug vtec from the ecu, but will have vtec on this week. might got to the track to see a better time. I'm sure i'll click off a 16sec pass?
 
Old May 24, 2007 | 02:12 AM
  #47  
redfit_pr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 281
From: puerto rico
today i run 16.22 @ 83mph wohhooo
 
Old Jun 1, 2007 | 11:01 AM
  #48  
sLiVeRwOrM's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Four Wheels Enthusiast
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,460
From: Austin TX, USA
I do wanna go back, but have not had much time to do that..
 
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 01:19 PM
  #49  
YeeFit's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,110
From: Calgary, Canada
Hey guys... take this into consideration as well when looking at 1/4 mile times ppl post.

I live in Calgary Alberta Canada and the elevation here is higher than most cities in North America. When I ran my 2000 B16A Civic Si at the local track the fastest time I could post in stock config was a 16.8, after gutting the interior and adding I/H/E I was able to bring that number down to 16.0.

I was shocked to see these numbers out of a 160hp Si.. but when I spoke to local racers they said that your times in Calgary will be about a second slower than US posted times due to the elevation difference. So my times were almost right on par with the tests posted in magazines of mid to low 15s.

Just cause someone can run faster than you or faster than the mags take this factor into consideration.. as well as track temp and air temp as well as those make huge differences too.
 

Last edited by YeeFit; Jun 18, 2007 at 01:22 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tonyd3773
Other Car Related Discussions
7
Apr 27, 2008 01:45 PM
tonyd3773
Other Car Related Discussions
4
Mar 24, 2008 08:04 PM
tonyd3773
Other Car Related Discussions
0
Mar 12, 2008 04:56 PM
tonyd3773
Other Car Related Discussions
1
Feb 28, 2008 09:05 PM
Gordio
Other Car Related Discussions
20
Jan 15, 2008 11:17 AM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:45 AM.