Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Reference Library for Engine Modifications, Swaps and Tuning

KRAFTWERKS SUPERCHARGER aka (Jackson Racing)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 09:27 PM
  #721  
07_g_fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 50
From: Ontario
Originally Posted by tricolor
A 30 percent gain in torque that translate into A 50 percent increase in power: Does that mean the engine top RPM increased over it's 6500 stock? How does it make sense

30% ft/lb increase & 50% hp increase, at peak increase. To the best of my knowlegde 6500 limiter is the same.

Assuming that the blower adds 50% more air across the whole rev range (it doesn't). Keep in mind peak torque is made lower in the rpm range and drops after a certain point. For ex. lets say peak torque is at 4000 rpm, here the blower will give you 50% more of half the max air, (4000rpm is 60% of all available rpm) hence a 50*.6 = 30.

Since hp always climbs except for near the limiter, it will have 50% more of full air (6500rpm is 100% of all rpm) hence a higher gain. 50*.1 = 50

It's hard to explain and I think I may be just confusing people & my-self. But that's the best I can do at the moment, for reference: HP = torque * RPM / 5252

 
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #722  
tricolor's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 258
From: Montréal
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by 07_g_fit
30% ft/lb increase & 50% hp increase, at peak increase. To the best of my knowlegde 6500 limiter is the same.

Assuming that the blower adds 50% more air across the whole rev range (it doesn't). Keep in mind peak torque is made lower in the rpm range and drops after a certain point.
Yes, I forgot that the torque slope is not linear as the RPM increases. Can I assume that the blower isn't likely to provide full pressure (5psi) as the demand nears its peak

But anyhow, I am happy with the promised torque gains at low RPMs.
 
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 10:09 PM
  #723  
mrmandmman's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
From: Denver, Co
Originally Posted by tricolor
Yes, I forgot that the torque slope is not linear as the RPM increases. Can I assume that the blower isn't likely to provide full pressure (5psi) as the demand nears its peak

But anyhow, I am happy with the promised torque gains at low RPMs.

Coming from a turbo charged car I can say that it was always difficult to maintain full boost pressure at high rpms with a smaller turbo, because it could not flow enough air. I am not sure the size of the rotrex so you'd have to see on a gauge or learn from one of the testers
 

Last edited by OJRKraftWerks; Jan 24, 2008 at 02:59 PM. Reason: Remove old, confusing information :)
Old Jan 23, 2008 | 11:59 PM
  #724  
Lyshk0's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 115
From: Miramar, FL
Originally Posted by mrmandmman
I haven't been able to find a Siphon to be able to read the article so perhaps you could shed a little light on it for me. Fuel economy is very important to me (environmental and foreign dependence not as much economical) so I was wondering what the results were, you mentioned a slight increase seen by someone but I wonder if this would be typical given similar driving habits. (would depend on the ecu tune I guess)

Also, given that I am in a high altitude (CO), and not knowing specifically how the Honda ecu and the map with the SC work, would running at a higher altitude make the car run slightly richer in comparison with the same car at sea level. I am wondering because a MAF sensor just measures the speed of the air if I recall correctly and I am not sure how or if the ecu corrects for density with the fuel mixture or something.

I am not sure if it is planned or not, but comparisons showing pre and post SC fuel mileage in similar driving conditions (temp, route, etc..) might go a long way convincing others like me it would be a fun purchase (that this won't hurt our wallet/environment etc. daily).
i believe the maf mesures the speed, and temp of the air charge at the same time. with both of those (and given to constant size of piping where the maf is, and density of air at a given temp) it can calculate the actual mass of the air entering the intake manifold. maf's are calibrated to the diameter of pipe where they are installed, and have extremely delicate elements. if you think there may be a problem with contamination or something like that, you can clean the element with non-chlorinated brake cleaner. im not sure about the one on the fit, but on my other cars the maf sensor element looked like a thin metal thread in a plastic tube with one side exposed (goes about 3/4's of the way down the tube). kinda like this (i). if you're looking down the open tube.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 12:16 AM
  #725  
claymore's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,276
From: Hotter than the SUN
Hello the FIT doesn't use a MAF sensor it uses a MAP sensor.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 02:27 AM
  #726  
mrmandmman's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 13
From: Denver, Co
Originally Posted by claymore
Hello the FIT doesn't use a MAF sensor it uses a MAP sensor.
Well dang, guess I am a few years behind... I haven't had to work on anything yet!
 

