Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Reference Library for Engine Modifications, Swaps and Tuning

KWSC Kit Release Ramblings

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 01:00 AM
  #501  
Wytt's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 169
From: Arleta, CA
5 Year Member
Hey Tom, how the clearance between the Mugen Header and the Intake Pipe of the KWSC? I'm debating between either Mugen or T1R.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 08:43 AM
  #502  
bschook5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by eldaino
thats weird...and very disheartening. the dynos from kw with just the base kit insinuate a pretty dang good amount of power over stock.
Well I did have the weapon-R race headers (no cat) installed before putting on the S/C so wasnt going from completely stock.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 09:33 AM
  #503  
DynamicFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 423
From: Aliso Viejo, CA
Originally Posted by Wytt
Hey Tom, how the clearance between the Mugen Header and the Intake Pipe of the KWSC? I'm debating between either Mugen or T1R.
As with most things in the install all the pieces can be moved around a bit. The clearance with my setup is about a good 1 to 1.5 inches. If you guys are really looking to lower intake temps, I would recommend wrapping the suction pipe rather than doing the header, seems better than just doing the 1 primary off the header. If you intended on wrapping your header anyways just do that, but I personally wouldn't want to hide all that "Mugen goodness".
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:20 AM
  #504  
Wave's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,093
From: Long Island, New York
maybe someone can MacGuyver some sort of metal heat shield between the header and intake tube?
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #505  
wlfit's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 124
From: DC
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by bschook5
I would take and post some vids, but there isnt much point. With the base kit and stock exhaust on the M/T I really cant feel a whole lot difference between before (had full exhaust/cat delete/race header) So if I cant feel much difference, doubt would be able to see any. I sure hope w/the Hondata upgrade/bigger injectors and putting my full exhaust back on I get a nice increase, cause so far I really dont think its worth what it cost.
Thanks dude - that's what I want to hear. No one has really come out with hard numbers on acceleration times for some reason...
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 12:23 PM
  #506  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by bschook5
I would take and post some vids, but there isnt much point. With the base kit and stock exhaust on the M/T I really cant feel a whole lot difference between before (had full exhaust/cat delete/race header) So if I cant feel much difference, doubt would be able to see any. I sure hope w/the Hondata upgrade/bigger injectors and putting my full exhaust back on I get a nice increase, cause so far I really dont think its worth what it cost.
Your kit must not be installed correctly? If you cannot feel the difference then something is wrong. My car was WAY faster than it was stock with the base kit... and even with the OLD kit, and I had the same mods.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 12:56 PM
  #507  
bschook5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: Royse City, TX
I can feel a difference but its not much. My brother has a bone stock M/T fit and he drove mine w/the Base S/C kit installed and he couldnt tell that much difference either. We even raced, and mine was just a little quicker.

I dont see what could be installed wrong, I just put a boost gauge on and im showing just a tad under 5psi at WOT near redline, so seems like its getting the full ammount of boost.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 01:30 PM
  #508  
leonine's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,710
From: The Twilight Zone
5 Year Member
that seems to be the stock answer and while i recall one confirmed install problem reported here the rest of the people i have spoken to seem to have stuff installed correclty. I even compared my install with that of a fellow fitfreak who has the kit on his m/t and all the connections looked the same. my performance shop also confirmed that things were connected correclty when i installed it.

I am now running rc 195cc injectors successfully. no CEL and i have gained back that lost oomph. the injectors combined with stronger clamps did the trick. now my a/f at WOT is from 10.7 to 11.5 from 3500 to redline. before it was 11.8 to 13.6 and it seems to me that there was alot of air and not enough fuel at the higher rpm range which was resulting in me not going anywhere (compared to without s/c) when i stomped on it.

This may/may not apply to others who have encountered this problem when running rich from the 205's becuase my setup may be slightly different. but for those not wanting to spend the money for the hondata this MIGHT be another option if you are running headers that have slightly larger primaries or a 50mm exhaust.

Just food for thought.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #509  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by leonine
I am now running rc 195cc injectors successfully. no CEL and i have gained back that lost oomph. the injectors combined with stronger clamps did the trick. now my a/f at WOT is from 10.7 to 11.5 from 3500 to redline. before it was 11.8 to 13.6 and it seems to me that there was alot of air and not enough fuel at the higher rpm range which was resulting in me not going anywhere (compared to without s/c) when i stomped on it.
Many thanks for posting that info!

I wonder if the clamps were at fault previously and not the 205cc injectors? Anyways, the 195cc are in range, sounds good enough to me. That gives me renewed hope!
 

