2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Any MPG reports yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:02 PM
  #181  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Originally Posted by CrystalFiveMT
What would my 42 mpg calculated translate to?

For Canadian L/100 km to US MPG, it is 235.2/(L/100 km).

For US MPG to Canadian L/100 km it is 235.2/US MPG. So your 42 MPG = 5.6 L/100 km.... holy cow! That's good. Crap, guess I really do need to get my speed down to 55 mph max and revs below 2000. Not easy...
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:09 PM
  #182  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Also note that our reported fuel mileage ratings here in Canada are:

City = 7.1 L/100 km = 33 US MPG
Highway = 5.5 L/100 km = 43 US MPG

The EPA states the ratings for the '09 AT as:

City = 28 US MPG = 8.4 L/100 km
Highway = 35 US MPG = 6.7 L/100 km
Combined = 31 US MPG = 7.6 L/100 km

So it would appear, from input on this thread, that the Canadian ratings are much more accurate than the EPA ones....interesting.
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #183  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Originally Posted by FitCanada_Girl
For Canadian L/100 km to US MPG, it is 235.2/(L/100 km).

For US MPG to Canadian L/100 km it is 235.2/US MPG. So your 42 MPG = 5.6 L/100 km.... holy cow! That's good. Crap, guess I really do need to get my speed down to 55 mph max and revs below 2000. Not easy...
No, think about it...Why 55 mph? Because that was our speed limit in the 70s and 80s? If 55 mph, why not 50? 45? The slower you go in top gear, the less friction and fuel usage.

I think I was actually getting higher than 42 mpg, because 1/2 tank later with my weekly work commute it still ended up at 41.1. I was averaging 70 mph when getting the "42" mpg.

It's also good to rev the engine. That's what it's made for.

If it makes you feel any better I average around 34-35 here in LA.
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #184  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Originally Posted by cranky18
Here's a conversion website that may help.

Miles per gallon converter

Hmm...try this one: Unit Conversions
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #185  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Originally Posted by CrystalFiveMT
No, think about it...Why 55 mph? Because that was our speed limit in the 70s and 80s? If 55 mph, why not 50? 45? The slower you go in top gear, the less friction and fuel usage.

I think I was actually getting higher than 42 mpg, because 1/2 tank later with my weekly work commute it still ended up at 41.1. I was averaging 70 mph when getting the "42" mpg.

It's also good to rev the engine. That's what it's made for.

If it makes you feel any better I average around 34-35 here in LA.

I'll feel better when I can get warm air out of my vents on my ENTIRE commute, not just when going over 80 km/hr. Oh I'm ok with my average 36 MPG but reading that some people are getting over 40 MPG has me a bit envious....
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #186  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Originally Posted by FitCanada_Girl
I'll feel better when I can get warm air out of my vents on my ENTIRE commute, not just when going over 80 km/hr. Oh I'm ok with my average 36 MPG but reading that some people are getting over 40 MPG has me a bit envious....
I'll have to try out my heater on full. I turn the dial for some heat while I'm using the A/C, and I know it works, even though I feel the A/C cycling on and off.

Do you think the techs inadvertently messed up your thermostat while installing your remote start?
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #187  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Can't be sure since I've only recently been noticing the cold air blowing, despite heat being to MAX and fan to 1 (and engine completely warmed up). Looks more and more like a coolant issue from input here.

Needless to say, those of you who get cold winters should check this NOW! I'll post an update thread on my heating system issue either tomorrow or Wednesday....


Originally Posted by CrystalFiveMT
I'll have to try out my heater on full. I turn the dial for some heat while I'm using the A/C, and I know it works, even though I feel the A/C cycling on and off.

Do you think the techs inadvertently messed up your thermostat while installing your remote start?
 
Old Nov 3, 2008 | 01:28 PM
  #188  
djf36's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 4
From: Tucson, Az
Just got back from a 180 mile loop trip to Nogales in my 3 day old Fit SA. What a pleasant first trip. Filled up on return at the same Costco pump and used 4.6! 39 mpg. Used the cruise control on the freeway at 65-75 mpg (about 60-40 freeway-rural)

Very pleased with this car after 200 miles!

Sorry, I made a mistake. The correct mpg was 31. I'm still happy for the first tank.
 

