I guess everyone here is waiting for me to post. lol
I'm at work, so I don't have the new vid and the pictures.
The original run 3 weeks ago was odd and also read stupid torque numbers, so apparently those numbers weren't all too accurate (as I also stated in my other thread that I didn't believe those numbers to be too accurate anyways.)
We did quite a few runs this past weekend and the baselines were pretty consistant. Leo, I think you screwed up, because the base was around 98hp, not 90hp. I think the 90hp was when you guys were still tuning it and it was dipping. Also, we peaked out at 110hp not 107hp. The intake so far sounds really good. I'm currently running the short ram and I'll take some pix of it also. You can feel a huge difference after 3000rpms in normal driving. I'm still on the same tank of gas from before and still am at about 35mpg calculated (even after 20+ dyno runs!). I'm gonna be filling up tonight, so I'll let you guys also know how it affects the gas mileage.

 

Totally got the numbers all messed up.. so many numbers and dyno runs..
Finally got it all squared away with Alpha One..

Very sorry for the MIX up guys.. Not trying to pull the wool over anyones eyes..

Here is the STOCK vs. The 2.5" MAF Sensor Section. The ECU totally Didnt like it..



Here is the STOCK vs. WR Cold Air..

 

This seems like more realistic numbers....

 

suscribed...i wanna follow this.

 

I'll make sure to post up the vid of the runs. I think I have a couple.
BTW, I am not affiliated with them at all in any way.
So I have nothing to gain from making false claims.

 

except a free intake(noise maker) LOL

 

Now admit it, I was right all along. All those years I spenty on a dyno taught me well :P

Thanks bro for getting it right dude and as said to you b4. Let me know how it goes. Are you still having ANY AT ALL ISSUES with the sensor thorwing ANY codes at random or any soft of bogging anywhere in the rpm band?

Ken

 

So far I haven't noticed anything. It's been pretty good. It was storming over the weekend, so I was pretty light on the throttle. It's nice and sunny now, so I'm going to step on it a bit before filling up. I can def feel more "umph" than before once it gets around 3000rpm.
Car is still slow tho... lol Coming from a nicely modded RSX and s2 don't help. lol

 

soooo which 1 is the right one? 12 hp gain on NA just intake with out tune is huge!!...

but isnt dynapack read on hub? not the wheels?



is this the 1? or is there any long intake arm? from WR

 

The intake is not even out yet...
I dont even have a picture of it yet, and i work there..

Yes the 12hp gain is correct.. Alpha will have videos up tonight..
And yes dynapack hooks up to the hubs and not the wheels/tires..
Which means what? Means that its more accurate than dynojet or mustang..

If you think 12hp on a Fit is too huge of a gain..
The does the K&N banner that rotates on this forum and many hundreds of forums a CROCK of ISH also..?
2006-09 CORVETTE 27HP Gain / 2007-08 Shelby Mustang 53HP Gain.. Suddenly 12hp doesnt sound out of reach for a super effecient engine that has vtec..

 

But that is the thing. It is all a crock of ish.... It has been proven time and time again on the forum that intakes(for the fit) are putting out 3-5 tops and it is usually lower. Like I have said before and will say again how do you expect anyone to believe this when a supercharger is only claiming a very small amount more than what your claiming for just an intake.

 

Dood just wait for the video... Because its the truth..
Believe it or not..

 

Don't compare intakes for vettes and stangs. Its a completely different application. You have a 6.2L V8 gaining 28whp. I can see that. The Fit is a 1.5L 4cyl, to make 12whp is a miracle, the engine in a Fit compared to a V8 vette is more than 4x smaller..

Dynapacks are not more accurate by any means. And the Kraftwerks SC made the increase on a dynojet. If you take 10whp gain on a dynojet and put the same car on a Dynapack you'll get a silly number like 20hp increase.

Someone once said to me that every 4lbs you can take off of rotational mass is equivalent to 1whp. So, if we take the stock wheels of a Fit which is probably ~35lbs? then you can take 9whp off the total. Not sure if this is true, but I would guess that if you took the WR intake and put the same car on a dynojet you'd see about 4-5whp gain.


If I took my car and put it on a Dynapack, I'd see about 200hp at the flywheel. I made 170whp on a Dynojet. There's the difference.

I think the best thing to do to prove it to all the nay sayers here is to put it to the test on a dynojet, those are the numbers ppl are used to seeing on this forum... and if they are as good as they seem then good 4 you guys for breaking the max intake hp increase number for any honda out there!

 

I think as long as you have the baseline to compare using the same system and calibration you should get usable results.

 

Like i said.. Let him show the videos..

 

just be glad something is in the development people!!!

 

Fo shizzle...

 

i like cookies...

 

Ill wait for an independant party's dyno results...

Every manufacturer claims theyre intake or exhaust make insane amounts of horsepower.

 

What a cowinky dink. ME TOO!!!