3rd Generation (2015+) Say hello to the newest member of the Fit family. 3rd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Very disappointed in 2015 mpg ratings.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 10:43 AM
  #161  
Fit Charlie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 850
From: The 603
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by mecevans
Unless your shuting the engine off while your coasting your using more fuel than coasting in gear.

All fuel injected cars cut off the fuel injector during coast and deceleration in gear.
They call that engine braking. Unless you need to stop (or slow down faster than gravity and wind resistance will achieve) then any kind of braking is bad for fuel economy. It doesn't matter if it makes your instant mpg look great, it's slowing you down and bringing your overall mpg down.
 
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 02:42 PM
  #162  
TCroly's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 427
From: Kihei, Maui, Hawaii
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
Go ahead and push it a bit, but not so much that the rpm spikes up. What you want is fairly high throttle but low rpm. Somewhere in the 2000 - 2500 rpm range with as much throttle as you can convince it to allow without going higher. There's a sweet spot where you get the most power out of the fuel burned.

Relevant article: AutoSpeed - Brake Specific Fuel Consumption
Thanks for that reference article on BSFC. Very informative!
 
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #163  
ROTTBOY's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,116
From: Hawaii: relocated to Western Canada Sept, 2015
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
Thanks for this enlightening article. BSFC is now stuck in the back of my mind when I drive from now on. Makes total sense. The graphs made absorbing the study results, encompassing.

PaleMelanesian - ya gotta have the title: "Resident FF MPG Guru"
 
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 07:48 PM
  #164  
badyellowvette's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by 13fit
who the heck cares about power seats in budget cars?

whats next, a heated steering wheel and heated seats?

No manufacturer should be playing with luxury options in the cheap cars. Its what keeps them lightweight and peppy, while still being safe enough and pass the BS emissions that only 0.0003% of the world cares about
My cheap ass HHR has power seats!
 
Old Jun 20, 2014 | 07:50 PM
  #165  
badyellowvette's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 40
From: Pa
[QUOTE=mecevans;1244217]Unless your shuting the engine off while your coasting your using more fuel than coasting in gear.

I prove that wrong every day.
 
Old Jun 21, 2014 | 07:23 AM
  #166  
Fit Charlie's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 850
From: The 603
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by ROTTBOY
PaleMelanesian - ya gotta have the title: "Resident FF MPG Guru"
He's the FF MPG King. I'll never see his numbers unless I'm on a flatbed.
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 08:59 AM
  #167  
badyellowvette's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 40
From: Pa
[QUOTE=tmfit;1244274]I agree! Besides once you have the seat where you want it how often do you move it? I have power seats in my Dodge pickup, bought it new in 07 and havent moved the seat since I have owned it! Waste of money.

A power seat gives you a lot more adjustments then a manual seat does.
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 11:50 AM
  #168  
Blade Shunner's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 71
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by badyellowvette
A power seat gives you a lot more adjustments then a manual seat does.
A power seat does NOT necessarily give you any more adjustments than a non-power seat. It just gives you power to move the seat in case you're too helpless to do it yourself. AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD!
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 02:50 PM
  #169  
badyellowvette's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by Blade Shunner
A power seat does NOT necessarily give you any more adjustments than a non-power seat. It just gives you power to move the seat in case you're too helpless to do it yourself. AND THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD!
Well my power seats have 8 way adjustments I don't think you can do that with manual.
I started the thread I'll talk about anything I want!
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 07:57 PM
  #170  
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,616
From: .
5 Year Member
8 way adjustment?

Up/down.
Front/back.
Recline/Un-recline.

What else?
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 08:38 PM
  #171  
TCroly's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 427
From: Kihei, Maui, Hawaii
Originally Posted by mike410b
8 way adjustment?

Up/down.
Front/back.
Recline/Un-recline.

What else?
Some seats bottoms tilt
I had one car where the side bolsters could tighten ther grip on your torso.
They may be counting lumbar adjustments
And some manufacturers count the headrest up/ down forward backward.