Last edited by djf36; Nov 4, 2008 at 11:05 AM. Reason: Error in calculation
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #189  
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,929
From: Palm Coast FLA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by FitCanada_Girl
WOW! 43.5 MPG??? What is your car's specs (ok it's a SSM 2009 but is it MT or AT)? Sorry, I'm too lazy to look through this whole thread. Now off to figure out what 55 miles/hour translates to in km/hour....88.5 km/hour. Well traffic moves awfully fast around here so I've been setting my cruise at 95 km/hour on the "highway" (= 59 miles/hour) and 75 km/hour city (= 47miles/hour), where possible/safe of course! I try to keep my RPM below 3000. Guess 2000 would be more fuel efficient but I haven't been able to attain that and NOT get run off the road. Drivers around here are a TAD aggressive...


my car is auto
don't forget drive like you have no brakes
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 11:18 AM
  #190  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Originally Posted by niko3257
my car is auto
don't forget drive like you have no brakes
Hmmm....dare I ask? I did a bit of reading over on the Eco forum and on cleanmpg then got scared and ran off! Freaky stuff those hard core "hypermilers" are doing...freaky! So no brakes hey? Well since we both have an '09 AT, I guess 43.5 MPG is a realistic goal for me....no brakes hey?
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 12:15 PM
  #191  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Originally Posted by FitCanada_Girl
Hmmm....dare I ask? I did a bit of reading over on the Eco forum and on cleanmpg then got scared and ran off! Freaky stuff those hard core "hypermilers" are doing...freaky! So no brakes hey? Well since we both have an '09 AT, I guess 43.5 MPG is a realistic goal for me....no brakes hey?
Which is very difficult to do here in LA. Still, I get 36/37 on the BSM just in city driving.
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 12:20 PM
  #192  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
Ok, I was checking the Eco forum and cleanmpg again (can't help it!) and I'm not even sure about accelerating/RPM ranges now! Say getting going from a stop in a 60 km/hr zone (37 mph from here: Unit Conversions) with an automatic, what RPM should I be aiming for, max, to maximize my fuel efficiency? I thought slow (2000 RPM max) but read somewhere that medium speed is best to get up to cruising range... I just have to stop reading those threads! See, I would have been happy with 36 MPG but now that someone got 43.5 MPG with an auto....
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #193  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Originally Posted by FitCanada_Girl
Ok, I was checking the Eco forum and cleanmpg again (can't help it!) and I'm not even sure about accelerating/RPM ranges now! Say getting going from a stop in a 60 km/hr zone (37 mph from here: Unit Conversions) with an automatic, what RPM should I be aiming for, max, to maximize my fuel efficiency? I thought slow (2000 RPM max) but read somewhere that medium speed is best to get up to cruising range... I just have to stop reading those threads! See, I would have been happy with 36 MPG but now that someone got 43.5 MPG with an auto....
It depends on if you're on an incline too, but theoretically, the slower you accelerate, the less gas you use, as long as you don't spend much time at high rpm in each gear. OTOH, if you accelerated to 37 mph aggressively and then coasted in neutral, your FE wouldn't be far off from your slow start.

You want to be in the highest gear as possible, all the time, but only if you don't have an upcoming hill. Just think of a 10 or 12 speed bike as an analogy. For the easiest acceleration, you would start in the lowest gear and climb through each gear but slowly. OTOH, if you're biking up a hill and upshift to a higher gear and then gun it, you'll be using a lot of energy. Same applies to cars.

If you really want to recoup your mileage, you may want to mimic what I do with a manual and shift it to neutral whenever you can, especially on declines...I get huge FE doing this. Sometimes, I'll be coasting for miles. Like going to Vegas there was this constant decline for about 6 miles, and I was coasting in neutral doing 85 mph when I started at 65 or 70. Huge fuel savings there.

Hope this helps.

As a side note, as my reward for achieving great mileage last week, I refueled this past Sunday and switched the FE meter to the odometer and this week I'm eschewing a lot of my FE mode and revving the engine, dipping into the throttle a lot more...holy cow, this thing is fun! It revs and sounds lovely, reminiscent of my Acura RSX-S, and the power delivery is smooth and constant up to redline. Sooooooo lovin this car! And, as I've pointed out in an earlier post, my engine has loosened up quite a bit and is revving freer with more torque. In short, this thang is fun!

Happy Fitting!
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 01:15 PM
  #194  
FitCanada_Girl's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 935
From: Sudbury, ON, CANADA
I'd be happier if I were "Puffer-Fitting"! What a pain in the &$*# hey? Have to leave shortly to get my car's heating system repaired anyways so it's all yours .....
 
Old Nov 4, 2008 | 01:19 PM
  #195  
CrystalFiveMT's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,662
From: New York State
Good luck!!
 
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 12:07 AM
  #196  
spin out's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 516
From: new jersey
5 Year Member
2nd tank:
computer said 35.9 mpg (+3.7)
hand calculated: 32.2 mpg.

