What you DONT like about your Fit
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 692
From: bay area, cali
...but i'm making the complaint because i WANT to let folks in when they're using their blinkers. it's easy karma points.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,417
From: Capital Distric New York
Highway MPG
Top End gearing in my 2010 Sport MT. What was Honda thinking
In my rural/suburban driving world I see 38MPG average out of the last 3 tankfuls. I like this - reinforces why I bought a FIT.
Problem comes on the open road. Turnpike driving returns a 34-35MPG over a 900M round trip. Now it's still nothing to complain about but it baffles me that it's less than my local driving.
Never had a car that was set-up this way. Then I notice the top end on the AT is a better ratio than the MT in the GE8's.
Some one please explain this to me
K_C_
In my rural/suburban driving world I see 38MPG average out of the last 3 tankfuls. I like this - reinforces why I bought a FIT.
Problem comes on the open road. Turnpike driving returns a 34-35MPG over a 900M round trip. Now it's still nothing to complain about but it baffles me that it's less than my local driving.
Never had a car that was set-up this way. Then I notice the top end on the AT is a better ratio than the MT in the GE8's.
Some one please explain this to me
K_C_
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,222
From: San Antonio
Top End gearing in my 2010 Sport MT. What was Honda thinking
In my rural/suburban driving world I see 38MPG average out of the last 3 tankfuls. I like this - reinforces why I bought a FIT.
Problem comes on the open road. Turnpike driving returns a 34-35MPG over a 900M round trip. Now it's still nothing to complain about but it baffles me that it's less than my local driving.
Never had a car that was set-up this way. Then I notice the top end on the AT is a better ratio than the MT in the GE8's.
Some one please explain this to me
K_C_
In my rural/suburban driving world I see 38MPG average out of the last 3 tankfuls. I like this - reinforces why I bought a FIT.
Problem comes on the open road. Turnpike driving returns a 34-35MPG over a 900M round trip. Now it's still nothing to complain about but it baffles me that it's less than my local driving.
Never had a car that was set-up this way. Then I notice the top end on the AT is a better ratio than the MT in the GE8's.
Some one please explain this to me
K_C_
From the California Energy Center:
Drag increases exponentially.
i found that the blindspots were tricky because of the small window at the back and the back seat headrests almost block your view, you get used to it though... as for the convexx mirror i dont have one but i imagine it would
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,058
From: SoCal/Castaic
Top End gearing in my 2010 Sport MT. What was Honda thinking
In my rural/suburban driving world I see 38MPG average out of the last 3 tankfuls. I like this - reinforces why I bought a FIT.
Problem comes on the open road. Turnpike driving returns a 34-35MPG over a 900M round trip. Now it's still nothing to complain about but it baffles me that it's less than my local driving.
Never had a car that was set-up this way. Then I notice the top end on the AT is a better ratio than the MT in the GE8's.
Some one please explain this to me
K_C_
In my rural/suburban driving world I see 38MPG average out of the last 3 tankfuls. I like this - reinforces why I bought a FIT.
Problem comes on the open road. Turnpike driving returns a 34-35MPG over a 900M round trip. Now it's still nothing to complain about but it baffles me that it's less than my local driving.
Never had a car that was set-up this way. Then I notice the top end on the AT is a better ratio than the MT in the GE8's.
Some one please explain this to me
K_C_
The gearing is fine to me. The engine is smooth, and 3K rpm at highway speed is nothing bad. The reason they chose these ratios is because the engine needs to be spinning at those speeds to provide the power for the load. If it spun at a lower rpm, it would be loaded more and the MPG would decrease. That's how I think.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,417
From: Capital Distric New York
I easily get over 40 MPG with my 2010 MT. If you increase the speed, you are fighting the wind. That is why you are getting better mileage in rural driving.
The gearing is fine to me. The engine is smooth, and 3K rpm at highway speed is nothing bad. The reason they chose these ratios is because the engine needs to be spinning at those speeds to provide the power for the load. If it spun at a lower rpm, it would be loaded more and the MPG would decrease. That's how I think.
The gearing is fine to me. The engine is smooth, and 3K rpm at highway speed is nothing bad. The reason they chose these ratios is because the engine needs to be spinning at those speeds to provide the power for the load. If it spun at a lower rpm, it would be loaded more and the MPG would decrease. That's how I think.
My highway cruise is @ 70MPH. I've only had one long run, but two weeks and I'll do my round trip to Bangor, ME again so I'll check it then. This weekend I'm heading down to North Jersey, a shorter run and smoother terrain, so I'll get a better feel for things, but I'm not thinking I'll see 40MPG, but my FIT does continue to surprise me. I'll post back.
K_C_
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,222
From: San Antonio
In my Element (with its terrible aerodynamic profile) I once got 26 mpg on a highway trip that was limited to about 50 mph due to road conditions.
On the regular freeway or interstate, it was usually in the 21-22 range.
On the regular freeway or interstate, it was usually in the 21-22 range.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 322
From: Running Springs, CA
Ive only had the 2010 Base M/T for two weeks and 500 miles, so these are first impressions, coming from a 1999 Camry V-6.
After reading many, but not all posts of this thread, Im glad I didnt get the sport with the lower bumpers. It doesnt scrape in places where the Camry did.
