Any MPG reports yet?
as for the mileage read here
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/gene...extension.html
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/fit-...e-mileage.html
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/gene...extension.html
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/fit-...e-mileage.html
as for topping the gas tank off. yes it's not recommended
but it's been done. to do it twice is not going to hurt
the car.
read here for more info.
Fit gas tank info topped off - CleanMPG Forums
also read here
Scan Gauge II accuracy on Fits - CleanMPG Forums
but it's been done. to do it twice is not going to hurt
the car.
read here for more info.
Fit gas tank info topped off - CleanMPG Forums
also read here
Scan Gauge II accuracy on Fits - CleanMPG Forums

previously....
Last edited by p nut; Dec 7, 2008 at 12:51 PM.
Someone that spends HER life on FitFreak.net
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,963
From: Houston TX
The amount you put in is told to you by the gas pump. You have to trust the gas pump in any case - you can't do anything about a small variance anyway.
Forcing gas into your tank is doing nothing except making it very likely that you will ruin something in your engine.
Good to hear that somebody ACTUALLY have done some tests. However, I pose the same question to you. How do you know that the Scangauge is more correct than the BSM?
I am not saying one is more correct than the other, but I am just trying to playing devil's advocate to try and figure out which method is actually correct. The manual calc. COULD be more correct. The BSM/SGII COULD be more correct. So far, I have not come to any solid conclusions yet.
My Acura MDX has an option to manually calibrate the odometer (through the NAV). Not sure if this is the case with the Fit's.
I am not saying one is more correct than the other, but I am just trying to playing devil's advocate to try and figure out which method is actually correct. The manual calc. COULD be more correct. The BSM/SGII COULD be more correct. So far, I have not come to any solid conclusions yet.
My Acura MDX has an option to manually calibrate the odometer (through the NAV). Not sure if this is the case with the Fit's.
How one prove the BSM is more accurate? Travel a certain distance and fine out how much actual fuel used?

The manual method is the most accurate. How simple can it get? Miles traveled used divided by fuel used=MPG. It's best to use the same pump every time.
When there is a 10%. Something is not right.
Last edited by Ein; Dec 7, 2008 at 03:48 PM.
How one prove the BSM is more accurate? Travel a certain distance and fine out how much actual fuel used? 
The manual method is the most accurate. How simple can it get? Miles traveled used divided by fuel used=MPG. It's best to use the same pump every time.
When there is a 10%. Something is not right.

The manual method is the most accurate. How simple can it get? Miles traveled used divided by fuel used=MPG. It's best to use the same pump every time.
When there is a 10%. Something is not right.
I'm seeing a declining trend in my mileage over time in my 09 base AT. I thought the initial difference after the first fill up might have been due to the dealer using pure gasoline, or a better quality one than I've been using, but the reslts from using gas at two stations shouldn't be this big. The first tank was 37.3, the second dropped to 35, then 33, 32 and now 26 mpg.
I've had my fit for just over a week now and here's the result from my first fill-up.
Calculated: 35.9 mpg
Trip computer: 38.8 mpg
This is with 60/40 % freeway/city driving. A good portion of which includes stop-n-go on the freeway. I expect the average to drop to about 33 mpg once it's broken in and I start playing with the paddle-shifters
Calculated: 35.9 mpg
Trip computer: 38.8 mpg
This is with 60/40 % freeway/city driving. A good portion of which includes stop-n-go on the freeway. I expect the average to drop to about 33 mpg once it's broken in and I start playing with the paddle-shifters
I'm seeing a declining trend in my mileage over time in my 09 base AT. I thought the initial difference after the first fill up might have been due to the dealer using pure gasoline, or a better quality one than I've been using, but the reslts from using gas at two stations shouldn't be this big. The first tank was 37.3, the second dropped to 35, then 33, 32 and now 26 mpg.
32 is still good if your driving is mostly city. If that's your highway mileage I would be very concerned.
So far I have gone through 4 tanks of gas with 80% Highway 20% Surface streets driving and have the following MPG
Tank1 46 trip computer/ 42 calculated
Tank2 45 trip computer/ 42 calculated
Tank3 42 trip computer/ 40 calculated
Tank4 43 trip computer/ 40 calculated
Tank1 46 trip computer/ 42 calculated
Tank2 45 trip computer/ 42 calculated
Tank3 42 trip computer/ 40 calculated
Tank4 43 trip computer/ 40 calculated
Is yours an m/t or a/t? Is your gas E-10 (ethanol blend)? These are very important details.

Keep in mind that not all pumps auto shut off at the exact same place so sometimes your tank may get a little more or less. Averaging these fill ups is important.
hmm...
You are correct. California began using ethanol in 2003 with the ban of MTBE.
Most gas stations sell about 6% ethanol.
Someone that spends HER life on FitFreak.net
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,963
From: Houston TX
I still love my car, but I'd be even happier if I could get 30 in the city.
JDM
How are you driving to get numbers like that?
How are you driving to get numbers like that?
is this why i dont get mileage average over 30?



