General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Mileage reports: Manual transmission (5MT)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 09:30 PM
  #321  
Gordio's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,092
From: san francisco, ca, USA
You lucky son of a B. I wish i got 40. I live in San francisco, full of hills. Glad to hear from another hapy fit owner. What always impresses me is it can get its mileage, and is pretty fast.
 
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 11:27 AM
  #322  
manxman's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,288
From: Boulder Creek, CA, USA
Doc,

My results on the first tank with my AT Sport were similar (39 mpg), but never equaled in the next 8 months of driving. Probably due to delivery dealer filling the tank COMPLETELY, and the average gas pump clicking off before complete filling is achieved. There are several threads on tank filling technique vs. accurate mpg calculations. I hope that you will see similar results in the future, but I doubt that you will.
 
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #323  
utnorris's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by F0NIX
Ciburri, are you absolutly sure about your facts here?
I have searched various technical documents and cant find anything other than the EVAP cannister that has to do with fuel:
"Evaporative Emission (EVAP) Control Diagram" <- On the bottom of this page is a diagram that show how it works and what I can see it only takes the fumes from the fueltank and not the fuel in liquid form. If the valve on top of the fuel tank is open when the ignition is of then you will probably fill up the EVAP canister. But I cant think of any reason to let the canister be filled up of fumes when your not using the car?
So I think this valve is closed when ignition is of. And you dont have ignition on when pumping fuel into the car?

EVAP System Component Location Index <- the bottom image shows where the EVAP cannister is located.
Fuel Supply System Component Location Index <- here is the whole fuel system and no other cannister than the EVAP is mentioned on the Jazz/Fit.
So has anyone been able to verify if damage is done when over filling? I like the idea of getting 400 miles before filling up again, guess i am lazy,

Utnorris
 
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 01:36 PM
  #324  
sortanewinatl's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 173
From: Atlanta, Ga
Originally Posted by manxman
Doc,

My results on the first tank with my AT Sport were similar (39 mpg), but never equaled in the next 8 months of driving. Probably due to delivery dealer filling the tank COMPLETELY, and the average gas pump clicking off before complete filling is achieved. There are several threads on tank filling technique vs. accurate mpg calculations. I hope that you will see similar results in the future, but I doubt that you will.
Filling technique should not effect MPG calculations at all... you just need to be consistent about how YOU fill it. On the first tank, it will not be 100% accurate, since you did not fill it up, you don't know how much they did or did not squeze in. Each fuel pump may vary slightly about when it clicks off, but we're talking a fraction of a MPG. The filler neck on a Fit is really long, probably a gallon or more... so it could have a major impact on calculations if you are not consistent about it. (400mi/10ga (not filling the neck) = 40MPG. 400mi/11gal (filling the neck) = 36.6MPG)
 
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 02:46 PM
  #325  
manxman's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,288
From: Boulder Creek, CA, USA
Originally Posted by sortanewinatl
Filling technique should not effect MPG calculations at all... you just need to be consistent about how YOU fill it. On the first tank, it will not be 100% accurate, since you did not fill it up, you don't know how much they did or did not squeze in. Each fuel pump may vary slightly about when it clicks off, but we're talking a fraction of a MPG. The filler neck on a Fit is really long, probably a gallon or more... so it could have a major impact on calculations if you are not consistent about it. (400mi/10ga (not filling the neck) = 40MPG. 400mi/11gal (filling the neck) = 36.6MPG)
Filling technique affects mpg calculations if it isn't always filled, or is never filled, or anywhere in between. As you said, consistency is key to accuracy in calculations.
 
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 10:51 AM
  #326  
gotswap's Avatar
New Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11
From: Colorado Springs
Originally Posted by Gordio
You lucky son of a B. I wish i got 40. I live in San francisco, full of hills. Glad to hear from another hapy fit owner. What always impresses me is it can get its mileage, and is pretty fast.
One thing you have to realize is I am in Colorado and this was going through a pass and through mountain twisties. I am highly impressed with this car.
 
