Swift Sport Springs Review thread (pics)
Getting old is a bitch
oh, btw... jim2bfit... there's a slight problem with the picture of the strut parts and red lines. the two lines should be pointing at part #12 and #20. parts #13, #14, #19 and #18 all sit on top of #12 (bearing), which is held down by #20... a nut that goes on the same threads that part #18 goes onto.
there is no bearing in #14... only #12 is the bearing... the inner shaft of the damper doesn't rotate when the car turns. It's stationary relative to the car. the part #12 allows everything below it to rotate. And to do that, no part of #12 actually rests on the shaft. the lower half rests on part #10 (being pushed into it by the spring), the upper half pushes into part #13. It is initially held down by the the part #20 (nut), but once you put the car on the ground, part #13 puts more force onto the bearing.
ultimately, what we want is part #12 and #18 to tighten against each other (with everything in between).
there is no bearing in #14... only #12 is the bearing... the inner shaft of the damper doesn't rotate when the car turns. It's stationary relative to the car. the part #12 allows everything below it to rotate. And to do that, no part of #12 actually rests on the shaft. the lower half rests on part #10 (being pushed into it by the spring), the upper half pushes into part #13. It is initially held down by the the part #20 (nut), but once you put the car on the ground, part #13 puts more force onto the bearing.
ultimately, what we want is part #12 and #18 to tighten against each other (with everything in between).
Some people are going to be WTF about this, but I understand what you mean. I don't want a car that looks lowered, but is low. Like the way, a BMW 3 series is, which has about as much fender gap in the rear as a slammed Fit - stock, but it also trims out the space around the tire nice and evenly.
edit: Illustration
Last edited by hayden; Jan 31, 2011 at 04:10 PM.
In tuner terms, this is called "filling out the wheel wells" (even space around the tire) and the Swifts do a pretty good job, or as close as you are probably going to get. You might try going down to a 45 profile tire to get some of the uniformity back. For whatever reason, aftermarket wheels lessen this effect, probably because the added width take away some of the "overhang" look that you are referring to.
Some people are going to be WTF about this, but I understand what you mean. I don't want a car that looks lowered, but is low. Like the way, a BMW 3 series is, which has about as much fender gap in the rear as a slammed Fit - stock, but it also trims out the space around the tire nice and evenly.
edit: Illustration

Some people are going to be WTF about this, but I understand what you mean. I don't want a car that looks lowered, but is low. Like the way, a BMW 3 series is, which has about as much fender gap in the rear as a slammed Fit - stock, but it also trims out the space around the tire nice and evenly.
edit: Illustration

Wow, my Swifts are going on next week, and I was worried about this exact same thing. I hope it doesn't bother me too much. Maybe I'm weird, but I've always really liked the stock stance of the Fit (especially with lines of the Mugen package). I'm going to the Swifts for the performance more than to change the stance.
In tuner terms, this is called "filling out the wheel wells" (even space around the tire) and the Swifts do a pretty good job, or as close as you are probably going to get. You might try going down to a 45 profile tire to get some of the uniformity back. For whatever reason, aftermarket wheels lessen this effect, probably because the added width take away some of the "overhang" look that you are referring to.
Some people are going to be WTF about this, but I understand what you mean. I don't want a car that looks lowered, but is low. Like the way, a BMW 3 series is, which has about as much fender gap in the rear as a slammed Fit - stock, but it also trims out the space around the tire nice and evenly.
edit: Illustration

Some people are going to be WTF about this, but I understand what you mean. I don't want a car that looks lowered, but is low. Like the way, a BMW 3 series is, which has about as much fender gap in the rear as a slammed Fit - stock, but it also trims out the space around the tire nice and evenly.
edit: Illustration

