General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 10:49 AM
  #261  
trowpa's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 191
From: Pennsylvania
Wow that seems low! My worst tank thus far has been 32.6 and that was after spending 40 minutes to go 3 miles in traffic on a road trip loaded with luggage best tank was 37.8 (on the way down on the same road trip - without the traffic jam)
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 10:53 AM
  #262  
Sol705's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 31
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by trowpa
Wow that seems low! My worst tank thus far has been 32.6 and that was after spending 40 minutes to go 3 miles in traffic on a road trip loaded with luggage best tank was 37.8 (on the way down on the same road trip - without the traffic jam)
yeah there's a stoplight on every corner in New York City. I was told by my brother in law that I'd be lucky to get 26 MPG.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #263  
crimsona's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 428
From: Vancouver, Canada
Originally Posted by Sol705
yeah there's a stoplight on every corner in New York City. I was told by my brother in law that I'd be lucky to get 26 MPG.
Finally another person who understands the pain of a stoplight on every corner. Vancouver isn't quite as populated, but with one highway total, population is dense, and the whole city is quite hilly. Hell even downtown vancouver is built on a hill of sorts.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #264  
Sol705's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 31
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by crimsona
Finally another person who understands the pain of a stoplight on every corner. Vancouver isn't quite as populated, but with one highway total, population is dense, and the whole city is quite hilly. Hell even downtown vancouver is built on a hill of sorts.
My other brother-in-law lives in San Francisco, a city with a stoplight on every corner and many many hills Got so bad for him, he had to buy a Corolla (didn't know about the Fit) to save on gas, and the guy's about 6 feet, 250 pounds!

I'll take a picture of the street to show everyone here what I have to deal with everyday.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:15 AM
  #265  
milano sol's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
From: Irvine, CA
well ive had the car for a lil over 2 weeks and just a shade under 2,000 miles now.....

my gas started crappy and now im pulling consistant 31 mpg per tank. this is at 80 miles per day just for work and back....drive the 57 freeway in So Cal....for those that know this is a traffic freeway all day. so given that its pretty much similar to city driving its not bad now. still wanting to see if mpg go up after first oil change.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:19 AM
  #266  
Sol705's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 31
From: Brooklyn, NY
Originally Posted by milano sol
well ive had the car for a lil over 2 weeks and just a shade under 2,000 miles now.....

my gas started crappy and now im pulling consistant 31 mpg per tank. this is at 80 miles per day just for work and back....drive the 57 freeway in So Cal....for those that know this is a traffic freeway all day. so given that its pretty much similar to city driving its not bad now. still wanting to see if mpg go up after first oil change.
Wait, you mean to tell us that you're averageing 1k miles per week?
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #267  
VelociRacer's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 59
From: Earth
Originally Posted by melvin
Hmm, very interesting indeed. It makes sense that a dealer would short cut this procedure for the sake of saving 20-30 minutes during PDI.

I do this everytime I change the air or fuel filter, clean the throttle plate, clear MIL. Well, I never waited for the rad fan to cycle 2 times, but usually let idle with no interaction or accessories for 5-10 minutes. It never hurt anything, and it has the potential to re-calibrate the fuel map if it was askew.

I don't have a Fit, yet. But I do have a 99 Civic EX Coupe MT (Canada's Si Coupe) with 156k miles and averages 37mpg of 80/20 HWY/CITY.

Anyone who is dissatisfied with their fuel economy should do this:

1-Find the radio security code. Open the fues box in the engine compartment and pull the "Back-up, Radio" fuse for 1 minute then re-install. Close the hood to allow car to warm up faster.
2-Start the car and let idle with 0 input or accessories/electrical load. Wait for Rad fan to start and stop 2 times. It could take upto 30 minutes, so make sure you are not in a hurry, the car is in a safe place with ventilation if you wish to leave her running.
3-Compare fuel mileage after you run thru a full tank of gas.

Again, this procedure should not hurt, it can only help you. I've been doing it for years.
 
