Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Reference Library for Engine Modifications, Swaps and Tuning

K&N Filter kit for a Jazz

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2006 | 04:31 PM
  #161  
805FitSport's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 466
From: Oxnard, CA
Originally Posted by kocba
Its not true in general - depends on construction of CAI.

I know a guy, who is a pro in engine tuning. He has been dynoing a car (Civic with B18 engine).

1st with CAI
2nd with Short Ram

Conclusion was, that the engine torque and power curve was constant (a smooth line without drops) with Shot Ram. With CAI the curve showed a significant drop of T and P in the mid range of RPM. In both cases ECU tuning was applied and dynoed. Both applications used the same filter.

Of course it depends on the engine disposition and construction of CAI.

One more thing (imho), if you are applying any open pod systems (CAI or Short Ram), you need to reset the ECU for max. achievement (so ECU will adjust from scratch) -> its simply done by disconecting the main supply at the battery.
a civic is not a Fit, the Fits ECU like most new cars today will respond better to cold airs everytime.
 
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 06:39 PM
  #162  
4dr4life!'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 355
From: Torrance, California
Just got word that my K&N filter kit should arrive sometime next week
 
Old Jan 8, 2007 | 10:45 AM
  #163  
4dr4life!'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 355
From: Torrance, California
For you members waiting for this product
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/112649-post12.html
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 12:49 AM
  #164  
Oofie's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 119
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by 4dr4life!
For you members waiting for this product
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/112649-post12.html
Is it worth it? How's your gas mileage? I drive about 200 miles a day and Im looking for something that will help my gas mileage. Im still debating on whether I should get the drop in filter or the short ram intake.
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 12:57 AM
  #165  
4dr4life!'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 355
From: Torrance, California
Cant tell right now since I just installed it. I did have the drop-in and it help.
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 11:14 AM
  #166  
docjim2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 431
From: Marietta, GA
BUT they look cool!!
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 11:23 AM
  #167  
manxman's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,288
From: Boulder Creek, CA, USA
Originally Posted by 4dr4life!
Cant tell right now since I just installed it. I did have the drop-in and it help.
Oofie & 4dr:
I registered with the K & N site for info. on new products in the works for Fits back in September. When they Emailed about the drop-in filter, I bought and installed it. But because the OEM air box has a "muffler", that translates to me as restrictive baffling to reduce noise. I did notice a slight MPG increase with the drop-in filter. I just ordered the "Typhoon" SRI kit because with no muffler, restriction must also be reduced. Although the Fujita SRI is somewhat cheaper, I have read complaints about its crooked fit in the engine bay. I decided to spend more on the K & N because of decades of good experience with their quality and effectiveness. I do not expect huge gains in fuel economy, but believe that this will pay for itself over (a long) time.
Dave
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 01:04 PM
  #168  
4dr4life!'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 355
From: Torrance, California
Originally Posted by manxman
Oofie & 4dr:
I registered with the K & N site for info. on new products in the works for Fits back in September. When they Emailed about the drop-in filter, I bought and installed it. But because the OEM air box has a "muffler", that translates to me as restrictive baffling to reduce noise. I did notice a slight MPG increase with the drop-in filter. I just ordered the "Typhoon" SRI kit because with no muffler, restriction must also be reduced. Although the Fujita SRI is somewhat cheaper, I have read complaints about its crooked fit in the engine bay. I decided to spend more on the K & N because of decades of good experience with their quality and effectiveness. I do not expect huge gains in fuel economy, but believe that this will pay for itself over (a long) time.
Dave
I wonder which part is the "muffler" on the air box. Never really like any of the SRI that were released right away.
 
Old Jan 9, 2007 | 10:44 PM
  #169  
sonorliteman's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 232
From: Gone
Originally Posted by 4dr4life!
I wonder which part is the "muffler" on the air box. Never really like any of the SRI that were released right away.
It is actually called a resonator chamber, and believe it or not, I've read that they actually can promote air flow by cancelling harmonic frequencies at certain engine rpms which can contribute to air flow resistance.

