Fit Wheels & Tires Discuss Wheels & Tires for the Fit and Jazz

TIRE questions,sizes, mounting,pressures ANY tire questions

Old Dec 15, 2006 | 09:13 PM
  #361  
mjrossman17's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 135
From: NY
Originally Posted by etong
did you have alignment checked? stock tires usually last a long ass time but they suck on everything else
I had the car alignment verified at 4500 miles.
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 02:51 AM
  #362  
fm2n's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 221
From: SD, CA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by mobortho
I've got 11,000 miles in 6 months with no noticeable wear. I'll just run them to about 20k, and then put them on the back and run at least 20k more.

PS-My sister-in-law got a Fit in October and blew a tire on road hazard on the second day. Completely destroyed the tire. It was tough to get an OEM Dunlop replacement but the Honda dealer got one in about 3 days.

Keep in mind that the tire with more tread belongs in the back.
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 07:41 AM
  #363  
mjrossman17's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 135
From: NY
Originally Posted by fm2n
Keep in mind that the tire with more tread belongs in the back.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. About 90% of braking is done with the front and of course the redirection of the car as well. Sliding in the snow is much easier to control if the the front tires hold their line (even if the rear breaks loose). Also downshifting is a good way to slow in a controlled manner, provided you have adaquate traction on your drive wheels. If thats not what you meant, then sorry to go off on a tangent.
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #364  
fm2n's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 221
From: SD, CA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by mjrossman17
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. About 90% of braking is done with the front and of course the redirection of the car as well. Sliding in the snow is much easier to control if the the front tires hold their line (even if the rear breaks loose). Also downshifting is a good way to slow in a controlled manner, provided you have adaquate traction on your drive wheels. If thats not what you meant, then sorry to go off on a tangent.
http://www.nebraskatire.com/tires_101/2tires.htm
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 12:55 PM
  #365  
mjrossman17's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 135
From: NY
Despite that one reference, I have confidence in my ability to compensate for oversteering situations. Regardless of traction, the rear tires are perfectly fine and will be rotated to the front in ,1k miles.
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #366  
manxman's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,288
From: Boulder Creek, CA, USA
fm2n-
Thanks for the tire advice. As a truck/SUV driver for decades, I would have put the best tread tires on the drive wheels also. I'm still not certain that I completely agree with the info. on your link, but it is something to think about. With tires worn either on the front or back, I will probably replace all of them with a better brand than Dunlop. I only have about 1500 miles on my Fit, so this won't be an issue for a while.
 
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #367  
mobortho's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
From: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by fm2n
Keep in mind that the tire with more tread belongs in the back.
I read your link and I still don't think I agree. I'm 47 with lots of years of owning and maintaining cars. I have always (on front wheel drive cars) wanted the best up front for driving, braking, and steering. The issue of losing traction on the rear would only come up in severe situations, which could happen in normal driving, but most often when "hot-dogging" and driving hard.
My son just had a 360 skid in a Jeep Cherokee at 70 MPH due to an immediate stop. That vehicle is so light in the rear that the drive axle can't hold traction in a turn or hard stop, so I'm getting rid of that vehicle.
I still like having my best tires up front on FWD vehicle....
 
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 03:12 PM
  #368  
fm2n's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 221
From: SD, CA
5 Year Member
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 05:56 PM
  #369  
mjrossman17's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 135
From: NY
Originally Posted by fm2n
Ok, thank you for taking the time to show your proof. I will take this into consideration with future tire changes. I am fine with admitting I am wrong. Thanks again for the information.
 
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #370  
mjrossman17's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 135
From: NY
The previous series of posts have not been pertinent to the topic, and I was wondering if anyone else had the premature wear issue. I just want to know if it is a defect with my car, a fluke or otherwise.
 
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 06:14 PM
  #371  
Harry_Fit's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 98
From: Bay Area
^Thanks a lot!
 
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #372  
fm2n's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 221
From: SD, CA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by mjrossman17
Ok, thank you for taking the time to show your proof. I will take this into consideration with future tire changes. I am fine with admitting I am wrong. Thanks again for the information.
No worries. Would rather people do it right than be killed. I've actually fishtailed in the rain while doing a small turn at a freeway outlet. I am quite proficient in my maneuvering and it all happened so fast that I didn't even have time to consider compensating. Right when my car came to a halt, I immediately floored it to get on the road again before someone came along hitting me.
 
Old Dec 17, 2006 | 07:16 PM
  #373  
mobortho's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 39
From: Mobile, Alabama
Originally Posted by fm2n
I give in too... But I definitely believe Michelin more than I do Nebraska Tire.... Thanks for the tip.
 
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #374  
outlawhonda's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 124
From: Houston
Overall diameter for 205/50/15

How much difference in overall diameter with 205/50/15 on 15x7 vs Stock?
 
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 05:53 PM
  #375  
2hot6ft2's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 544
From: Grant, Alabama U.S.A.
5 Year Member
overall diameter with 205/50/15 is: 23.07 inches
overall diameter with 195/55/15 is: 23.44 inches

So 0.37 inches difference.

Also when running the 205's When speedometer reads 60mph (96.6km/h) actual speed will be 59.2mph (95.3km/h): 1.3% slower.

15x7.0 and 15x6.5 rim size difference has no effect on tire diameter.
 
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 03:17 AM
  #376  
iamgine's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
From: eugene, OR
Will the tires fit? NEWBIE QUESTION

Hi, I am new to cars and I am wondering if I buy new tires with specs of 195-60-15, will they fit on my Honda Fit Sport wheel (it currently has the original 195-55-15 Dunlop tire)????

If not, what size wheels do I have to buy? I don't understand the connection between sizes between tires and wheels.

Please enlighten me.
 

Last edited by iamgine; Dec 20, 2006 at 04:43 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 02:01 PM
  #377  
DocB04's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 20
From: Jacksonville, Florida
195 = width
55 = how tall the tire is from the edge of the wheel
15 = wheel diameter

Short answer to your question is yes, but they will rub and cause your speedometer to be incorrect due to the amount of rotations per mile that your speed sensor in your transmission will be reading.
 
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #378  
iamgine's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 9
From: eugene, OR
Originally Posted by DocB04
195 = width
55 = how tall the tire is from the edge of the wheel
15 = wheel diameter

Short answer to your question is yes, but they will rub and cause your speedometer to be incorrect due to the amount of rotations per mile that your speed sensor in your transmission will be reading.
Thanks for replying.

The rotations per mile error is fine since it is pretty insignificant (about 2-3 mph at 70 mph.). At least based on this site: http://www.paspeedo.com/calculator.htm

What do you mean they will rub? Is that serious?

*EDIT
What is the difference between the different types of all season tires (performance, grand touring, passenger, etc) in terms of road noise? Does performance tire generally produce more road noise than passenger tires?
 

Last edited by iamgine; Dec 20, 2006 at 04:34 PM.
Old Dec 20, 2006 | 10:15 PM
  #379  
arsonall's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 171
From: LAKE FOREST, CA
there are two sides to any purchased part: performance and luxury. to perform better you have to give up some luxury, and vise-versa.

want better performing tires, you may have to sacrifice NVH (noise, vibration, harshness). check out tirerack.coms tire comparison guide, its a pretty good reference for a list of tires.
 
Old Dec 21, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #380  
TO_FIT_OR_NOT_TO_FIT's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 33
From: Long Beach, Ca
Question Mounting and Balancing??? SoCal

Any1 in the SoCal area know where to get mounting and balancing for cheap? No dismounting needed..just the mounting and balancing price.

Any help would b great.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 AM.