Old Aug 1, 2006 | 02:54 PM
  #268  
milano sol's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 447
From: Irvine, CA
Originally Posted by Sol705
Wait, you mean to tell us that you're averageing 1k miles per week?
no no no....im averaging about 760 per week

just from work and back alone is 80 miles per day 5 days a week. plus whatever running aroudn and errands adds up.
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 05:54 AM
  #269  
Balorn's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 28
From: Austin, TX
First (dealer) tank, started out driving from San Antonio to Austin, then about 60% highway, 40% in traffic (distance-wise), AC on almost all the time (hey, it's Texas, in July), 29.46 MPG.

Second tank, same driving habits minus the drive from San Antonio, 27.12 MPG.

I was hoping for more, but it's better than the PT Cruiser I was driving before (under 20 MPG on that, same route).
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 08:20 AM
  #270  
carlosalicea's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 599
From: Puerto Rico
Originally Posted by Balorn
First (dealer) tank, started out driving from San Antonio to Austin, then about 60% highway, 40% in traffic (distance-wise), AC on almost all the time (hey, it's Texas, in July), 29.46 MPG.

Second tank, same driving habits minus the drive from San Antonio, 27.12 MPG.

I was hoping for more, but it's better than the PT Cruiser I was driving before (under 20 MPG on that, same route).
It should get better on time (like mine, now I am getting average 34mpg wich is great) but, the gas ssavings are controled by the right foot. Nice to Know that you're geting much better than the pt.
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 08:42 AM
  #271  
MURZ's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 12
From: Madisonville, La.
I am averaging about 34.5 on the interstate at 70mph, but have got as high as 38.6. The key is to keep the revs low. I have been using my paddle shifters to shift sooner than the tranny would to keep the revs under 3k. I also have 38lbs in my tires. I use my car for work and travel about 4000 miles a month so I can keep you guys posted as soon as I put together a log.
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #272  
trowpa's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 191
From: Pennsylvania
Keeping revs low - I try to do that, but i just can't keep it over 60 on hills unless I allow it to downshift.... What's your strategy? You live in flat area? or do you try to speed up before hills for a "running start"?
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 10:29 AM
  #273  
Balorn's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 28
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by trowpa
Keeping revs low - I try to do that, but i just can't keep it over 60 on hills unless I allow it to downshift.... What's your strategy? You live in flat area? or do you try to speed up before hills for a "running start"?
I think that's another thing holding me below 30 MPG - there's lots of little hills in North Austin. None of the ones I drive daily are tremendously big or steep, but many are just big and steep enough to force a downshift.
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #274  
gilbie99's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
From: Littlerock, CA
usa 38mpg/japan 48 mpg????????

why is this, and how can i make my new fit give me 48 mpg...dont worry about smog test, ive got that covered??????
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:05 PM
  #275  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
maybe 48 on the 1.3?
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #276  
gilbie99's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
From: Littlerock, CA
well, the front page of this web site, under specs shows 48 mpg for a 1.5.....i dont know i just got mine last night and started loking today.....so is it not right info?????
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #277  
brdss's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 208
From: chicago
Originally Posted by gilbie99
why is this, and how can i make my new fit give me 48 mpg...dont worry about smog test, ive got that covered??????
Tow it with another vehicle!


there are big differences between the 2 vehicles, including engine, transmission, and vehicle weight. Not to mention that the testing to come up with the MPG figures is different there than here.
 

Last edited by brdss; Aug 3, 2006 at 01:33 PM.
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #278  
gilbie99's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
From: Littlerock, CA
or just drive it down hill huh.....
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #279  
JDMchris.com's Avatar
I run THIS
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 12,411
From: Riverside
5 Year Member
maybe 48mpg is rated on the 1.3 and not the 1.5?
 
Old Aug 3, 2006 | 01:33 PM
  #280  
gilbie99's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 27
From: Littlerock, CA
Originally Posted by JDMchris.com
maybe 48mpg is rated on the 1.3 and not the 1.5?
nope....www.fitfreak.net look at the home page over in the right side under specs....has specs for no. america at38mpg for the 1.5 sport and for japan, asia, 48mpg for the 1.5 sport......

unless that info is incorrect, or that applies for the jazz
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:32 PM.