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 11:16 AM
  #327  
Doc Holliday's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by manxman
Doc,

My results on the first tank with my AT Sport were similar (39 mpg), but never equaled in the next 8 months of driving. Probably due to delivery dealer filling the tank COMPLETELY, and the average gas pump clicking off before complete filling is achieved. There are several threads on tank filling technique vs. accurate mpg calculations. I hope that you will see similar results in the future, but I doubt that you will.
Actually I topped the tank off after I ran the dealer fillup down to 3/4 tank and then started calculating my mileage
 
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 08:46 AM
  #328  
dank24's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (-2)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,189
From: NEPA
359miles and 8.6gl to fill = 41.7mpg
 
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 09:47 AM
  #329  
Doc Holliday's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
From: Raleigh, NC
Originally Posted by dank24
359miles and 8.6gl to fill = 41.7mpg
Sweet, I'm on target for around that on my 2nd tank
 
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 12:51 PM
  #330  
gotswap's Avatar
New Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 11
From: Colorado Springs
So the first tank was not a fluke.

2nd fillup was 38.78mpg. This was very mountainous terrain a/c on and varied city driving. I expected to get much less and was super surprised!!!

Overall average is close to 41mpg on 2 tanks.
 

Last edited by gotswap; Jul 20, 2007 at 12:52 PM. Reason: addition to post
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #331  
Doc Holliday's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 36
From: Raleigh, NC
2nd tank of gas= 375 miles took 8.7 gallons = 43.1 mpg
 
Old Jul 24, 2007 | 05:31 AM
  #332  
Rdean58's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 46
From: Germantown, MD
7th tank of regular, 37.5 mpg

My Running average is 36.6 mpg
(76.93 gallons, 2811.6 miles)
 
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 12:16 AM
  #333  
utnorris's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 39
From: Dallas, TX
I made a trip from Dallas to tallahassee, Fl last week and this what I got.
Going down and driving at an average speed of 75+ I got roughly 33mpg. Coming back I decided I would try something different. I drove at 65 mph or less and got roughly 38.5 mpg on the first tank. I decided I needed to make up some time so I drove at a higher speed after that. So my conclusion is that if you can drive at 65 mph or less you should be able to get at least 38mpg. I have not tried this in city driving, but I will do this in this upcoming week to see if I can get better gas mileage. Also, I asked the service tech at the dealership about topping off the tank and he said it wouldn't do any harm. I figure he should know if it would or not. At 38mpg this would allow me to get roughly 450 miles out of each tank before having to refuel which is pretty sweet if you ask me. Anyway, thought everyone might be interested. In the future please post your driving speed with your mpg average. I am curious if it is just me that is getting these results.
Thank you,
Utnorris
 
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 03:55 AM
  #334  
Jebus's Avatar
New Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 20
From: california
Yahoo autos states that the civic in general gets better overall mileage with a larger 1.8L engine, Automatic transmission being the higher @ 40Mpg. The Fit gets clocked in at 38Mpg with a Manual. Does anyone own an 06-07 civic? I want to know if it's true that.
 
Old Jul 30, 2007 | 02:12 PM
  #335  
Rdean58's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 46
From: Germantown, MD
8th Tank, 39.1 mpg

Lots of highway driving at 60 to 75 mph and commuting.
 
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:41 PM
  #336  
cojaro's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,584
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Jebus
Yahoo autos states that the civic in general gets better overall mileage with a larger 1.8L engine, Automatic transmission being the higher @ 40Mpg. The Fit gets clocked in at 38Mpg with a Manual. Does anyone own an 06-07 civic? I want to know if it's true that.
I had an '06 Civic and saw a consistent 27mpg (between 26 and 28) in the city and about 38-39mpg for the few all-highway trips I took.



First tank on my MT Fit = 29.5mpg! Not bad for a newbie stickshifter driving all city miles.
 
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #337  
WickedWeasel's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13
From: Atlanta Ga
Im averaging around 35-38mpg for my manual tranny. Very nice I must say.
 
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 04:07 PM
  #338  
garciafit's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
From: Oakland, Ca
2007 MT Fit Sport (Storm Silver)

I average about 38-40 MPG. Running at about 65-70 MPH. Less of course running around 85-90 MPH. I love this car, worth the money!!!!
 
Old Aug 2, 2007 | 04:13 PM
  #339  
grouser's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 369
From: USA
First tank of gas from the dealer, don't know the brand, or how they filled it (topped off or not). Got 34.7 with about 60% freeway @ 80 mph and 40% mountain roads.
 
Old Aug 4, 2007 | 03:40 PM
  #340  
mr-cappy's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
From: albuquerque
2nd tank

Second tank got 37.7 mpg ...
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 PM.