Last edited by xorbe; Jun 12, 2008 at 02:27 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:21 PM
  #510  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by bschook5
Well I did have the weapon-R race headers (no cat) installed before putting on the S/C so wasnt going from completely stock.

hmmm, i'm gonna have to agree with jdmchris on this one, even having a 'race' header and cat delete shouldn't yield SOOO much power, its already been discussed that a cat delete does add a few horsies, but not a gargantuan amount, and certainly not enough to make the supercharger install feel like only a slight bump in hp.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:28 PM
  #511  
bschook5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by eldaino
hmmm, i'm gonna have to agree with jdmchris on this one, even having a 'race' header and cat delete shouldn't yield SOOO much power, its already been discussed that a cat delete does add a few horsies, but not a gargantuan amount, and certainly not enough to make the supercharger install feel like only a slight bump in hp.
Well anyone thats east of the Dallas,TX area that wants to come ride/drive the car and see how it feels for themselves is welcome... Wish someone around here had the base kit as well so could take a ride in there car to see if it felt the same...
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #512  
leonine's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,710
From: The Twilight Zone
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by xorbe
Many thanks for posting that info!

I wonder if the clamps were at fault previously and not the 205cc injectors? Anyways, the 195cc are in range, sounds good enough to me. That gives me renewed hope!
it is possible but i don't think likely. my a/f ratio with the 205's even when the stock clamps were just put on was 10.0 or possibly below. It seems that the stock ecu does not like a/f somewhere below 10.6.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:40 PM
  #513  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by eldaino
hmmm, i'm gonna have to agree with jdmchris on this one, even having a 'race' header and cat delete shouldn't yield SOOO much power, its already been discussed that a cat delete does add a few horsies, but not a gargantuan amount, and certainly not enough to make the supercharger install feel like only a slight bump in hp.
(edited, heh!) Plain base m/t kit is +28whp (93->121). That's why everyone also wanted the injectors / header / exhaust for the +23whp after that (121->144).

I'm hoping the a/t kit makes it to 125whp with 195cc injectors / t1r / 50mm exhaust.
 

Last edited by xorbe; Jun 12, 2008 at 02:59 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:45 PM
  #514  
bschook5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: Royse City, TX
base kit is +28whp, (93-121)

Originally Posted by xorbe
Plain base m/t kit is only +18whp (93->121). That's why everyone wanted the injectors / header / exhaust for the +23whp after that (121->144).

I'm hoping the a/t kit makes it to 125whp with 195cc injectors / t1r / 50mm exhaust.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 02:58 PM
  #515  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by bschook5
base kit is +28whp, (93-121)
oh crap i fail it! oh man that's embarrassing... and i got quoted too!
 

Last edited by xorbe; Jun 12, 2008 at 03:01 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #516  
SickFit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 965
From: Florida
Originally Posted by bschook5
I can feel a difference but its not much. My brother has a bone stock M/T fit and he drove mine w/the Base S/C kit installed and he couldnt tell that much difference either. We even raced, and mine was just a little quicker.

I dont see what could be installed wrong, I just put a boost gauge on and im showing just a tad under 5psi at WOT near redline, so seems like its getting the full ammount of boost.
Interesting. Being that you have the kit and I dont I cant say I dont agree with you but I have a slight idea that Chris may be right about something. With the s/c kit base vs. a stock car, you should be whoring it. I have a Fit with Full header and exhaust and I raped Fits with CAI and Axle-backs by about 2-3 cars and thats only with full exhaust against another Fit that has some bolt-ons.

Very interesting.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 04:18 PM
  #517  
bschook5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 116
From: Royse City, TX
hmmm I will see if I can race my brother again tonight in his stock fit... first time was right after I got the S/C installed.

Anyone with just the base kit on a m/t could you try and time your 0-60? I will try to time mine tonight too, maybe can compare that...


Originally Posted by SickFit
Interesting. Being that you have the kit and I dont I cant say I dont agree with you but I have a slight idea that Chris may be right about something. With the s/c kit base vs. a stock car, you should be whoring it. I have a Fit with Full header and exhaust and I raped Fits with CAI and Axle-backs by about 2-3 cars and thats only with full exhaust against another Fit that has some bolt-ons.

Very interesting.
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #518  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by bschook5
hmmm I will see if I can race my brother again tonight in his stock fit... first time was right after I got the S/C installed.

Anyone with just the base kit on a m/t could you try and time your 0-60? I will try to time mine tonight too, maybe can compare that...

yes please do!
 
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #519  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by xorbe
(edited, heh!) Plain base m/t kit is +28whp (93->121). That's why everyone also wanted the injectors / header / exhaust for the +23whp after that (121->144).

I'm hoping the a/t kit makes it to 125whp with 195cc injectors / t1r / 50mm exhaust.

yeah, but even that much to the wheels should represent a BIG difference, at least in one's butt dyno! considering out powetrain losses, +28whp would mean we were rocking at LEAST a 130-140 hp fit, which should be significantly faster than cars who make that kind of hp to the crank and weigh more.

and i agree, i'd love the base a/t to make it to 125, at least 115 to the wheels.
 

Last edited by eldaino; Jun 12, 2008 at 05:01 PM.
Old Jun 12, 2008 | 05:08 PM
  #520  
xorbe's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,082
From: Bay Area, CA USA
5 Year Member
My plan is to vid the speedo 0-80 mph. Then I can take the delta between the frame numbers for 5/10 mph to 60 mph and 80 mph with 33ms (0.033s) resolution. I have no bright ideas for timing from 0mph with "some" reproducibility on a budget. I just want ballpark hard numbers for each of my attempted mods, pulley, wheels, kit.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 PM.