#1 complaint: not directionally stable on the freeway. I think/hope this is a tire issue. I have to constantly correct, where the Camry (on Michelin Pilots) was a great freeway cruiser. Much of our pavement is grooved concrete and this Fit feels like a motorycle on it, constantly hunting for center. Any suggestions for optimum tire pressures with the stock Dunlops? Or, is it related to electric power steering, which should, but maybe not, revert to manual steering at speed?
#2 complaint: M/T gearing is too aggressive. The engine has more than enough torque to handle taller gears. I once had a BMW with less off the line grunt, but it ran 3000rpm@70mph with a direct drive 5th gear. The Fit is about 3500rpm@70mph with OD. I realize this is primarily a city car, but at least the M/T model should have the same final drive ratio as the auto.
I actually dont miss the extra gadgets that the Camry had, or the quiet. That car would put you to sleep, which may be why Camry drivers seem so dangerous. I like to hear the engine and dont need or want things like automatic headlights.
After reading many, but not all posts of this thread, Im glad I didnt get the sport with the lower bumpers. It doesnt scrape in places where the Camry did.
#1 complaint: not directionally stable on the freeway. I think/hope this is a tire issue. I have to constantly correct, where the Camry (on Michelin Pilots) was a great freeway cruiser. Much of our pavement is grooved concrete and this Fit feels like a motorycle on it, constantly hunting for center. Any suggestions for optimum tire pressures with the stock Dunlops? Or, is it related to electric power steering, which should, but maybe not, revert to manual steering at speed?
#2 complaint: M/T gearing is too aggressive. The engine has more than enough torque to handle taller gears. I once had a BMW with less off the line grunt, but it ran 3000rpm@70mph with a direct drive 5th gear. The Fit is about 3500rpm@70mph with OD. I realize this is primarily a city car, but at least the M/T model should have the same final drive ratio as the auto.
I actually dont miss the extra gadgets that the Camry had, or the quiet. That car would put you to sleep, which may be why Camry drivers seem so dangerous. I like to hear the engine and dont need or want things like automatic headlights.
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 577
From: Conn
Tire pressure
#1 complaint: not directionally stable on the freeway. I think/hope this is a tire issue. I have to constantly correct, where the Camry (on Michelin Pilots) was a great freeway cruiser. Much of our pavement is grooved concrete and this Fit feels like a motorycle on it, constantly hunting for center. Any suggestions for optimum tire pressures with the stock Dunlops? Or, is it related to electric power steering, which should, but maybe not, revert to manual steering at speed?
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,074
From: Oregon
I agree with all those saying the carpet in The Fit is very low quality. I did not put it down as one of my personal things I do not like, because I was aware of it's cheapness before I purchased from reading forums like this.
I also think most people, myself included, put mats down. So as long as it looks alright, I don't really care how thin it might be.
I would say The Fit almosts demands that you buy some quality mats. I have OEM Honda All-Weather, which are fine. The dealer threw them in the deal for free. I kind of wish I had angled for another freebie and simply bought weathertech mats to start with, from what I've seen I like them better.
I also think most people, myself included, put mats down. So as long as it looks alright, I don't really care how thin it might be.
I would say The Fit almosts demands that you buy some quality mats. I have OEM Honda All-Weather, which are fine. The dealer threw them in the deal for free. I kind of wish I had angled for another freebie and simply bought weathertech mats to start with, from what I've seen I like them better.
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 143
From: Oklahoma
BSP paint scratches very easily
Seat upholstery doubles as a lint brush
Interior plastic scratches easily
I guess these things just bother me more with my Fit because it's the first new car I ever bought and I'm trying to keep it in perfect condition. If it were used, I probably wouldn't care as much.
Seat upholstery doubles as a lint brush
Interior plastic scratches easily
I guess these things just bother me more with my Fit because it's the first new car I ever bought and I'm trying to keep it in perfect condition. If it were used, I probably wouldn't care as much.
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 3,417
From: Capital Distric New York
BSP paint scratches very easily
Seat upholstery doubles as a lint brush
Interior plastic scratches easily
I guess these things just bother me more with my Fit because it's the first new car I ever bought and I'm trying to keep it in perfect condition. If it were used, I probably wouldn't care as much.
Seat upholstery doubles as a lint brush
Interior plastic scratches easily
I guess these things just bother me more with my Fit because it's the first new car I ever bought and I'm trying to keep it in perfect condition. If it were used, I probably wouldn't care as much.
The BEST thing for keeping those seats clean is a simple micro-fiber cloth. Nothing added, just wipe 'em down and watch all that crap go by the bye.
Can't say I've noticed the interior plastic bits being a problem.
As far as keeping it in "perfect" condition - long ago I settled that one. I don't live in a perfect world, so why try? Good begets Good plain and simple.
Be nice to your FIT and it will be nice to you. Welcome and happy driving.
K_C_
edit: any where near Broken Arrow?
Someone that spends HER life on FitFreak.net
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,963
From: Houston TX
Yeah, you can only keep the dings away for so long and then...suddenly you have a crapload of them all at once...I recommend getting into an argument with another car's bumper and you get perspective on those dings. 
As for me, the city I live in has really BAD streets...the ride is damn harsh and noisy...If the Fit had a quieter ride and better paint, it would be my ideal car.
As for me, the city I live in has really BAD streets...the ride is damn harsh and noisy...If the Fit had a quieter ride and better paint, it would be my ideal car.
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 577
From: Conn
I agree with you completely on these accounts. I beat mine (08 MT Sport) and I still get over 30 mpg when I do. When I don't, I get 36 mpg mixed driving.
