3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

LX vs EX - The undocumented differences

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
Lane03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147
From: Florida
5 Year Member
LX vs EX - The undocumented differences

After reading about some of the differences between these two models that are not listed on the Honda specifications, I thought it would be good to report them all in one thread. As there are also differences from market to market, this thread will only focus on the USDM. Please post any other differences (not listed on the Honda website) here to help other users.

LX has black trim on the front and rear vs the chrome on the EX
LX has different cloth material and design than the EX
LX does not have rear wheel fender liners like the EX
LX has unique underbody panels to obtain higher MPG than the EX (Perhaps not: https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/3rd-...er-panels.html)
 

Last edited by Lane03; Oct 27, 2014 at 11:04 AM.
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 11:40 AM
  #2  
LxFit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 27
From: Tricities
Lx is clearly the better car.
Don't know why people have not figured this out, I would like factory paddle shifters, factory fender liners, Weathertech floor liners, and aftermarket touchscreen.
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
Lane03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147
From: Florida
5 Year Member
^ You might not want the fender liners after reading the thread I linked to.
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 01:45 PM
  #4  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
I think that the fender liners are for sound reduction. No other reason to omit them on the LX.
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 01:49 PM
  #5  
sooznd's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,453
From: Colorado
5 Year Member
I don't have a GK -the only reason I would choose an EX is for the sunroof-- I prefer the black to the chrome in front & rear. Would someone post a photo of the differences in the steering wheel/dash/radio? Also is the interior material a different color?
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 02:52 PM
  #6  
stembridge's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 927
From: The Middle West
5 Year Member
I'm quite interested in putting the underbody panels on my EX… need to look into part numbers, etc.

es
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 03:07 PM
  #7  
miroman86's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 43
From: Los Angeles
No AUX input on EX models... stupid move.
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 10:09 PM
  #8  
LxFit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 27
From: Tricities
My Lx Fit seat material looks like a freshly made suit, while the ex cloth looks childish...
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 10:22 PM
  #9  
cheesewhiz's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 254
From: Massachusetts
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by miroman86
No AUX input on EX models... stupid move.
EX has ?two? USB ports and an HDMI .... LX has one USB and one AUX input, no HDMI.

Does EX/EX-L have better "cloth/carpet" in the cargo area?
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 10:46 PM
  #10  
LxFit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 27
From: Tricities
cheap carpet in LX fit.
premium molded carpet kit needs to be made!
 
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 11:52 PM
  #11  
kenji815's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 293
From: Walnut, CA
why would you need AUX when the EX has BT connect. @_@
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 06:50 AM
  #12  
DWils's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 823
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by kenji815
why would you need AUX when the EX has BT connect. @_@
Better sound quality. Bluetooth < auxiliary.
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 06:54 AM
  #13  
Vanguard's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 690
From: Tennessee
5 Year Member
When we were making our decision on which level to purchase, one of the deciding factors was the fact we like the EX seat material better than the LX version, which we considered plain and boring (much like our 2008 Base Fit was).
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 08:51 AM
  #14  
exl500's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,436
From: Dunedin, Florida
5 Year Member
Same here. I liked the pattern in the EX seats. I also love the sunroof, the alloys look terrific, and I find the touchscreen completely intuitive. I almost forgot the smart key system, which I also really enjoy having.
 

Last edited by exl500; Oct 21, 2014 at 08:54 AM.
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 08:53 AM
  #15  
LxFit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 27
From: Tricities
No way Ex cloth looks better than the Lx. it is a bit thicker but on the seams its bunched up a bit , the Lx on the other hand is thinner and smoother with a symmetrical design with a bit of blue and grays...I think Lx fabric goes best with black Aegean blue, and modern metallic...

Also the sunroof only opened to the top of my head, so it was kind of pointless, as it added a bunch of weight to the top of car. The roof achieves the highest crush test scores in the segment by far.
Ive got no use for a sunroof on a sporty little car with only 1.5 liters of fury,
I need all of the stiffness, headroom, and mass centralized weight savings that you get, w/ no hole in roof...
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 09:36 AM
  #16  
Apexracing's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 119
From: camillus, ny
Originally Posted by LxFit
No way Ex cloth looks better than the Lx. it is a bit thicker but on the seams its bunched up a bit , the Lx on the other hand is thinner and smoother with a symmetrical design with a bit of blue and grays...I think Lx fabric goes best with black Aegean blue, and modern metallic...

Also the sunroof only opened to the top of my head, so it was kind of pointless, as it added a bunch of weight to the top of car. The roof achieves the highest crush test scores in the segment by far.
Ive got no use for a sunroof on a sporty little car with only 1.5 liters of fury,
I need all of the stiffness, headroom, and mass centralized weight savings that you get, w/ no hole in roof...
My ex seats are very smooth and well put together, maybe the ones you saw were defective. The moon roof assembly is maybe 40 pounds max. Which on a car with no rear sway bar, and with the worst two suspension designs to date added together why even worry about handling. The fit is actually a very very stiff chassis, its been beefed up quite a bit.
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 09:37 AM
  #17  
Apexracing's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 119
From: camillus, ny
Originally Posted by Lane03
After reading about some of the differences between these two models that are not listed on the Honda specifications, I thought it would be good to report them all in one thread. As there are also differences from market to market, this thread will only focus on the USDM. Please post any other differences (not listed on the Honda website) here to help other users.

LX has black trim on the front and rear vs the chrome on the EX
LX has different cloth material and design than the EX
LX does not have rear wheel fender liners like the EX
LX has unique underbody panels to obtain higher MPG than the EX

Idk how the under chassis panels are unique to the lx, my ex has them front to back......
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 10:07 AM
  #18  
Lane03's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 147
From: Florida
5 Year Member
Everyone, let's not turn this into an opinion thread as to why one person thinks one model or feature is "better" than the other. The purpose of the thread was only to list the differences that are not listed on the Honda website. Nothing more, nothing less.

Originally Posted by Apexracing
Idk how the under chassis panels are unique to the lx, my ex has them front to back......
I have no ideal. I posted it because I've seen several different users say that the LX has different paneling as well as articles online (see below link). The only way to know for sure would be to get the parts list from Honda or to put both the LX and EX on lifts for comparison.

http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2014/...014-Honda-Fit/
While all models have the same engine and transmission choices, it is the entry LX model with CVT ($17,115) that gets the top mileage rating of 33 mpg city, 41 highway and 36 mpg combined, on the recommended 87 octane. That’s 4 mpg better than the LX with six-speed manual and just slightly diminished from the midrange EX at 32/38/35 mpg. The LX is a bit more aerodynamically sleeker because of underbody panels that aren’t added to the EX, which is 60 to 129 pounds heavier with its added features.
 

Last edited by Lane03; Oct 21, 2014 at 10:12 AM.
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 11:05 AM
  #19  
GeorgeL's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,545
From: SoCal, CA
I would really like to see pictures of the bottom of both trims on a lift. I've heard of the supposed panels, but nobody has ever printed a picture showing the difference!
 
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 11:36 AM
  #20  
LxFit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 27
From: Tricities
2015 Fit doesn't need a rear swaybar because of its ultra high strength steel monocoque type body construction.
If you think it handles poorly you are mistaken, Put some sticky tires on it and lower it you might be amazed, the semi solid torsion beam rear kinda works like magic on a stiff short wheelbase front wheel drive car...

Also Look at the GK Fit racecars they don't have sunroofs... LX all day
 

Last edited by LxFit; Oct 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 AM.