General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Same fit, same engine, different mpg

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #21  
GoFit's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
From: Philippines
There's 2 different 1.5 L engines fitted in the JAZZ/FIT, read it in a review but can't remember specifics.

I'll do a search and will be back w/ more info (i hope).
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 10:27 PM
  #22  
GoFit's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
From: Philippines
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #23  
_karu_'s Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 65
From: NY, USA
u guys are not comparing NA Fit with Jazz i-DSI, right? it's totally different.

i-DSi is very slow and has a lot better MPG.

Also think about the emmision devices we have in NA Fit?
 
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 11:12 PM
  #24  
GoFit's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
From: Philippines
It's a comparison i'm trying to make to ease confusion on mpg's.

1.5L v-tec vs. 1.5L i-Dsi

Anyway, anyone who hasn't read it should.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 05:02 AM
  #25  
peterc10's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 60
From: Kent, England
Originally Posted by Blazer Deli
The car companies are in on this fun little game too.

Hard to imagine 100 years since the model T and there hasn't been a "significant" efficiency improvement. Granted the Model T didn't have AC, power steering, power brakes.

Please don't tell me that the civic hybrid and prius are significant improvement that warranted 100 years to invent.
I am not old enough to remember the Model T Ford, but I am old enough to remember cars in the 1960s and 70s. Not sure what it was like in the US but over here cars have improved hugely by any measure you like to choose since then.

Value for money, efficiency (48 imperial mpg for a car pushing out 75hp and capable of doing 100mph), reliability, comfort, acceleration, speed, safety, and security have all improved, and not just by a bit. Of those for most ordinary users (not motoring journalists) the most important is reliability. That is what allowed Japanese car firms to take such a large market share around the world. Reading your posts it seems the American car makers are learning the same hard lessons our European ones did.

IMHO the next step change in transport, if that is what you are after, will not involve cars as we know them , and certainly not the internal combustion engine.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #26  
Blazer Deli's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 123
From: Madison, AL
Efficiency has not been a focus of innovation over the past 100 years.

I think the foreign makers have a leg up on the domestics, but I still think they are all late to the party.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #27  
peterc10's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 60
From: Kent, England
The drive for efficiency has been about for many years in Europe. We do not have the same history of "gas guzzlers" as the US. Over here petrol (gas) has always been much more expensive than in the US, mainly because it is the target of indirect taxation by most of our governments. With the latest price hikes we are paying the equivalent of about $6 for a US gallon of petrol!!

Therefore we have always had a much greater emphasis on economy, with generally much smaller cars with smaller engines and many more diesel engines in cars. My guess is that that trend will continue (I don't see oil getting much cheaper do you) here and will also become more important in the USA.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 10:27 AM
  #28  
Blazer Deli's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 123
From: Madison, AL
Good point Peter. I will be happy when they start bringing some of the nice diesels you have across the pond.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #29  
ieldib's Avatar
New Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 17
From: Pinellas Park, FL USA
Originally Posted by oldspark
I drove mine home frome the dealer (80 miles) and the gauge did not move much at all, less than a quarter tank and that was at 60 mph most of the time with a little bit at 65 and some at 58 or so.
I have not done any highway driving yet.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 11:30 AM
  #30  
peterc10's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 60
From: Kent, England
Originally Posted by Blazer Deli
Good point Peter. I will be happy when they start bringing some of the nice diesels you have across the pond.
I have the VAG V6 2.5L turbo diesel in my Skoda Superb (same as in the Audi A6) with Tiptronic gearbox - a very smooth unit producing 160bhp and if I am light footed I can get over 40mpg on long runs. Where diesel engines really score over similar sized petrol engines is in the torque figures - which gives lots of mid range acceleration

But my wife's new Jazz with the 1.4 petrol engine is very impressive too - shows what can be done to reduce fuel use - just a shame Honda put the thirstier 1.5 engine in the North American version.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #31  
ieldib's Avatar
New Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 17
From: Pinellas Park, FL USA
Originally Posted by Blazer Deli
Good point Peter. I will be happy when they start bringing some of the nice diesels you have across the pond.
I agree, I would love to own a ford fiesta, or a vw lupo tdi.
 
Old Apr 28, 2006 | 05:30 PM
  #32  
vividjazz's Avatar
Someone that Posts too much
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 683
From: Sydney, Australia
Lies, lies and damn statistics. Out in the real world just drive it, enjoy it and enjoy the excellent real world milage which has no bearing on any BS test lab.

As for the difference between the gutless NON-VTEC 1.3L sold as 1.4L in some markets and the VTEC 1.5L. 24nm torque less, 20kw less for 0.3L/100km fuel saving. If your going to be that much of a miser get a push bike or walk and get 0L/100km - in fact the bike has more chance of getting up a decent hill faster. You don't get a choice in some markets like Europe where the vastly superior VTEC Jazz/Fit is not offered and their vehicles are made in lowest cost mainland China.
 

Last edited by vividjazz; Apr 28, 2006 at 05:36 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
watermantra
General Fit Talk
1
Jun 22, 2009 10:12 PM
crst4s
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
5
Mar 18, 2009 08:15 PM
fANTOM
General Fit Talk
9
Jul 2, 2008 12:25 AM
Giggles
General Fit Talk
14
May 15, 2008 06:31 PM
knutcrai
Fit Freak Newbie / FAQs
2
Jul 7, 2006 04:01 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:47 PM.