2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

2009 Fit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 31, 2008 | 11:24 AM
  #1121  
SheepNutz's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 831
From: Kentucky
I've been calling a few of the local Honda dealerships, and nobody can really give me any solid info. A few are supposed to call me when they find out about color/pricing options and when brochures are in.
 
Old May 31, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #1122  
Nigal's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 38
From: Dayton, Ohio
I see the projected mpg on the 2009 is 28 mpg city/34 which is almost what the Yaris is rated at. Real world mpg should exceed this then. This might be enough to get me to switch.
 
Old May 31, 2008 | 08:14 PM
  #1123  
corey415's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 728
From: San Francisco, CA
Temple of VTEC Rumors and News - 2009 Fit Color List


GE8729EW 2009 FIT 5DR 5MT KA
GE8749EW 2009 FIT 5DR SPORT 5MT KA
GE8769GW 2009 FIT 5DR SPORT VSA&NAV 5MT KA
GE8829EW 2009 FIT 5DR 5AT KA
GE8849EW 2009 FIT 5DR SPORT 5AT KA
GE8869GW 2009 FIT 5DR SPORT VSA&NAV 5AT KA


Sport

CRYSTAL BLACK PEARL/BLACK
BLUE SENSATION/BLACK
TIDEWATER BLUE METALLIC/BLACK
ORANGE REVOLUTION/BLACK
BLACKBERRY PEARL/BLACK
MILANO RED/BLACK
STORM SILVER METALLIC/BLACK
TAFFETA WHITE/BLACK

Base
CRYSTAL BLACK PEARL/GRAY
BLUE SENSATION/GRAY
TIDEWATER BLUE METALLIC/GRAY
MILANO RED/GRAY
STORM SILVER METALLIC/GRAY
TAFFETA WHITE/GRAY

Looks like VSA is packaged only when you get the NAVI option. What happened to "Safety for Everyone"?
 
Old May 31, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #1124  
Fitter, Happier's Avatar
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 43
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by Nigal
I see the projected mpg on the 2009 is 28 mpg city/34 which is almost what the Yaris is rated at. Real world mpg should exceed this then. This might be enough to get me to switch.
That's the same as the 07/08 MT Fit which sounds accurate because a representitive for the new Fit said the mileage would remain about the same even with the increased HP.

I do feel that the new Fit should have exceeded these numbers especially considering that the bigger, more powerful Civic is rated at 36
mpg highway (although gets a lower 25 city). Plus, extra progress should be happening with fuel prices getting out of hand.

It seems automakers have hit a wall for fuel efficiency gains (excluding hybrids). Look at each of the last several generations of Civic, Corolla, Accord, Camry ect...they all have comparable mileage. Perhaps because they keep getting bigger, but still...
 
Old May 31, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #1125  
SheepNutz's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 831
From: Kentucky
Originally Posted by corey415
Looks like VSA is packaged only when you get the NAVI option. What happened to "Safety for Everyone"?
So VSA is needed to make a car safe? The Fit is a damn safe car even without VSA. That said, I'm getting the navi anyway, so I guess I'll take VSA (I'll probably turn it off half the time though, it just depends).
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 05:27 AM
  #1126  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 60
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by Fitter, Happier
It seems automakers have hit a wall for fuel efficiency gains (excluding hybrids). Look at each of the last several generations of Civic, Corolla, Accord, Camry ect...they all have comparable mileage. Perhaps because they keep getting bigger, but still...
Just look at the weight increase with each new generation of cars...
look at the sizes.. park a 90s Accord next to the new one..

These cars are obviously made for US market too... why do we need cars
this big anyways?? Are bigger cars always means better cars?
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #1127  
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
the current fit does great as far as city mileage goes, so i'd rather see a bump in highway mileage. if the rating is 28/35, that puts it at 3mpg better in the city and only one mpg worse on the highway than the civic.

all this while getting more hp is commendable.
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:16 AM
  #1128  
Nigal's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 38
From: Dayton, Ohio
Originally Posted by Fitter, Happier
That's the same as the 07/08 MT Fit which sounds accurate because a representitive for the new Fit said the mileage would remain about the same even with the increased HP.

I do feel that the new Fit should have exceeded these numbers especially considering that the bigger, more powerful Civic is rated at 36
mpg highway (although gets a lower 25 city). Plus, extra progress should be happening with fuel prices getting out of hand.

