General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Did you buy the fit for good mpgs?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 04:49 PM
  #41  
pb and h's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 604
From: Lexington, SC
If you get the Skunk2 short shifter then the "shaft" will not be shorter, it will actually sit 1/4-1/2 inch higher but the shifting difference is shorter. I even put on the 5spd Aluminum shift knob too...........ooooooo
 

Last edited by pb and h; Dec 12, 2007 at 04:53 PM.
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #42  
Mr B's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 214
From: Arcadia, CA
I never touched the 350Z shifter as it's pretty nice already... just a little notchy in some gears. Fixed easily by my warrantied transmission and redline fluids.
I have the H-Fit on the Fit and it's pretty good. Shortened the throws and didn't make it notchier either so I'm happy.
 
Old Dec 12, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #43  
BrianT's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 216
From: Western North Carolina
the MPG was the a big reason. but it looks cool and it was what i needed when i was shopping for a car. one thing lead to another and i got car
 
Old Dec 13, 2007 | 04:27 PM
  #44  
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20,288
From: OG Club
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by pb and h
If you get the Skunk2 short shifter then the "shaft" will not be shorter, it will actually sit 1/4-1/2 inch higher but the shifting difference is shorter. I even put on the 5spd Aluminum shift knob too...........ooooooo
hummm... ok, that might be worth a try then. thanks for the info.
 
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 02:45 AM
  #45  
gts1985's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 28
From: sf, cali
well... initially got the FIT because both of my CRX were putting up crazy mileages. i do about 100 miles a day. soooo... i obviously needed to get a car that was reliable. had the car for almost a week now. like the feel... but still not used to the "new" car feel. just wondering though... how the jdm version claims it gets 48 mpg on the hwy and the usdm ver. only gets 38 mpg hwy? besides the 200 pounds of weight difference and the 185 tires to the 195/55/15. is there something that the japanese version has or less restriction than the usdm version that it gets way better mpg on the hwy? i'm on the hwy like 90% of the time with the FIT. thx.
 
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 03:31 AM
  #46  
KayJai's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 42
From: Japan
JDM claims are due to the 1.3L
I have one,... it's gutless but good god, great gas mileage!
Still handles the same, just gotta keep the speed up around corners
 
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 03:52 AM
  #47  
gts1985's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 28
From: sf, cali
ic. i was going with the specs that i see on fitfreak.net HOME page. it list both the jdm and the usdm as 1.5 vtec sport. hmm... typos??? would truly love to get 48mpg on the hwy. :P
 
Old Dec 27, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #48  
coupdetat's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 349
From: Avon, CT
MPG was a big factor, I wouldn't settle for anything under 30mpg. I got my MT Fit (1.5) last week and my first tank of all suburban/city driving was 30.7mpg. Not bad, especially considering I have very little experience driving a manual!! My old Solara V6 3.0 automatic could only do 18-20mpg in the same conditions.


Looks, utility, and uniqueness were other factors. I've yet to see another BOM Fit on the road anywhere.
 

Last edited by coupdetat; Dec 27, 2007 at 03:17 PM.
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 03:12 AM
  #49  
shudderbug's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 146
From: California
Originally Posted by coupdetat
MPG was a big factor, I wouldn't settle for anything under 30mpg. I got my MT Fit (1.5) last week and my first tank of all suburban/city driving was 30.7mpg. Not bad, especially considering I have very little experience driving a manual!! My old Solara V6 3.0 automatic could only do 18-20mpg in the same conditions.


Looks, utility, and uniqueness were other factors. I've yet to see another BOM Fit on the road anywhere.
Congratulations on your new Fit! Your mileage should improve as you get more experience with the manual. After 6,200 miles on my M/T, I'm averaging 36+ MPG on mostly suburban-/city driving, same as you. Just remember to: avoid jack rabbit starts (unless necessary), and whenever possible, anticipate the traffic ahead so you can avoid complete stops at red lights. With a little luck (in traffic) you'll see that mileage go way up.
Happy Fit driving
 
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 11:04 AM
  #50  
ImPuLsIvE.ca's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 139
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Why yes, I did buy the Fit because it seemed to be cheap on gas. I just went through my first tank 2 days ago and only got ~400 KM's from it

However, it was cheap to fill up. Hopefully the A/C defrost mod will help.
 
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 11:44 AM
  #51  
coupdetat's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 349
From: Avon, CT
It has a small tank, you can't really change that. I only got around 270 miles from my first tank, too.
 
Old Dec 28, 2007 | 03:22 PM
  #52  
GeorgeC's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 101
From: Vancouver, BC
no

i just like the Fit
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
glocker17
General Fit Talk
27
Oct 30, 2012 04:00 PM
Fitcious
Other Car Related Discussions
8
Mar 10, 2010 11:08 PM
Mr. TruSpeed
General Fit Talk
10
Apr 2, 2008 02:14 AM
Jlimer78
Other Car Related Discussions
5
Jul 28, 2006 11:45 AM
JazzFusion
General Fit Talk
19
Mar 8, 2006 10:29 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:03 PM.