I have had lots of cars with power seat adjustments and I typically disliked it because I can move the seat back and forth faster by manual adjustment. The only value that I see to power adjustments to seats is if the car has a memory, so that 2 people can each get the seat just like they want and then at the push of one button, the seat goes to their configuration. A nice luxury feature that does not belong on a Fit!
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 09:18 PM
  #172  
tmfit's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 852
From: St Paris, Ohio
5 Year Member
On a 120 mile mostly highway trip today I got 42.2 mpg with ac on.
 
Old Jun 22, 2014 | 11:56 PM
  #173  
jdhommert's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 15
From: Virden
Originally Posted by TCroly
I couldn't agree more, sometimes people get blinded in a quest for better fuel economy and the payoff once you have exceeded about 35MPG is very small



Great site for proving the point made above. Compare 38MPG to 42 MPG over 10,000 miles at $4.00/gallon, $100 savings. The same difference in cost is found by going from 20MPG to 21MPG over the same 10,000 miles.



It really is a point of diminishing returns. Sure 40MPG is better than 35MPG, but it really isn't that much better in the big picture.

But of all the gas powered non-hybrid cars, EPA HWY rated at 40MPG or more, I think the Fit will generally get better real world fuel economy than any of them. As proven by those, like me, who report their fuel economy on Fuelly - Track and Compare your MPG

I can see the facts on the calculator...

but can you PLEASE explain to me the logic of how in the hell this is possible lol

Been sitting here racking my brain about it and a 4mpg increase should be 4x as much as a 1mpg increase.....so help me out here please break it down to me like I'm a 5 year old lol
 
Old Jun 23, 2014 | 12:48 AM
  #174  
TCroly's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 427
From: Kihei, Maui, Hawaii
Originally Posted by jdhommert
I can see the facts on the calculator...

but can you PLEASE explain to me the logic of how in the hell this is possible lol

Been sitting here racking my brain about it and a 4mpg increase should be 4x as much as a 1mpg increase.....so help me out here please break it down to me like I'm a 5 year old lol
The reason that a 4mpg increase from say 18mpg to 22mpg is much more of an increase from 38mpg to 42mpg is because the expession of fuel economy in miles per gallon is not a linear expression. The more miles per gallon, the less fuel used per mile. While that sounds obvious, to understand this, you have to turn the expression around to gallons per mile, or better yet, gallons per one-hundred miles, to have a linear relationship.

18 miles per gallon equals 5.55 gallons per 100 miles
22 miles per gallon equals 4.55 gallons per 100 miles
So this 4mpg increase saves 1 gallon per 100 miles

38 miles per gallon equals 2.63 gallons per 100 miles
42 miles per gallon equals 2.38 gallons per 100 miles
This 4mpg increase saves only 0.25 gallons per 100 miles
To obtain the same 1 gallon per 100 miles savings from 38mpg, you would have to get 61mpg
 
Old Jun 23, 2014 | 01:40 AM
  #175  
jdhommert's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 15
From: Virden
Originally Posted by TCroly
The reason that a 4mpg increase from say 18mpg to 22mpg is much more of an increase from 38mpg to 42mpg is because the expession of fuel economy in miles per gallon is not a linear expression. The more miles per gallon, the less fuel used per mile. While that sounds obvious, to understand this, you have to turn the expression around to gallons per mile, or better yet, gallons per one-hundred miles, to have a linear relationship.

18 miles per gallon equals 5.55 gallons per 100 miles
22 miles per gallon equals 4.55 gallons per 100 miles
So this 4mpg increase saves 1 gallon per 100 miles

38 miles per gallon equals 2.63 gallons per 100 miles
42 miles per gallon equals 2.38 gallons per 100 miles
This 4mpg increase saves only 0.25 gallons per 100 miles
To obtain the same 1 gallon per 100 miles savings from 38mpg, you would have to get 61mpg
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
illoomination
3rd Generation (2015+)
13
Feb 21, 2015 02:32 PM
citabria7
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
290
Nov 22, 2011 12:56 PM
Chazzlee
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
3
Dec 12, 2009 01:55 PM
robodude
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
4
Apr 10, 2009 04:56 PM
curchin
General Fit Talk
3
Jul 21, 2008 10:51 PM




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:53 PM.