It seems automakers have hit a wall for fuel efficiency gains (excluding hybrids). Look at each of the last several generations of Civic, Corolla, Accord, Camry ect...they all have comparable mileage. Perhaps because they keep getting bigger, but still...
I don't know if it's screwed up marketing info or what but car manufactures should start offing America some of the choices Europe gets. If they brought there cars with the modern 4 cylinder diesel engines in them people would start buying them. The diesels get better mileage than the hybrids and run just as clean. The lack of cars with manual transmissions is crazy too. Look what Smart did, they bring the Fortwo to America and put a turbo engine which requires premium gas and it has a crap simi-auto transmission and gets less mpg than a Yari for $3,000 more.

Cheap, clean efficient transportation is what they should be bring here.
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 03:53 PM
  #1129  
hiroko12's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256
From: North Royalton, Ohio
Too bad Diesel is running almost $5.00 per gallon now though. Is it really a good idea?
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #1130  
ProMed's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 519
From: North Carolina
From the 2008 Vancouver Auto Show Link the a-pillar windows look huge and the front doesn't look very long, personally I like it!

 

Last edited by ProMed; Jun 1, 2008 at 04:28 PM. Reason: corrupt pic link correct
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 04:13 PM
  #1131  
Fitter, Happier's Avatar
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 43
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by ProMed
From the 2008 Vancouver Auto Show Link the a-pillar windows look huge and the front doesn't look very long, personally I like it!


Great to see a blue one! I really don't like the red one they used as the introduction model. I wan't to see a USDM Storm silver metallic!!
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #1132  
ProMed's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 519
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Fitter, Happier
I want to see a USDM Storm silver metallic!!
I'm looking forward to checking it out in TW!
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 04:33 PM
  #1133  
hiroko12's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 256
From: North Royalton, Ohio
Agreed, this blue one looks great.
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 06:49 PM
  #1134  
FormulaJDM's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 316
From: Tucson,AZ
5 Year Member
That shade of blue looks sweet, is it Blue Sensation?
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 08:44 PM
  #1135  
corey415's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 728
From: San Francisco, CA
Originally Posted by SheepNutz
So VSA is needed to make a car safe? The Fit is a damn safe car even without VSA.
Stability control is a proven technology that saves lives. They should have at least packaged it with all Sport models; it shouldn't be tethered to an option like NAVI.
 
Old Jun 1, 2008 | 09:45 PM
  #1136  
pcs0snq's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,049
From: lake worth FL
Originally Posted by Nigal
I see the projected mpg on the 2009 is 28 mpg city/34
You see that from this site from a user or from a credible source?
 
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 12:35 AM
  #1137  
The Captain's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 42
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by corey415
Stability control is a proven technology that saves lives. They should have at least packaged it with all Sport models; it shouldn't be tethered to an option like NAVI.
I agree. You should not have be forced to get a NAV system just because you want VSA. Either make it standard or at least a stand alone option but not in a bundle like NAV.
 
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 01:09 AM
  #1138  
Sid 6.7's Avatar
Why so serious?
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,772
From: Memphis, TN
5 Year Member
All of those packages are awesome in their own way! I love the versatility of the car. Just wish we had those choices here.

But most of the car buyers in NA simply don't view the Fit as that viable of a vehicle. It's just an "economy-minded tiny import hatch with decent gas mileage, now where can I get my Escalade with 22s?" kinda of mentality here.


Originally Posted by The Captain
I like the looks of the 2009 and am trying to decide between it, the new xB, and an Element SC. All quite different but neat in their own way.

Unfortunately, we won't get these packages in the U.S.

Active Plus
HondabHonda AccessbFITb‚¨‚·‚·‚ß—p•i

Sports Neo
HondabHonda AccessbFITb‚¨‚·‚·‚ß—p•i

Luxe'ster
HondabHonda AccessbFITb‚¨‚·‚·‚ß—p•i
 
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 03:54 AM
  #1139  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 60
From: Los Angeles, CA
Why do Civics have better mpg than Fit anyways?
The 09 Fit should have the same engine technology as the new Civic
right?
 
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 05:36 AM
  #1140  
Nigal's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 38
From: Dayton, Ohio
Originally Posted by pcs0snq
You see that from this site from a user or from a credible source?
JD Powers:

The current Fit’s 109-hp, 1.5-liter engine is rated at 28 mpg city/34 mpg highway in the U.S. Expect the new Fit to meet or exceed those numbers.


2009 Honda Fit Preview | J.D. Power
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:31 PM.