The Fit's stock intake box has a small bulbous chamber right above the snorkel, and there is another more complex chamber molded into the bottom side of the main air box....what is interesting is that this chamber has an opening to the area beneath the filter, exposed to unfiltered air, and the other end is open at the throttle body. So it is conceivable that the intake could be pulling in a small portion of unfiltered air, but I'm betting that by design it does nothing other than equalize the pressure between the two areas of the chamber. For those who don't understand what I'm talking about, take out the stock air filter and look for a small notch opening in the bottom of the intake torwards the front of the car. That passage leads all the way beneath the intake and opens up at the throttle body.
 
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 12:22 PM
  #170  
Bounty Hunter's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 211
From: Nebraska
I'm thinking about buying a K&N drop in panel filter. Auto Anything has them for $34.XX and that includes free shipping.
 

Last edited by Bounty Hunter; Feb 7, 2007 at 12:25 PM.
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #171  
docjim2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 431
From: Marietta, GA
Then what about the so called electric 'superchargers' ... no not the Turbonator... the e-ram, SEMA International New Product Award 2007... claims increase the CFM to 800 ?
 
Old Feb 7, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #172  
docjim2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 431
From: Marietta, GA
dark jazz: What kind of filter in the pic? K&N? if so what stock number?
 

Last edited by docjim2; May 1, 2007 at 09:17 AM.
Old Feb 19, 2007 | 09:16 AM
  #173  
jazzista's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (4)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 263
From: Zena, Italy
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by strepto
Adding an aftermarket intake system is probably the most common upgrade today. However - in most cases it will increase the fuel consumption. The reason is simple. The Jazz ECU uses the output of the primary O2 sensor to calculate injector Duty Cycle. This is done in whats called a Closed Loop operation - a part of the OBD1 and OBD2 systems.

...mega snip...

- it needs to be tuned to perform its best
Hi Todd, all,
so, I wonder that also a simple flat panel filter (a-la K&N, or similar) would behave similarly... What would you recommend (if any) as a filter upgrade for my wife's Jazz 1,2l ?

Thanks a lot,

Stefano
 
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:07 PM
  #174  
utnorris's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by docjim2
Then what about the so called electric 'superchargers' ... no not the Turbonator... the e-ram, SEMA International New Product Award 2007... claims increase the CFM to 800 ?
I am too also interested in how well these devices do. Do they really work?

Utnorris
 
Old May 1, 2007 | 09:14 AM
  #175  
docjim2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 431
From: Marietta, GA
then would insulating the outside of the tube help keep more heat out?
 
Old May 4, 2007 | 02:24 AM
  #176  
SiLvEr_JeZi's Avatar
New Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 9
From: Philippines
I logged on the K&N website and found out that the part number for the Typhoon Intake System 69-1016TS. Does anybody know if this will fit in a 1.3L IDSi Jazz? Because it said in the website that it is for a 2007 1.5L Fit. Is there any difference?
 
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 04:01 AM
  #177  
hoey888's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16
From: Melbourne
Just a question, with the K&N filter will it matter if i want to install into my aussie jazz with CVT?
 
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 06:57 AM
  #178  
utnorris's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
From: Dallas, TX
I know the K&N SRI had some problems with fitting when it first came out, is this still an issue?

Thanks,

Utnorris
 
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #179  
manxman's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,288
From: Boulder Creek, CA, USA
Originally Posted by utnorris
I know the K&N SRI had some problems with fitting when it first came out, is this still an issue?

Thanks,

Utnorris
IT IS STILL AN ISSUE with USDM Fits!! K&N SRI does not fit properly with USDM. The previous poster was asking about his Australian Jazz. I don't believe that there are any fitment problems with K&N intakes on JDM 1.3L Jazz.
 
Old Sep 17, 2007 | 11:18 AM
  #180  
utnorris's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
From: Dallas, TX
Thanks, I was hoping the issue had been resolved by now. Oh well, guess I will go to a different brand.
Thanks again,
Utnorris
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.