3rd tank:
computer said 37.5 mpg (+4.0)
hand calculated: 33.5 mpg.

mixed driving.
my daily roundtrip to work is 28 miles.

16 traffic lights one way.
32 traffic lights roundtrip.
at least half are red.
 

Last edited by spin out; Nov 12, 2008 at 12:38 PM.
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 12:43 AM
  #197  
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,929
From: Palm Coast FLA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by FitCanada_Girl
Hmmm....dare I ask? I did a bit of reading over on the Eco forum and on cleanmpg then got scared and ran off! Freaky stuff those hard core "hypermilers" are doing...freaky! So no brakes hey? Well since we both have an '09 AT, I guess 43.5 MPG is a realistic goal for me....no brakes hey?

not completely. hey
i use them. i just try to look ahead and see whats coming.
this way i can determine if i stay on the gas or get off and coast.


also on a side note. i filled up yesterday. for this tank i decided to drive
fast. meaning accelerate fast and drive up to 65 mph.
amazingly i got 38.4 mpg. i was surprized. the BSM said 42.6 lol
 
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #198  
iiyama's Avatar
New Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 10
From: Archer, Fl
Mileage report

Mileage Report__2009 Sport Auto With Navi.


Tank No. _______________ Fifth tank
Fuel ___________________87 oct. BP (same pump)
Where _________________North Central Florida
Terrain _________________Flat, more or less
Elevation _______________100ft +/-
Tire Pressure ____________44lb cold
Ambient Temperature _____ Day-80/90 deg. +, Night 65/75 deg.
Driving Style ____________Conservative
Passengers/cargo__________(Driver-150lb + passengers/cargo) 600lb Average
Usage __________________City-20%, Hwy. 80%(90% rural; 45-60, 10% Above 60)
A.C. ___________________35% use
Transmission ____________100% in (D), no use of (S) at this time
Total Mileage ____________1645 miles
Miles this tank ____________231.1 miles
Gallons used _____________6.930
M.P.G. By calculation ______33.350
M.P.G. Shown on Dash ( BSM )_____40.9 !!! ( it's not learning )


Most of this tank was used hauling high school kids to and from events. (5 or 6, and for one trip 7) The extra weight results in about a 3mpg hit.


(I realize this report is somewhat verbose but all data shown is relative for comparative purposes)



Mileage Report__2009 Sport Auto With Navi.


Tank No. _______________ Six
Fuel ___________________87 oct. BP
Where _________________Trip to SW Florida
Terrain _________________Flat, more or less
Elevation _______________100ft +/- to 10ft
Tire Pressure ____________44lb cold
Ambient Temperature _____ Day-80/90 deg. +, Night 65/75 deg.
Driving Style ____________Conservative
Passengers/cargo__________(4 adults, a 35 lb. Dog, and some luggage. About 650 lb.)
Usage __________________100% Hwy. ( I-75, 70 mph average)
A.C. ___________________65% use
Transmission ____________100% in (D), no use of (S) at this time
Total Mileage ____________1968 miles
Miles this tank ____________323.4 miles
Gallons used _____________8.846
M.P.G. By calculation ______36.56
M.P.G. Shown on Dash ( BSM )_____42.4 !!! ( it's not learning )


(I realize this report is somewhat verbose but all data shown is relative for comparative purposes)



Mileage Report__2009 Sport Auto With Navi.


Tank No. _______________ Seven
Fuel ___________________87 oct. generic
Where _________________North Central Florida
Terrain _________________Flat, more or less
Elevation _______________100ft +/-
Tire Pressure ____________44lb cold
Ambient Temperature _____ Day-80/90 deg., Night 60/70 deg.
Driving Style ____________Conservative
Passengers/cargo__________(Driver-150lb + passengers/cargo) 300lb Average
Usage __________________City-20%, Hwy. 80%(60% rural; 45-60, 40% Above 60)
A.C. ___________________35% use
Transmission ____________100% in (D), no use of (S) at this time
Total Mileage ____________2304 miles
Miles this tank ____________335.3 miles
Gallons used _____________8.894
M.P.G. By calculation ______37.7
M.P.G. Shown on Dash (BSM)_____40.9


Best mileage so far.


I realize this report is somewhat verbose but all data shown is relative for comparative purposes
 
Old Nov 6, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #199  
09 Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 212
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Learning? The computer does learn your driving habits for oil changes but I don't believe it learns anything for your MPG. In order for it to learn that information you would have to "tell it" how many gallons you actually put into the tank.
 
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #200  
zakurie's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 94
From: Bay Area
1st Tank of Gas
307.2 miles
9.68 gallons
31.7 MPG
35.2 BSM

This was from 60% highway driving, and driving up some steep hills!
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:41 AM.