Wow, my Swifts are going on next week, and I was worried about this exact same thing. I hope it doesn't bother me too much. Maybe I'm weird, but I've always really liked the stock stance of the Fit (especially with lines of the Mugen package). I'm going to the Swifts for the performance more than to change the stance.
the illustration looks like someone with mismatched eyes!
The forward rake is even more pronounced on the GD models and removing the rear seats make it all the more noticeable.... I had put some 16"X7" wheels with 38mm offset and 195 X 45 16" tires on my car for a while and they did look better than my 15"X7" 41 mm RPF1's with 195-55-15 tires... The exaggerated offset, weight and low aspect ratio of the tires made the torque steer, braking force increase, acceleration loss and loss of ride quality very noticeable.... The filled up wheel well,"flush" look thing isn't worth what is sacrificed in comfort, handling and performance that is given up to be stylish.
You're talking about a lot more than I am.
My "beef" is with just the look of the wheel well when you look directly at the face of the wheels, not the along the side view you would need to notice offset (aka, flush). Although it was an idea I talked about in an older thread (about possibly added a spacer, but I changed my mind about it).
There is no amount of wheel or tire changing that will solve what I'm talking about. It has only to do with the center of the wheel vs the center of the arch or the wheel well. The problem with Hayden's illustration is that he didn't match the size of the well, making it appear that I'm talking about changing the size of the tires. Bigger tires will FILL the wheel well, closing the gap in front and rear of the tire, but it will also close the gap at the top of the tire even more... keeping it out of proportion while I'm currently lowered with the Swifts.
A better example... when you jack up the car, watch how the look changes as the height of the car changes (while the tire stays on the ground).
Like I said, there are only two solutions... move the height of the car back to stock, or re-cut the wheel well's arch.
I do like the handling of the Swift springs alot... and since I don't want the hassle of cutting up the car (nor could i afford it)... I'll just stick with it as it is now.
I really like the RPF1 Type IIs. They're kinda light weight, have a much closer offset to stock (+45) and I kinda like the style of it... but holy crap, they're expensive.
My "beef" is with just the look of the wheel well when you look directly at the face of the wheels, not the along the side view you would need to notice offset (aka, flush). Although it was an idea I talked about in an older thread (about possibly added a spacer, but I changed my mind about it).
There is no amount of wheel or tire changing that will solve what I'm talking about. It has only to do with the center of the wheel vs the center of the arch or the wheel well. The problem with Hayden's illustration is that he didn't match the size of the well, making it appear that I'm talking about changing the size of the tires. Bigger tires will FILL the wheel well, closing the gap in front and rear of the tire, but it will also close the gap at the top of the tire even more... keeping it out of proportion while I'm currently lowered with the Swifts.
A better example... when you jack up the car, watch how the look changes as the height of the car changes (while the tire stays on the ground).
Like I said, there are only two solutions... move the height of the car back to stock, or re-cut the wheel well's arch.
I do like the handling of the Swift springs alot... and since I don't want the hassle of cutting up the car (nor could i afford it)... I'll just stick with it as it is now.
I really like the RPF1 Type IIs. They're kinda light weight, have a much closer offset to stock (+45) and I kinda like the style of it... but holy crap, they're expensive.
I know what you are talking about... It is the short length of the control arms from the torsion beam to then stub axles the rear wheels attach to..... The wheel swings in an arc instead of moving vertically up and down.
no no... still too complicated.
I'm talking just the simple look.
for example, at the currently lowered height with the swifts, you have say, 4 inches from the edge of the tire, to the front and rear of the well. then about 3 inches to the top (out of proportion). in stock, it's 4 inches in front, rear and top (proportion).
As you jack up the car, the top spacing gets even bigger.
that's all i'm talking about.
I'm talking just the simple look.
for example, at the currently lowered height with the swifts, you have say, 4 inches from the edge of the tire, to the front and rear of the well. then about 3 inches to the top (out of proportion). in stock, it's 4 inches in front, rear and top (proportion).
As you jack up the car, the top spacing gets even bigger.
that's all i'm talking about.
Yeah the wheels swing in an arc like on the swing arm on the rear end of a motor cycle except the arms between the pivoting torsion beam are shorter so if they are not perfectly horizontal as when stationary the wheelbase length decreases when the torsion beam is higher or lower than the hight of the center of the wheel... Around a sharp corner when the beam is flexed the difference in wheelbase from one side to the other will be different, or when only one side hits a bump the same thin occurs .... The old VW Beetles did the same thing because the used a transversely mounted torsion bar instead of springs and the pre 68 models with swing axles had varying caster, camber, tow in and wheelbase changes on turns and over bumps.... Now that was complicated.
Goob!!! Stop being so anal and enjoy the look and ride of your car on Swifts. 
I am hoping today to get a call my snowblower is repaired and I can pick it up in the Fit before the storm comes. I doubt if I will see my wheel wells tomorrow. Anyways they are full of ice and snow.

I am hoping today to get a call my snowblower is repaired and I can pick it up in the Fit before the storm comes. I doubt if I will see my wheel wells tomorrow. Anyways they are full of ice and snow.
We will be having icy conditions here in a few hours.... This weather covering such a large area is supposed to be the largest winter storm situation in weather forecasting history.... It might be kind of fun to get out and drive in... I'm glad the old lady has a Subaru.
We will be having icy conditions here in a few hours.... This weather covering such a large area is supposed to be the largest winter storm situation in weather forecasting history.... It might be kind of fun to get out and drive in... I'm glad the old lady has a Subaru.
Oh man...
if I wasn't plowing the snow with my car, I will be soon!
And I have to do deliveries on the next set of snow fall... should be fun!
oh, Black3sr... it's hard to enjoy the car, when you're stuck in the house and not out driving! No one to hang out with yesterday.
if I wasn't plowing the snow with my car, I will be soon!
And I have to do deliveries on the next set of snow fall... should be fun!
oh, Black3sr... it's hard to enjoy the car, when you're stuck in the house and not out driving! No one to hang out with yesterday.
You fellows up north have to deal with winter driving conditions that get pretty wild an challenging...I have had to drive and work outside in the white stuff on ice covered everything and enjoyed it a lot until I'd step off a curb to walk around to the drivers side door of my truck, slip, fall and bust my ass... How often do you guys fracture your tail bones????