Last edited by mrmandmman; Jan 24, 2008 at 02:30 AM.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 07:28 AM
  #727  
Lyshk0's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 115
From: Miramar, FL
Originally Posted by claymore
Hello the FIT doesn't use a MAF sensor it uses a MAP sensor.
LOL!! i guess i need to learn more about the fit hahaha never had to do anything, and i run stock class so no intake for me yet lol
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 11:02 AM
  #728  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by tricolor
Yes, I forgot that the torque slope is not linear as the RPM increases. Can I assume that the blower isn't likely to provide full pressure (5psi) as the demand nears its peak

But anyhow, I am happy with the promised torque gains at low RPMs.

the torque on the dyno sheet seems pretty linear to me.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 11:31 AM
  #729  
REXXXXXXXXX's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 805
From: N Jersey
Hey Chris!
The days are dragging by and im itching to get my supercharger. In the meantime, just to humor us, why don't you share a story or two of your feats. There's gotta be at least one good story of how you burned an unsuspecting racer at a light or embarrassed some tough guy who once thought he had a fast car. Im not concerned with numbers at the moment, I wanna hear what this baby can do!
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 12:04 PM
  #730  
manxman's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,288
From: Boulder Creek, CA, USA
Same here! Good post REXXXXXXXXX.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 12:37 PM
  #731  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
+1




i'd love to hear some more stories. numbers are numbers, but real world butt dyno's are even better.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 12:53 PM
  #732  
kennef's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 604
From: washington, dc
oscar,

could you post a link or two regarding the supercard engine management software? will something like a tactrix cable or other suitable obd2 interface be able to reflash the supercard, or will you make the necessary interface available for sale at some point?

and for everyone else, here's a link for perusing -
http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/images_...infoC15-16.pdf
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 01:37 PM
  #733  
SickFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 965
From: Florida
I find it akward that after reading the charts and info that were on the pdfs that MRM posted up earlier show that the 10psi kit had 150whp. But what i'm trying to think about was that wasnt this the older kit? Because if i read right, the newer kits on 5psi should be making 130 to 145 whp? Please correct me if i'm wrong. Thanks guys.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #734  
ToyotaLover's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 688
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by SickFit
I find it akward that after reading the charts and info that were on the pdfs that MRM posted up earlier show that the 10psi kit had 150whp. But what i'm trying to think about was that wasnt this the older kit? Because if i read right, the newer kits on 5psi should be making 130 to 145 whp? Please correct me if i'm wrong. Thanks guys.
it's 155whp on a 5spd with 5lbs of boost and full modded exhaust system including going catless.

more accurate info is on the siphon mag.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #735  
OJRKraftWerks's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 559
From: Norco, CA
Originally Posted by SickFit
I find it akward that after reading the charts and info that were on the pdfs that MRM posted up earlier show that the 10psi kit had 150whp. But what i'm trying to think about was that wasnt this the older kit? Because if i read right, the newer kits on 5psi should be making 130 to 145 whp? Please correct me if i'm wrong. Thanks guys.
Those PDFs are old and show the old inefficient setup. I will remove them to avoid any further confusion.

-Oscar Jackson Jr.
 

Last edited by OJRKraftWerks; Jan 24, 2008 at 02:58 PM.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 02:44 PM
  #736  
SickFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 965
From: Florida
Awesome thanks.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #737  
OJRKraftWerks's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 559
From: Norco, CA
Originally Posted by kennef
oscar,

could you post a link or two regarding the supercard engine management software? will something like a tactrix cable or other suitable obd2 interface be able to reflash the supercard, or will you make the necessary interface available for sale at some point?

and for everyone else, here's a link for perusing -
http://www.w2wpowertrain.com/images_...infoC15-16.pdf
The SuperCard is a sealed unit, and is not able to be reflashed.

-Oscar Jackson Jr.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #738  
OJRKraftWerks's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 559
From: Norco, CA
Originally Posted by tricolor
Can I assume that the blower isn't likely to provide full pressure (5psi) as the demand nears its peak
I'm confused... peak what?

The supercharger is connected by the crankshaft, and thus turns faster at higher RPMs. The figure 5 PSI means that the greatest amount of boost you will see from this supercharger system is 5 PSI. You will see about 5 PSI at high RPMs.

Boost pressure is also determined by conditions and modifications.

-Oscar Jackson Jr.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 03:07 PM
  #739  
OJRKraftWerks's Avatar
Former Vendor
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 559
From: Norco, CA
Originally Posted by mrmandmman
Coming from a turbo charged car I can say that it was always difficult to maintain full boost pressure at high rpms with a smaller turbo, because it could not flow enough air. I am not sure the size of the rotrex so you'd have to see on a gauge or learn from one of the testers
There are multiple reasons the small turbo begins to lose pressure after peak torque...

The Rotrex does not have this issue. It continues to spin and be efficient throughout the rev range.

-Oscar Jackson Jr.
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 03:55 PM
  #740  
REXXXXXXXXX's Avatar
Frequent FitFreak Poster
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 805
From: N Jersey
There are multiple reasons the small turbo begins to lose pressure after peak torque...

The Rotrex does not have this issue. It continues to spin and be efficient throughout the rev range.
You're killin me Oscar lol! It gets better and better ever day! Im getting to be like a 9-year old on crack on Christmas EVE!
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.